Prototypizing and archeotypizing ownership: A pilot study

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Autori/Curatori Edoardo Fittipaldi
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 20 P. 43-62 Dimensione file 232 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2019-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The author’s point of departure is Alf Ross’s analysis of ownership as a tool of presentation for a set of disjunctive conditioning facts and conjunctive legal consequences. The author first analyses Ross’s conjunctive component, and shows that, if one adopts the perspective of Polish-Russian legal realism, it can be provided with a full-blown meaning. Then, the disjunctive component is discussed. By drawing inspiration from prototype theory, the author argues that a specific set of disjunctive conditioning facts and of conjunctive legal consequences can be regarded as making up the core - albeit in a gradual way - of ownership phenomena, provided that one restricts them to movables. Finally, the author presents two Freudian hypotheses that can explain the emergence of the prototype of ownership. This explanation is based on the way babies conceive of their bodily parts and feces. Based on that, an archeotype (i.e., archaic conception) of ownership is proposed.;

Keywords:Ownership - Tû-tû - Prototype theory - Polish-Russian legal realism - Psychoanalysis

  1. [1908]1933. Vvedenie v izučenie prava i nravstvennosti. Osnovy ėmocional’noj psihologii. Partial German translation Methodologie der Theorien des Rechts und der Moral. Zugleich eine neue allgemeine logische Lehre von der Bildung der allgemeinen Begriffe und Theorien. Paris: Sirey.
  2. Piaget, Jean, 1926[1973]. La représentation du monde chez l'enfant. English translation: The Child’s Conception of the World. London: Paladin.
  3. Popper, Karl, [1934]1992. Logik der Forschung. English translation The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
  4. Ranulf, Svend, 1934. Moral Indignation and Middle Class Psychology: A Sociological Study. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.
  5. Ross, Alf, [1951]1956/57. Tû-tû. Harvard Law Review, 70, 5: 812-825.
  6. Ross, Alf, 1958. On Law and Justice. London: Stevens & Sons Limited.
  7. Ross, Alf, 1968. Directives and Norms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
  8. Sacco, Rodolfo, 2007. Antropologia giuridica. Bologna: il Mulino.
  9. Savigny, Friedrich Carl von (Adolf Friedrich Rudorff ed.), 1865. Das Recht des Besitzes, 7th edition. Vienna: Sohn.
  10. Scarpelli, Uberto (Anna Pintore ed.), [1959]1985. Contributo alla semantica del linguaggio normativo. Milan: Giuffrè.
  11. Smith, Adam, 1978[1762-63]. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Report of 1762-63. In Adam Smith (R.L. Meek, D.D. Raphael, P.G. Stein, eds.), Lectures on Jurisprudence. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  12. Taylor, John, 2003. Linguistic Categorization. 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Weber, Max, [1921-1976]1980. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  14. Wrangham, Richard W., W.C. McGrew, Frans B.M. de Waal, Paul G. Heltne (eds.), 1994. Chimpanzee Cultures. Cambridge (MA) & London: Harvard University Press.
  15. Brożek, Bartosz, 2015. On tû-tû. Revus, 27: 15-23, EID: 2-s2.0-84959194724.
  16. Caterina, Raffaele, 2000. Dominanza e possesso (e proprietà?) in alcune società non umane. Rivista di diritto civile, 2, 449-462.
  17. Ferrari, Vincenzo, 1987. Funzioni del diritto. Saggio critico-ricostruttivo. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  18. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2012. Everyday Legal Ontology. Milan: LED.
  19. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2016. What Concept of Morality for Sociology of Morality? From Ossowska’s Rejection of Substantive Definitions to a Formal (Psychoanalytic) Cross-Disciplinary One. Societas/Communitas, 1/2: 15-36.
  20. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2017. Naturalizing Legal Dogmatics. In Bartosz Brożek, Lukasz Kurek, Jerzy Stelmach, The Province of Jurisprudence Naturalized. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
  21. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2018. On Leon Petrażycki’s Critical Realism and Legal Realism. In Bartosz Brożek, Julia Stanek, Jerzy Stelmach (eds), Russian Legal Realism. Springer, Cham, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98821-4_
  22. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2019. Hans Albert’s Critical Rationalism Radicalized: The Perspective of a Sociologist of Law. In Giuseppe Franco (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden: Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-22690-9_23
  23. Freud, Sigmund, 1918. Aus der Geschichte einer infantilen Neurose, -- www.psychanalyse.lu/articles/FreudWolfsmann.pdf (retrieved on May 10th, 2017).
  24. 1929[1953-1974]. Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. English translation Civilization and Its Discontents, in Freud 1953-1974 (James Strachey ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
  25. Galtung, Johan, 1959. Expectations and Interaction Processes. Inquiry, 2: 213-234.
  26. Jhering, Rudolf von, 1869. Ueber den Grund des Besitzesschutzes: Eine Revision d. Lehre vom Besitz. 2nd edition. Jena: Mauke.
  27. Locke, John, [1690]1821. Second Treatise on Government. In John Locke, Two Treatises of Government by John Locke. London: Whitemore and Fenn & C. Brown.
  28. Luhmann, Niklas, 1969. Normen in soziologischer Perspektive. Soziale Welt, 20, 1: 28-48.
  29. MacCormick, Neil, 2007. Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Zambon, Adriano, 2018. Il concetto di proprietà. Milano: Giuffrè Francis Lefebvre.
  31. Maine, Henry Sumner, [1861]1906. Ancient Law in Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. New York: Henry Hold and Company.
  32. Massin, Olivier, 2017. The Metaphysics of Ownership: A Reinachian Account. Axiomathes (2017) 27:577–600,
  33. Pattaro, Enrico, 2016. Axel Hägerström at the Origins of the Uppsala School. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi, Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Dordrecht: Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1479-3_41
  34. Petrażycki, Leon, [1896-97]2010. Vvedenie v nauku politiki prava. In Leon Petrażycki (Elena V. Timoshina, ed.), Teorija i politika prava. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg University press.

Edoardo Fittipaldi, Prototypizing and archeotypizing ownership: A pilot study in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 2/2019, pp 43-62, DOI: 10.3280/SD2019-002002