Four scenarios (and a black swan) in the future of post-democracy

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE
Author/s Gabriele Giacomini
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2019/58
Language Italian Pages 24 P. 79-102 File size 344 KB
DOI 10.3280/SC2019-058005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The scenarios, a future studies research method, do not predict the future but explore multiple possible futures, do not work on the most likely futures but create sets of possible futures. Thanks to these characteristics, the method is suitable for dealing with a complex theme such as the evolution of democracy in relation to digital communication technologies. The elaboration of the process, starting from a theoretical analysis, will lead to four scenarios (2018-2038) that will be described: e-democracy (greater participation in politics and acceptance of digital in democratic processes), Swiss model democracy (Greater participation and refusal of digital), representative democracy with evoting (less participation and ac-ceptance of digital), representative democracy in crisis (lower participation and re-fusal of digital). In conclusion, some considerations will be made in terms of stra-tegic directions.

Keywords: Scenarios, futures studies, democracy, digital communication tech-nologies.

  1. Alongi A. (2017), Democrazia e riforme alla difficile prova del digitale. Intervista a Paolo Coppola, testo disponibile in http://www.labparlamento.it/thinknet/democrazia-riforme-alla-difficile-prova-del-digitale/ (26/11/2018).
  2. Andeweg R.B. (1996), Elite-mass Linkages in Europe: Legitimacy Crisis or Party Crisis?, in Hayward (eds), Elitism, Populism and European Politics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 143-163.
  3. Bentivegna S. (2009), Disuguaglianze digitali. Le nuove forme di esclusione nella società dell'informazione, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
  4. Ceri P. (1996), Partecipazione sociale, -- in http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/partecipazione-sociale (Enciclopedia-delle-scienze-sociali)/ (26/11/2019).
  5. Cinquegrani R. (2012), L’approccio per scenari tra passato, presente e futuro, in Arnaldi S., Poli R. (2012), La previsione sociale. Introduzione allo studio dei futuri, Carocci, Roma.
  6. Corbetta P. (2017), (a cura di), M5S, come cambia il partito di Grillo, il Mulino, Bologna.
  7. Crouch C. (2003), Postdemocrazia, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
  8. Dahrendorf R. (1977), Cittadini e partecipazione: al di là della democrazia rappresentativa? in Sartori G., Dahrendorf R., Il cittadino totale, Centro di documentazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino.
  9. Daudt H. (1961), Floating Voters and the Floating Vote: A Critical Analysis of American and English Election Studies, H. E. Stenfert Kroese, Leiden.
  10. De Blasio E. (2014), Democrazia digitale. Una piccola introduzione, Luiss University Press, Roma.
  11. De Blasio E. (2018), Il governo online. Nuove frontiere della politica, Carocci, Roma.
  12. De Jouvenel B (1967), L’arte della congettura, Vallecchi, Firenze.
  13. De Vries W., Tarrance L. (1972), The Ticket Splitter: A New Force in American Politics, William B. Erdmans, Grand Rapid, Michigan.
  14. Della Porta D. (2011), Democrazie, il Mulino, Bologna.
  15. Fici A. (2002), Internet e le nuove forme di partecipazione politica, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  16. Gerbaudo P. (2018), The Digital Party. Political Organisation and Online Democracy, Pluto Press, London.
  17. Giacomini G. (2016), Psicodemocrazia, Mimesis, Milano.
  18. Giacomini G. (2018a), Potere digitale, Meltemi, Milano.
  19. Vaccari C. (2012), La politica online, il Mulino, Bologna.
  20. Van Biezen I., Mair P., Poguntke T. (2012), Going, Going... Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Conteporary Europe, «European Journal of Political Research», 51, 1, pp. 24-56.
  21. Warschauer M. (2003), Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  22. Wilkinson A. (2009), Scenarios practices: in search of theory, «Journal of Futures Studies», 13, pp. 107–114.
  23. Wright G., Cairns G. (2011), Scenario thinking. Practical approaches to the future, Palgrave, New York.
  24. Urry J. (2016), What is the future?, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  25. Urbinati N. (2019), Me the People. How Populism Transforms Democracy, Harvard University Press.
  26. Sunstein C. (2017), #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media, Princeton University Press, Princeton
  27. Sorice M. (2019), Partecipazione democratica, Mondadori, Milano.
  28. Sorice M. (2014), I media e la democrazia, Carocci, Roma.
  29. Schoemaker P.J.H. (1993), Multiple scenario development: its conceptual and behavioral foundation, «Strategic Management Journal», 14, pp. 193–213.
  30. Scarrow S.E. (2000), Parties Without Members? Party Organization in a changing electoral environment, in Dalton R.J., Wattenberg M.P. (eds), Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 79-101.
  31. Sardar Z. (2013), Future, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  32. Salvadori M.L. (2009), Democrazie senza democrazia, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
  33. Reddick C.G. (2011), Citizen interaction and e‐government: Evidence for the managerial, consultative, and participatory models, «Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy», 5, 2, pp.167-184.
  34. Popper K. (1972), Congetture e confutazioni, il Mulino, Bologna.
  35. Poli R. (2019), Lavorare con il futuro, Egea, Milano.
  36. Pasquino G. (1997), Corso di scienza politica, il Mulino, Bologna.
  37. Parisier, Eli. (2011), The Filter Bubble. How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think, Penguin, London.
  38. Norris P. (2002), Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  39. Mazzoleni G. (2012), La comunicazione politica, il Mulino, Bologna.
  40. Masini E., (1993), Why futures studies?, Grey Seal Books, London.
  41. Manin B. (1997), The principles of representative government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  42. Mancini P. (2002), Il sistema fragile. I mass media in Italia tra politica e mercato, Carrocci, Roma.
  43. Mair P., Van Biezen I. (2001), Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980-2000, «Party Politics», 7, 1, pp. 5-21.
  44. Mair P. (2013), Ruling the Void. The Hollowing of Western Democracy, Verso, London, trad. it. (2016), Governare il vuoto. La fine della democrazia dei partiti, Rubbettino, Soveria Mannelli.
  45. Mair P. (2002), In the Aggregate: Mass Electoral Behaviour in Western Europe, 1950-2000, in Keman H. (eds), Comparative Democratic Politics, Sage, London, pp. 122-140.
  46. Lindgren M., Bandhold H. (2003), Scenario planning. The link between future and strategy, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  47. Giacomini G. (2018b), Il paradosso del pluralismo online. Fra l’effettività della polarizzazione e la normatività della concordia discors, «Sociologia. Rivista quadrimestrale di Scienze Storiche e Sociali», 3, pp. 102 110.

Gabriele Giacomini, Quattro scenari (e un cigno nero) nel futuro della post-democrazia in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 58/2019, pp 79-102, DOI: 10.3280/SC2019-058005