CSR and management control integration. Evidence from an employee welfare plan implementation

Author/s Chiara Mio, Antonio Costantini, Silvia Panfilo, Sonia Baggio
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/Suppl. 1
Language English Pages 25 P. 151-175 File size 452 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2020-001-S1009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Relatively little research has addressed questions on how companies integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) and management control, and this study attempts to respond to recent calls for further investigation. Taking the perspective, advanced in the extant literature, that CSR can be regarded as a form of management control, the study has the objective to show how a socially responsible initiative, such as the implementation of an employee welfare plan undertaken by a SME, can address control issues. In particular, the company has designed the employee welfare plan as an incentive system. The study adopts an interventionist research (IVR) approach to accomplish with the research objective, and the results of the interventionist case study are interpreted based on the Merchant and Van der Stede object-of-control framework. In particular, results indicate that the implementation of the welfare plan has enabled the application of different types of control and provided incentive-related benefits, suggesting the potential impact of CSR as a management control device.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility, management control systems, employee welfare, interventionist research.

  1. Aguilera R.V., Rupp D.E., Williams C.A., Ganapathi J. (2007), Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 32, 3, pp. 836-863.
  2. Aguinis H. (2011), Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well, in Zedeck S. editor, APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Washington, APA.
  3. Albelda E. (2011), The role of management accounting practices as facilitators of the environmental management: evidence from EMAS organisations, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2, 1, pp. 76-100. DOI: 10.1108/20408021111162137
  4. Ali I., Rehman K.U., Ali S.I., Yousaf J., Zia M. (2010), Corporate social responsibility influences, employee commitment and organizational performance, African Journal of Business Management, 4, 13, pp. 2796-2801.
  5. Alvesson M., Kärreman D. (2004), Interfaces of control. Technocratic and socio-ideological control in a global management consultancy firm, Accounting, Organization and Society, 29, 3-4, pp. 423-444. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00034-5
  6. Anthony R.A., Govindarajan V. (2007), Management Control Systems, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  7. Arjaliès D.L., Mundy J. (2013), The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective, Management Accounting Research, 24, 4, pp. 284-300.
  8. Abernethy M., Brownell P. (1997), Management control systems in research and development organizations: the role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls, Accounting, Organization, Society, 22, 3-4, pp. 233-248. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00038-4
  9. Baard V., Dumay J. (2018), Interventionist research in accounting: reflections on the good, the bad and the ugly, Accounting & Finance.
  10. Baiesi L. (2015), Welfare Aziendale: Lo Scenario Europeo e le Sue Prospettive Future, Bologna, Impronta Etica.
  11. Bass A.E., Milosevic I. (2018), The ethnographic method in CSR research: The role and importance of methodological fit, Business & Society, 57, 1, pp. 174-215. DOI: 10.1177/0007650316648666
  12. Berry A., Coad A., Harris E., Otley D., Stringer C. (2009), Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature, British Accounting Review, 41, 1, pp. 2-20.
  13. Bracci E. (2017), The practical relevance of public sector research: The potential contributions of the interventionist approach, Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 11, 30, pp. 4-13.
  14. Brammer S., Millington A., Rayton B. (2007), The contribution of corporation social responsibility to organizational commitment, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 10, pp. 1701-1719. DOI: 10.1080/09585190701570866
  15. Campanale C., Cinquini L., Tenucci A. (2014), Time-driven activity-based costing to improve transparency and decision making in healthcare: A case study, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11, 2, pp. 165-186. DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0036
  16. Campbell J.L. (2007), Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review, 32, 3, pp. 946-967.
  17. Chapple W., Moon J. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia - A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting, Business & Society, 44, 4, pp. 415-441. DOI: 10.1177/0007650305281658
  18. Chenhall R.H. (2003), Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future, Accounting Organization Society, 28, 2-3, pp. 127-168. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
  19. Chiucchi M.S. (2013), Intellectual capital accounting in action: enhancing learning through interventionist research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 48-68. DOI: 10.1108/14691931311289011
  20. Choi Y., Yu Y. (2014), The influence of perceived corporate sustainability practices on employees and organizational performance, Sustainability, 6, 1, pp. 348-364.
  21. Costas J., Kärreman D. (2013), Coscience as control-managing employees through CSR, Organization, 20, 3, pp. 394-415. DOI: 10.1177/1350508413478584
  22. Crutzen N., Zvezdov D., Schaltegger S. (2017), Sustainability and management control. Exploring and theorizing control patterns in large European firms, Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, pp. 1291-1301.
  23. Dumay J., Baard V. (2017), An introduction to interventionist research in accounting, in Hoque Z., Parker L.D., Covaleski M.A., Haynes K. eds., The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods, Abingdon, Routledge.
  24. Dupire M., M’Zali B. (2018). CSR strategies in response to competitive pressures. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, pp. 603-623.
  25. Ferreira A., Otley D. (2009), The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis, Management Accounting Research, 20, 4, pp. 263-282.
  26. Fiorentino R., Garzella S., Lamboglia R., Mancini D. (2016), Strategie di sostenibilità: dalle motivazioni ai sistemi di misurazione della performance, Management Control, 2, pp. 115-142. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-002006
  27. Frederick W.C. (1994), From CSR1 to CSR2: the maturing of business-and-society thought, Business & Society, 33, 2, pp. 150-164.
  28. Frynas J.G. (2015). Strategic CSR, value creation and competitive advantage, in Lawton T.C., Rajwani T.S. eds., The Routledge Companion to Non-Market Strategy, Abingdon, Routledge.
  29. Gatti M., Chiucchi M.S., Montemari M. (2018), Management Control Systems and Integrated Reporting: Which relationships? The case of the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, International Journal of Business and Management, 13, 9, pp. 169-181.
  30. Gond J.P., Grubnic S., Herzig C., Moon J. (2012), Configuring management control system: theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability, Management Accounting Research, 23, 3, pp. 205-223.
  31. Gond J.P., El Akremi A., Swaen V., Babu N. (2017), The psychological microfoundation of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, pp. 225-246.
  32. Gray R. (2010), Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability. And how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 1, pp. 47–62.
  33. Hosada M. (2018), Management control systems and corporate social responsibility: perspectives from a Japanese small company, Corporate Governance: The international Journal of Business in Society, 18, 1, pp. 68-80. DOI: 10.1108/CG-05-2017-0105
  34. Jansen E.P. (2015), Participation, accounting and learning how to implement a new vision, Management Accounting Research, 29, pp. 45-60.
  35. Jönsson S., Lukka K. (2005), Doing interventionist research in management accounting, GRI-rapport 2005:6, Gothenburg, Gothenburg Research Institute.
  36. Jönsson S., Lukka K. (2007), There and back again: doing interventionist research in management accounting, in Chapman C.S., Hopwood A.G. and Shields M.D. editors, Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, Volume 1, Oxford, Elsevier.
  37. Langfield-Smith K. (1997), Management control systems and strategy: a critical review, Accounting Organization Society, 22, pp. 207-232. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(95)00040-2
  38. Lee M.D.P. (2008), A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead, International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 1, pp. 53-73.
  39. Lisi I.E., Cifalinò A. (2017), Exploring the use of Social and Environmental Performance Indicators by European companies, Management Control, 3, pp. 53-86. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2017-003004
  40. Lombardi R., Bruno A., Mainolfi G., Moretta Tartaglione A. (2015). Research perspectives on corporate reputation and company’s performance measurement. An interpretive framework, Management Control, 3, pp. 51-66. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2015-003004
  41. Lueg R., Radlach R. (2016), Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review, European Management Journal, 34, 2, pp. 158-171.
  42. Maas K., Schaltegger S., Crutzen N. (2016), Advancing the integration of sustainability measurement, management and reporting, Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, pp. 859-862.
  43. Malmi T., Brown D. (2008), Management control systems as a package. Opportunities, challenges and research directions, Management Accounting Research, 19, 4, pp. 287-300.
  44. Malmi T.,Granlund M. (2009), In search of management accounting theory, European Accounting Review, 18, 3, pp. 597-620. DOI: 10.1080/09638180902863779
  45. Marchi L. (2019). Governo delle aziende e creazione di valore: da una prospettiva finanziaria ad una prospettiva economico-sociale, Management Control, 1, pp. 5-16. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2019-001001
  46. Merchant K.A., Van der Stede W.A. (2003), Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. Harlow, Prentice Hall.
  47. Merchant K.A., Van der Stede W.A. (2007), Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (2nd edition). Harlow, Prentice Hall.
  48. Merchant K.A., Chen C.X. (2010), Strategy mapping: An interventionist examination of a homebuilder's performance measurement and incentive systems, Oxford, Elsevier-CIMA.
  49. Mio C. (2005), Corporate Social Responsability e sistema di controllo: verso l'integrazione, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  50. Murillo D., Lozano J.M. (2006), SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words, Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 3, pp. 227-240.
  51. Otley D., Soin K. (2014), Management control and uncertainty, in Otley D. and Soin K. editors, Management Control and Uncertainty, London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  52. Perrini F. (2006), SMEs and CSR theory: Evidence and implications from an Italian perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 3, pp. 305-316.
  53. Perrini F., Tencati A. (2006), Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 5, pp. 296-308.
  54. Picard R.R., Reis P. (2002), Management control systems design: a metaphorical integration of national cultural implications, Managerial Auditing Journal, 17, 5, pp. 222-233. DOI: 10.1108/02686900210429632
  55. Reverte C., Gómez-Melero E., Cegarra-Navarro J.G. (2016), The influence of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: evidence from Eco-Responsible Spanish firms, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4, pp. 2870-2884.
  56. Rupp D.E., Ganapathi J., Aguilera R.V., Williams C.A. (2006), Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 4, pp. 537-543.
  57. Rupp D.E., Williams, C., Aguilera, R. (2011), Increasing corporate social responsibility through stakeholder value internalization (and the catalyzing effect of new governance), in Schminke M. editor, Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality, New York, Routledge/Psychology Press.
  58. Schuler D.A., Cording M. (2006), A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers, Academy of Management Review, 31, 3, pp. 540-558.
  59. Strauss E., Zecher C. (2013), Management control systems: A review, Journal of Management Control, 23, 4, pp. 233-268.
  60. Suomala P., Lyly-Yrjänäinen J., Lukka K. (2014), Battlefield around interventions: A reflective analysis of conducting interventionist research in management accounting, Management Accounting Research, 25, 4, pp. 304-314.
  61. Thauer C.R. (2014), Goodness comes from within: Intra-organizational dynamics of corporate social responsibility, Business & Society, 53, 4, pp. 483-516. DOI: 10.1177/0007650313475770
  62. Tucker B., Thorne H., Gurd B. (2009), Management control systems and strategy. What's been happening? Journal of Accounting Literature, 28, pp. 123-133.
  63. Van Beurden P., Gössling T. (2008), The worth of values: A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 2, pp. 407-424.
  64. Wang Q., Dou J., Jia S. (2016), A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors, Business & Society, 55, 8, pp. 1083-1121. DOI: 10.1177/0007650315584317
  65. Westin O., Roberts H. (2010), Interventionist research – the puberty years: an introduction to the special issue, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7, 1, pp. 5-12. DOI: 10.1108/11766091011034253
  66. World Commission for Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

  • Does Entrepreneurs’ Darwinian Social Identity Contribute to Business Performance via Corporate Social Responsibility in China? The Role of Entrepreneurs’ Well-Being Jinliang Chen, Ning Chris Chen, Kangkang Yu, Colin Michael Hall, in Frontiers in Psychology 781399/2021
    DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781399
  • Viability of sustainable logistics practices enabling circular economy: A system dynamics approach Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna, Duzgun Agdas, Les Dawes, in Business Strategy and the Environment /2024 pp.3422
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3655
  • Study on Employee Welfare Services and Schemes in a Small Size Organization Pritha Agrawal, Dr. Shantanu Bose, in International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology 11673/2023 pp.480
    DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-11673
  • Management Control Practices as Performance Facilitators in a Crisis Context Adelaide Martins, Cidália Oliveira, Rui Silva, Manuel Castelo Branco, in Administrative Sciences /2023 pp.163
    DOI: 10.3390/admsci13070163

Chiara Mio, Antonio Costantini, Silvia Panfilo, Sonia Baggio, CSR and management control integration. Evidence from an employee welfare plan implementation in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" Suppl. 1/2020, pp 151-175, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2020-001-S1009