Sustainable development factors and features of resolving grain trade disputes in the WTO

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Assem Akhmetova, Zulfiya Baimagambetova
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/1 T.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 17 P. 47-63 Dimensione file 157 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2023-001-S1004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Kazakhstani grain market is an integral part of the agro-food complex (AFC) func- tioning in a difficult macroeconomic situation and requires the establishment of a pricing policy for grain products, the liberalization of trade in grain and processed products, taking into account the scale of effective demand and the standard of living of the population. The relevance of the problem stated in the article is due to the acquisition of profitable opportunities, but with high competitiveness requirements and the risks of being a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Purpose. The purpose of the article is to study the theoretical as well as scientific and meth- odological foundations for the grain market development with an assessment of the existing practice of applying WTO system agreements on disputes over trade in grain and its products. Methods. Using the methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison, the individual stages and the procedure for resolving grain disputes are studied tak- ing into account the experience of countries participating in grain disputes. The arti- cle describes the issues of functioning of the grain products market in Kazakhstan. As a result of the study, it was possible to find out that the methods of settling trade and improving the existing legal system through the analysis of WTO dispute reso- lution resources positively affect the development of the agricultural sector in Ka- zakhstan. The development of new trade rules within the WTO framework provides access to the global market for agricultural products and provides assistance on the scale of regional trade agreements.

Keywords:World Trade Organization, stages of the trade dispute resolution process, export and import of grain, grain trade disputes, world trade relations, global trading.

  1. Patyka N., Khodakivska O., Mohylnyi O. and Pugachov M. (2021). Ukraine’s Agrarian Sector in the Conditions of COVID-19 Distribution and Restrictive Quarantine Measures: Methodological Principles of Empirical Evaluation. Sci- entific Horizons, 24(12): 55-69.
  2. Pokrovskaya N.V. (2021). Legal mechanism for resolving trade disputes within the WTO. Issues of Russian and International Law, 11: 227-233.
  3. Program for the development of the agro-industrial complex in the Republic of Ka- zakhstan for 2013-2020 (2012). -- Text available at the website https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/ru/c/LEX-FAOC200801/ June 13, 2023.
  4. Reich A. (2017). The effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement system: a statisti- cal analysis. Fiesolana: European University Institute.
  5. Rovnov Y. (2022). DSU article 11 violations: A statistical exercise. Journal of In- ternational Economic Law, 25: 409-423.
  6. Sacerdoti G. (2019). Solving the WTO dispute settlement system crisis. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 20: 785-791.
  7. Schnepf R.D. (2007). US-Canada WTO corn trade dispute. Washington: Congres- sional Research Service.
  8. Shaffer G. and Go H.S. (2021). How China took on the United States and Europe at the WTO. In: Emerging powers and the world trading system: The past and fu- ture of international economic law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Shahini E., Luhovyi S., Kalynychenko H., Starodubets O. and Trybrat R. (2023). Rational use of oilseed waste to increase dairy productivity. International Jour- nal of Environmental Studies, 80(2): 442-450. DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2022.2147727
  10. Sigarev M.I. and Narynbayeva A.S. (2016). Experience and prospects for the devel- opment of agricultural insurance in the member countries of the customs union. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, 3: 168-174.
  11. Steger D. (2008). The WTO dispute settlement system: Jurisdiction, interpretation and remedies. In: Reform of the dispute settlement system 3. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press.
  12. Trusova N.V., Hryvkivska O.V., Yavorska T.I., Prystemskyi O., Kepko V.N. and Prus Y.O. (2020). Innovative development and competitiveness of agribusiness subjects in the system of ensuring of economic security of the regions of Ukraine. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, (2): 141-156. DOI: 10.3280/RISS2020-002-S1011
  13. Trusova N.V., Prystemskyi O.S., Hryvkivska O.V., Sakun A.Zh. and Kyrylov Y.Y. (2021). Modeling of system factors of financial security of agricultural enter- prises of Ukraine. Regional Science Inquiry, 13(1): 169-182.
  14. Vinichenko I.I., Trusova N.V., Kurbatska L.M., Polehenka M.A. and Oleksiuk V.O. (2020). Imperatives of quality insuring of the production cycle and effective functioning process of the enterprises of agro-product subcomplex of Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 11(4): 1462-1481.
  15. Ababakr A. (2022). Global trade governance and WTO: Beyond the model of the club. Asian Social Science, 18: 1-32.
  16. Akhmetova A.A., Esplyuges Mota K.A. and Baymagambetova Z.M. (2022). The practice of applying World Trade Organization agreements in grain trade dis- putes. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Repub- lic of Kazakhstan, 69: 185-194.
  17. Azkhodzhayeva R.A. (2022). The history of the development of the world trade or- ganization and its significance in international law. Journal of Legal Studies, 2: 104-110.
  18. Beghin J.C. and Schweizer H. (2021). Agricultural trade costs. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43: 500-530.
  19. Belgibayeva A., Denissova O., Kozlova M., Savchenko I., Tleubayev A. and Siximbayeva G. (2022). Analysis of Sustainable Development of SMEs in Agri- culture. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(3): 681-694.
  20. Brewster R. (2019). WTO dispute settlement: Can we go back again? AJIL Unbound, 113: 61-66.
  21. Busch M.L. and Reinhardt E. (2003). Developing countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement. Journal of World Trade, 37: 719-735.
  22. Danchuk V.D., Kozak L.S. and Danchuk M.V. (2015). Stress testing of business activity using the synergetic method of risk assessment. Actual Problems of Economics, 171(9): 189-198.
  23. Davey W.J. (2009). Compliance problems in WTO dispute settlement. Cornell In- ternational Law Journal, 42: 119-128.
  24. Denissova O., Konurbayeva Z., Zakimova A. and Rakhimberdinova M. (2021). Evaluation of import substitution potential of products from secondary raw ma- terials of animal husbandry. Journal of Environmental Management and Tour- ism, 12(2): 341-356.
  25. Food security and nutrition around the world in 2020 (2020). -- Text available at the website https://www.fao.org/3/ca9692en/online/ca9692en.html#chapter-IV.1_1 June 11, 2023.
  26. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (1994). -- Text available at the web- site https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/06-gatt_e.htm June 10, 2023.
  27. World Trade Organization Secretariat (2017). A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Set- tlement System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. WTO documents online (2023). -- Text available at the website https://docs.wto.org June 15, 2023.
  29. Zelenska K. (2018). External factors with influence on Ukrainian grain policies. In: Grain Subsidies in Ukraine. Leiden: Brill.
  30. Zhanabayeva Zh.K. and Mamyrbayev O. (2019). The grain market and its im- portance in ensuring the food security of Kazakhstan. Actual problems and pro- spects for the development of the economy: Russian and foreign experience, 20: 26-29.
  31. Glauber J. and Lester S. (2021). China-tariff rate quotas for certain agricultural prod- ucts. Against the grain: Can the WTO open Chinese markets? A contaminated experiment. World Trade Review, 20: 405-420.
  32. Gonzalez A. (2019). Bridging the divide between developed and developing coun- tries in WTO negotiations. Peterson Institute for International Economics. -- Text available at the website https://goo.su/FzG99 June 12, 2023.
  33. Gusakov V.G., Baygot L.N., Baygot M.S., Kireyenko N.V., Snopkova I.N. and Kar- povich N.V. (2011). Activation of foreign trade in agricultural products and food. In: Scientific Principles of AFC Development Regulation: Proposals and Imple- mentation Mechanisms. Minsk: Institute for System Research in the Agroindus- trial Complex.
  34. Hoekman B. and Mavroidis P.C. (2019). Burning down the house? The appellate body in the centre of the WTO crisis. Florence: Robert Schuman Centre for Ad- vanced Studies Research (RSCAS).
  35. Hopewell K. (2022). Heroes of the developing world? Emerging powers in WTO agriculture negotiations and dispute settlement. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49: 561-584.
  36. İsmayilov V., Shalbuzov N., Karimova V., Safarov A. and Cabbarli L. (2022). Gov- ernment agencies in the field of sustainable agricultural development in various countries. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, (2): 165-183. DOI: 10.3280/RISS2022-002011
  37. Kerimkhulle S., Saliyeva A., Makhazhanova U., Kerimkulov Z., Adalbek A. and Taberkhan R. (2023). The input-output analysis for the wholesale and retail trade industry of the Kazakhstan statistics. E3S Web of Conferences, 376, 05023.
  38. Khan Yu.A. (2016). Organization of transport corridors for the export of Kazakh grain. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University, 16: 10- 16.
  39. Khushvakhtzoda K. (2022). Analysis of Modern Instruments for Strategic Management Accounting at Agricultural Enterprises. Scientific Horizons, 25(9): 126-133.
  40. Kirilenko V.P., Mishalchenko Yu.V. and Shchepova A.N. (2021). International legal and economic aspects of dispute resolution within the framework of the WTO in the context of international integration. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 2: 64-71.
  41. Kołacz R., Iakubchak O., Taran T. and Hryb J. (2023). Safety and quality indicators of rapeseed and sunflower honey from different regions of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 14(1): 39-56.
  42. Konurbayeva Z., Denissova O., Rakhimberdinova M. and Zakimova A. (2018). Food security as a formation factor of the import substitution potential of the economy. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13(8): 2251-2260.
  43. Kopytets N. and Voloshyn V. (2022). Price trends in the pork market. Scientific Bul- letin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 9(3): 20-29.
  44. Kryvenko N. (2022). Development of trade and economic relations of the BSEC countries. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Econom- ics”, 9(1): 9-23.
  45. Liasota V., Bohatko N., Tkachuk S., Bukalova N. and Khitska O. (2022). Effective- ness of detergents and disinfectants in the production of cow’s milk. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 13(3): 25-33.
  46. Lobanov P.A. (2022). Directions for the development of public-private partnership in the EAEU as a factor of integration. Social Innovations and Social Sciences, 2: 31-45.
  47. Lupenko Y., Khodakivska O., Nechyporenko O. and Shpykuliak O. (2022). The State and Trends of Agricultural Development in the Structure of the National Economy of Ukraine. Scientific Horizons, 25(6): 121-128.
  48. Mukhambetov T., Yerdavletova F., Kurbanova K., Mukhametzhanova Z. and Sadvakassova K. (2020). Analysis of financial indicators used to assess the sus- tainability of companies. E3S Web of Conferences, 208, 03049.
  49. Neeraj R.S. (2019). A defining act: How TPP rules are undermining WTO jurispru- dence. Journal of World Trade, 53: 169-185.

Assem Akhmetova, Zulfiya Baimagambetova, Sustainable development factors and features of resolving grain trade disputes in the WTO in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1 T./2023, pp 47-63, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2023-001-S1004