Collective action, social change, and Allport’s "master problem" as it confronts community psychology

Titolo Rivista PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’
Autori/Curatori Craig McGarty, Emma F. Thomas
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 7 P. 11-17 Dimensione file 148 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSC2021-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In this short introduction we address four major issues for community psychologists to consider when addressing social change: a) Collective action is about social categories; b) Online technology gives to and takes away from collective action; c) Actions change the world but actions are themselves subject to change; and d) Beliefs, emotion and identity are both in-puts to and outputs of action.

In questa breve introduzione affrontiamo quattro questioni principali che gli psicologi di comunità devono considerare quando affrontano il tema del cambiamento sociale: a) l’azione collettiva che riguarda le categorie sociali; b) la tecnologia online che dà e toglie all’azione col-lettiva; c) le azioni che cambiano il mondo ma le azioni stesse sono soggette al cambiamento; e d) le credenze, le emozioni e l’identità sono sia input che output dell’azione.

Keywords:azione collettiva; cambiamento sociale; identità sociale; comportamento online; opinion-based groups.

  1. Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2013). The influence of the Internet on the psychosocial predictors of collective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 373-388.
  2. Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 43-59. DOI: 10.1177/136843021558143
  3. Allport, F. H. (1962). A structuronomic conception of behavior: Individual and collective: I. Structural theory and the master problem of social psychology. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(1), 3-30. 
  4. Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K., & Muntele, D. (2007). Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 19-32.
  5. Bongiorno, R., McGarty, C., Kurz, T., Haslam, S.A., & Sibley, C.G. (2016), Mobilizing cause supporters through group‐based interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 203-215. 
  6. Chayinska, M., & McGarty, C. (2021), The power of political déjà vu: When collective action becomes an effort to change the future by preventing the return of the past. Political Psychology, 42, 201-217. 
  7. Fattori, F., Pozzi, M., Marzana, D., & Mannarini, T. (2015) A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 907-917.
  8. Lizzio-Wilson, M., Thomas, E. F., Louis, W. R., Wilcockson, B., Amiot, C. E., Moghaddam, F. M., & McGarty, C. (2021). How collective-action failure shapes group heterogeneity and engagement in conventional and radical action over time. Psychological Science, 32 (4), 519-535. DOI: 10.1177/095679762097056
  9. McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M., Thomas, E. F., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion‐based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 839-857.
  10. McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Smith, L. G., & Bliuc, A. M. (2014). New technologies, new identities, and the growth of mass opposition in the Arab Spring. Political Psychology, 35, 725-740.
  11. Morselli, D., Passini, S., & McGarty, C. (2020). Sos Venezuela: an analysis of the anti-Maduro protest movements using Twitter. Social Movement Studies.  DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2020.177007
  12. Odağ, Ö, Uluğ, Ö.M & Solak N., (2016) “Everyday I’m Çapuling”: Identity and collective action through social network sites in the Gezi park protests in Turkey. Journal of Media Psychology, 28,148-159.
  13. Schumann, S., & Klein, O. (2015). Substitute or stepping stone? Assessing the impact of low‐threshold online collective actions on offline participation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 308-322.
  14. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331, DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.31
  15. Smith, L. G. E., Thomas, E. F. & McGarty, C. (2015), “We Must Be the Change We Want to See in the World”: Integrating Norms and Identities through Social Interaction. Political Psychology, 36, 543-557.
  16. Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 75-88. DOI: 10.1177/136843021561221
  17. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lala, G., Stuart, A., Hall, L. J., & Goddard, A. (2015). Whatever happened to Kony2012? Understanding a global Internet phenomenon as an emergent social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 356-367.
  18. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Louis, W. (2014). Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 15-22.
  19. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 194-218. DOI: 10.1177/108886830934156
  20. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. (2016). Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19, 137-151. DOI: 10.1177/136843021561221
  21. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Stuart, A., Smith, L. G. E., & Bourgeois, L. (2019). Reaching consensus promotes the internalization of commitment to social change. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 615-630. DOI: 10.1177/136843021878032
  22. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. DOI: 10.1037/00332909.134.4.50

Craig McGarty, Emma F. Thomas, Collective action, social change, and Allport’s "master problem" as it confronts community psychology in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 2/2021, pp 11-17, DOI: 10.3280/PSC2021-002002