"Gli inconsci che ci abitano". Dialogando con Timothy Keogh, Mary Morgan, David Shaddock, Filippo Maria Ferro, Monica Vorchheimer, Rosa Jaitin, Elizabeth Palacios

Titolo Rivista INTERAZIONI
Autori/Curatori Anna Maria Nicolò
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 40 P. 17-56 Dimensione file 297 KB
DOI 10.3280/INT2019-002003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

  1. Abraham N., Torok M. (1978). La scorza e il nocciolo. Roma: Borla, 1993.
  2. Anzieu D. (1975). Il gruppo e l’inconscio. Roma: Borla, 1979.
  3. Arnold K. (2005). Intersubjectivity, Multiplicity, and the Dynamic Unconscious. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 41, 3: 519-533. DOI: 10.1080/00107530.2005.1074726
  4. Atwood G., Stolorow R. (1984). Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  5. Baranger W., Baranger M. (1960). La situazione psicoanalitica come campo bipersonale. Milano: Cortina, 1990.
  6. Cahn R. (1991). Adolescenza e follia. Roma: Borla, 2004.
  7. Freud S. (1938). Risultati, idee, problemi. OSF, vol. 11. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  8. Kaës R. (1993). Le groupe et le sujet du groupe. Eléments pour une théorie psychanalyse du groupe. Paris: Dunod.
  9. Kaës R. (2001). Il concetto di legame. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, XII, 2: 161-184.
  10. Kaës R. (2002). La polifonia del sogno. Roma: Borla, 2004.
  11. Kaës R. (2015). L’estensione della psicoanalisi. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2016.
  12. Mancia M. (2006). Memoria implicita e inconscio non rimosso: come si manifestano nel transfert e nel sogno. In Mancia M. (a cura di), Psicoanalisi e Neuroscienze. Milano: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
  13. Nicolò A.M. (1994). A chi appartiene il sogno del sognatore? Richard e Piggle, 2, 2: 197-211.
  14. Nicolò A.M. (2000). Il sogno nella psicoanalisi con la coppia e con la famiglia. In Nicolò A., Trapanese G. (a cura di), Quale psicoanalisi per la coppia? Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2005.
  15. Ogden T.H. (1997). Rêverie and Interpretation. London: Jason Aronson Inc.
  16. Stern D.B. (1997). Unformulated Experience: From Imagination to Dissociation in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  17. Stern D.B. (2003). The fusion of horizons: Dissociation, enactment, and understanding. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 6: 843-873. DOI: 10.1080/10481881309348770
  18. Stolorow R., Atwood G. (1992). Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, J: The Analytic Press.
  19. Stolorow R., Atwood G., Orange D. (2002). Worlds of Experience: Interweaving Philosophical and Clinical Dimensions in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Winnicott D.W. (1971). Gioco e realtà. Roma: Armando, 1974.
  21. Zeddies T. (2000). Within, outside, and in between: The relational unconscious. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17: 467-487. DOI: 10.1037/2F0736/9735173467
  22. Bion W. (1959). Attacks on linking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 40: 308-315.
  23. Duranti A. (2010). Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological Theory, 10, 1: 1-20.
  24. Ellman S. (2002). Freud’s technique papers: A contemporary perspective. New York: Other Press.
  25. Ferro A. (2005). Seeds of Illness, Seeds of Recovery: The Genesis of Suffering and the Role of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
  26. Freud S. (1910). The Future Prospects of Psycho-Analytic Therapy. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 11. London: The Hogarth Press.
  27. Freud S. (1912a). The dynamics of transference. Collected Papers, vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1959.
  28. Freud S. (1912b). The employment of dream-interpretation in psycho-analysis. Collected Papers, vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1959. 
  29. Freud S. (1912c). Recommendations to Physicians Practising Psycho-Analysis. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: The Hogarth Press.
  30. Freud S. (1913). Further recommendations in the technique of psycho-analysis: On beginning the treatment. The question of the first communications. The dynamics of the cure. Collected Papers, vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1959. 
  31. Freud S. (1914). Further recommendations in the technique of psychoanalysis: Recollection, repetition, and working though. Collected Papers, vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1959.
  32. Freud S. (1915). Further recommendations in the technique of psychoanalysis: Observations on transference-love. Collected Papers, vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1959. 
  33. Heimann P. (1950). On counter-transference. International Journal for Psychoanalysis, 31: 81-84.
  34. Husserl E. (1931). Cartesian Meditations. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1960.
  35. Kaës R. (2016). Link and the transference within three interfering psychic spaces. Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 6, 2: 81-193.
  36. Keogh T., Enfield S. (2013). From regression to recovery: Tracking developmental anxieties in couple therapy. Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 3: 28-46.
  37. Keogh T., Palacios E. (2019). Interpretation in Couple and Family Psychoanalysis: Cross Cultural Perspectives. London: Routledge.
  38. Klein M. (1946). Some notes of schizoid mechanisms. International Journal for Psychoanalysis, 27: 99-110.
  39. Nicolò A.M, Norsa D. (2019). Interpretation in family psychoanalysis. In Keogh T., Palacios E. (Eds.), Interpretation in Couple and Family Psychoanalysis: Cross Cultural Perspectives. London: Routledge.
  40. Ogden T.H. (1979). On Projective Identification. International Journal for Psychoanalysis, 60: 357-373.
  41. Freud S. (1914). On narcissism: an introduction. Standard Edition, vol. 14. London: The Hogarth Press.
  42. Pichon-Rivière E. (2017). The theory of the link. In Losso R., de Setton L.S., Scharff D. (Eds.), The Linked Self in Psychoanalysis: The Pioneering Work of Enrique Pichon Rivière. London: Karnac.
  43. Proner K. (2019). The mystery, the turbulence and the passion of infantile phantasy in the couple: Whose pain is it – a shared internal world of unmourned objects. In Keogh T., Palacios E. (Eds.), Interpretation in Couple and Family Psychoanalysis: Cross Cultural Perspectives. London: Routledge.
  44. Puget J. (2015). Subjetivacion discontinua y picoanalisis. Incertidumbre y certezas. Buenos Aires: Lugar.
  45. Racker H. (1951). Observations on the countertransference as a technical tool: Preliminary communication. In Oelsner R. (Ed.), Transference and Countertransference Today. New York: Routledge, 2013.
  46. Racker H. (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 26: 303-357. DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1957.11926061
  47. Spott-Billius E. (1999). Introduction. In Ferro A., The Bi-Personal Field: Experience in Child Analysis. London: Routledge.
  48. Stolorow R.D., Atwood G.E., Orange D.M. (2002). Worlds of experience: Interweaving philosophical and clinical dimensions in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  49. Zeddies T. (2000). Within, outside, and in-between: the relational unconscious. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 3: 467-487.
  50. Balint E. (1993). Unconscious communication between husbands and wives. In Ruszczynski S. (Ed.), Psychotherapy with Couples: theory and practice at the Tavistock Institute of Marital Studies. London: Karnac.
  51. Britton R. (1998). Belief and Imagination. Explorations in Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
  52. Morgan M. (2010). Unconscious beliefs about being a couple. In Nathans S., Schaefer M. (Eds.), Couples on the couch. Psychoanalytic couple therapy and the Tavistock model. London: Routledge, 2017.
  53. Morgan M. (2019). A Couple State of Mind: Psychoanalysis of Couples and the Tavistock Relationships Model. London: Routledge.
  54. Pincus L. (1962). The nature of marital interaction. In the Institute of Marital Studies, The Marital Relationship as a Focus for Casework. London: Institute of Marital Studies.
  55. Beebe B., Cohen P., Lachmann F. (2016). The Mother Infant Interaction Picture Book. New York: Norton.
  56. Beebe B., Lachmann F., Markese S., Bahrick L. (2012a). On the origins of disorganized attachment and internal working models: Paper I. A dyadic systems approach. The International Journal of Rational Perspectives, 22, 2: 253-272. DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2012.666147
  57. Beebe B., Lachmann F., Markese S., Buck K.A., Bahrick L. (2012b). On the origins of disorganized attachment and internal working models: Paper II. An empirical microanalysis of 4-month mother-infant interaction. The International Journal of Rational Perspectives, 22, 3: 352-374. DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2012.679606
  58. Hesse E., Main M. (2006). Frightened, threatening, and dissociative parental behavior in low-risk samples: Description, discussion, and interpretations. Development and psychopathology, 18, 2: 309-343. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579406060172
  59. Main M., Kaplan N., Cassidy J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 1-2: 66-104. DOI: 10.2307/3333827.
  60. Freud S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. Standard Edition, vol. 21. London: The Hogarth Press.
  61. Kaës R. (1989). El pacto denegativo en los conjuntos trans-subjetivos. In Missenard et al., Lo Negativo. Figuras y modalidades. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1991.
  62. Main M., Hesse E. (1990). Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In Greenberg M.T., Cicchetti D., Cummings E.M. (Eds.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on mental health and development. Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention. Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press.
  63. Shaddock D. (2017). Un sistema triadico di sviluppo. Le applicazioni dell’Infant Research al trattamento di coppia. In Castellano R., Bonucci C. (a cura di), Una poltrona per tre: pazienti e analista nella terapia di coppia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  64. Bion W.R. (1961). Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock.
  65. Breuer J., Freud S. (1892-1895). Studi sull’isteria. OSF, vol. 1. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  66. Bromberg Ph.M. (2011). L’ombra dello tsunami. Milano: Cortina, 2012.
  67. Fairbairn R.D. (1952-1963). Il piacere e l’oggetto. Scritti 1952-1963, Roma: Astrolabio, 1992.
  68. Ferro A. et al. (2007). Sognare l’analisi. Sviluppi clinici del pensiero di Wilfred R. Bion. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  69. Freud S., Breuer J. (1892-1895). Studi sull’isteria. OSF, vol. 1. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  70. Freud S. (1899). L’interpretazione dei sogni. OSF, vol. 3. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  71. Freud S. (1915). Metapsicologia: l’inconscio. OSF, vol. 8. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  72. Freud S. (1922). L’Io e l’Es. OSF, vol. 9. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  73. Husserl E. (1935). Il bambino. La genesi del sentire e del conoscere l’altro Roma: Fattore Umano Edizioni, 2019.
  74. Klein M. (1946). Note su alcuni meccanismi schizoidi. In Klein M., Scritti 1921-1958. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1978.
  75. Janet P. (1889). L’automatismo psicologico. Milano: Cortina, 2013.
  76. Levenson E. (1992). Mistakes, errors and oversights. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 28: 555-571. DOI: 10.1080/00107530.1992.10746777
  77. Mancia M. (2006). Implicit Memory and Early Unrepressed Unconscious. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 1: 83-103. DOI: 10.1516/39M7-H9CE-5LQX-YEGY
  78. Matte Blanco I. (1975). The Unconscious as Infinite Sets. An Essay in Bi-logic. London: Rutledge.
  79. Riefolo G. (2019). Scenari dissociativi nella stanza di analisi. I miei tre pazienti del giovedì mattina. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, LXVI: 4.
  80. Stern D.B. (2003). L’esperienza non formulata. Dalla dissociazione all’immaginazione in psicoanalisi. Tirrenia: Del Cerro, 2007.
  81. Aulagnier P. (2001). The Violence of Interpretation: From Pictogram to Statement. Philadelphia: Routledge.
  82. Aulagnier P. (2015). Birth of a body, origin of a history. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96, 5: 1371-1401. DOI: 10.1111/1745-8315.12345
  83. Berenstein I. (2001). The Link and the Other. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82, 1: 141-149. DOI: 10.1516/PRG4-66T2-NQ80-J6L5
  84. Berenstein I. (2012). Vínculo as a Relationship between others. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 81, 3: 565-577.
  85. Berenstein I., Puget J. (1997). Lo vincular. Teoria y Clinica psicoanalitica. Buenos Aires: Ed. Paidós.
  86. Bion W. (1965). Transformations: Change from Learning to Growth. London: Heinmann.
  87. Freud S. (1899). Screen memories. Standard Edition, vol. 3. London: The Hogarth Press.
  88. Freud S. (1912). Remembering, repeating and working through. Standard Edition, vol. 12. London: The Hogarth Press.
  89. Kaës R. (2005) A hypothesis for a third topic regarding intersubjectivity and the subject in a common, shared psychic space. Funzione Gamma, rivista on line. -- http://www.funzionegamma.it/wp-content/uploads/hypothesis-topic.pdf
  90. Vorchheimer M. (2017a). Approaching couples from the lens of link theory. Fort Da, 23, 2: 17-30.
  91. Vorchheimer M., Scharff D. (2017b). Clinical Dialogues on Psychoanalysis with Couples and Families. London: Karnac.
  92. Vorchheimer M. (2017c). Discussion by Monica Vorchheimer to “The Link and the Argentinian approach to families” by Elizabeth Palacios and Alicia Monserrat. In Scharff D., Palacios E. (Eds.), Family and Couple Psychoanalysis: A Global Perspective. London: Karnac.
  93. Vorchheimer M. (2019). Loss in the everyday life of couples. In Keogh T., Gregory-Roberts C. (Eds.), Psychoanalytic Approaches to Loss: Mourning, Melancholia and Couples. London: Routledge.
  94. Abraham N., Torok M. (1987). L’écorce et le noyau. Paris: Flammarion, 2014.
  95. Bleger J. (1975). Simbiosis y Ambigüedad. Buenos Aires: Paidos.
  96. Jaitin R. et al. (2018). La thérapie familiale contemporaine. Les apports de Pichon Rivière. Lyon: Chronique Sociale.
  97. Kaës R. (1993). Il gruppo e il soggetto del gruppo. Roma: Borla, 1994.
  98. Kaës R. (2009). Le alleanze inconsce. Roma: Borla, 2010.
  99. Kaës R. (2015). L’estensione della psicoanalisi. Per una metapsicologia di terzo tipo. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2016.
  100. Pichon-Rivière E. (1960). Tratamiento de grupos familiares. Psicoterapia colectiva. In Pichon-Rivière, El proceso grupal. Del psicoanálisis a la Psicologia Social. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, 1975.
  101. Racamier P. (1992). Le deuil originaire. Paris: Payot.

Anna Maria Nicolò, "Gli inconsci che ci abitano". Dialogando con Timothy Keogh, Mary Morgan, David Shaddock, Filippo Maria Ferro, Monica Vorchheimer, Rosa Jaitin, Elizabeth Palacios in "INTERAZIONI" 2/2019, pp 17-56, DOI: 10.3280/INT2019-002003