Group attachment and its inner working model Developing a projective test to measure mental representations of group attachment based on the AAP

Author/s Christine Iuga
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2023/3
Language English Pages 15 P. 99-113 File size 680 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSOB2023-003007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Is there any difference between dyadic and group attachment? Following Bowlby’s (1982) beliefs, attachment is important across the lifespan: dependent on the early sensitive caregiving, we seek out for others ( family members, peer groups and lovers) to fulfill our different needs. The refined mental representations also include our experiences of receiving protection and care in groups and influence our perception and action in future situations. Based upon the AAP (George, 1999), which provides a developmental approach to the assessment of the dyadic adult attachment system, this study tries to extend the projective test by measuring patterns of group attachment. The AGAP-Test (Adult Group Attachment Projective Picture Test) contains a series of eight pictures that activate the unconscious “group attachment system” and tries to give via patients narrative insight in secure, insecure or disorganized schemes and defensive processes against anxiety, suffering and pain in repeated former experiences in groups. The AGAP Test is currently in development and used in the measurement of the change of group attachment related mental representations in individuals during long-term psychodynamic group therapy. The second approach tries to give insight into attachment related social unconscious processes such as defense and coherence via guiding the “group as unity” to absolve the projective test. For the “healthy” reference groups, the narratives of eight group analytic trainee groups at the GRAS (Gruppenanalyseseminar e.V.) Institute in Bonn, Germany, have been collected. To illustrate the effectiveness of aspects relevant to group attachment, the test is also frequently used in the supervision and further training of adult student groups.

Keywords: Group attachment; AGAP; narrative assessment

  1. Gruber N., Kreuzpointner L. (2013). Measuring the reliability of Picture Story Exercises like the TAT. PLoS One, 8(11): e79450.
  2. Hilsenroth M.J. (2004). Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Grossmann K., Grossmann K. (2012). Bindungendas Gefüge psychischer Sicherheit. Stuttgart: KlettCotta.
  4. Akhtar S., Kramer S. (1997). The Seasons of Life: Separation-Individuation Perspectives. London: Karnac.
  5. Ammaniti M., Gallese V. (2014). The Birth of Intersubjectivity. Psychodynamics, Neurobiology, and the Self. London: Norton.
  6. Badenoch B., Gantt S. (2013). The interpersonal neurobiology of group psychotherapy and group process. London: Karnac.
  7. Bateman A., Fonagy P. (2016). Mentalization based treatment for personality disorders: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Bowlby J. (1980). Verlust, Trauer und Depression. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
  9. Braus D.F. (2014). Einblick ins Gehirn. Stuttgart: Thieme.
  10. Brisch K.H. (hrsg.) (2018). Die Machtder Gruppenbindungen. Stuttgart: KlettCotta.
  11. Buchheim A. (2016). Bindung und Exploration. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
  12. Buchheim A., Kächele H., Cierpka M., Münte T.F., Kessler H., Wiswede D., Taubner S., Bruns G., Roth G. (2008). Psychoanalyse und Neurowissenschaften: Neurobiologische Veränderungsprozesse bei psychoanalytischen Behandlungen von depressiven Patienten. Nervenheilkunde, 27(5): 441-445.
  13. Cramer P. (2004). Storrytelling, Narrative and the Thematic Apperception Test. New York: The Guilford Press.
  14. De Dreu C., Shalvi S., Greer L.L., Van Kleef G.A., Handgraaf M.J. (2012). Oxytocin
  15. motivates non-cooperation in intergroup conflict to protect vulnerable in-group members. PLoS One, 7(11): e46751.
  16. Ehrenthal J.C., Dinger U., Horsch L., Komo­Lang M., Klinkerfuß M., Grande T., Schauenburg H. (2011). Der OPD-Strukturfragebogen (OPD-SF): Erste Ergebnisse zu Reliabilität und Validität. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 62: 25-32.
  17. Elias N. (1990). Etablierte und Außenseiter. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
  18. Emde R.N. (2009). From ego to “we-go”: Neurobiology and questions for psychoanalysis: Commentary on papers by Trevarthen, Gallese, and Ammaniti & Trentini. Psychoanalytic dialoques, 19: 556-564. DOI: 10.1080/10481880903232009
  19. Foulkes S.H. (1978). Praxis der gruppenanalytischen Psychotherapie. Frankfurt am Main: Klotz.
  20. Fuchs T. (2018). Leib, Raum, Person: Entwurf einer phänomenologischen Anthropologie. Stuttgart: KlettCotta.
  21. Friedman R. (2018). Beyond rejection, glory and the Soldier’s Matrix: the heart of my group analysis. Group Analysis, 51(4): 389-405. DOI: 10.1177/053331641879248
  22. Friston K. (2010). The free energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2): 127-138.
  23. George C., West M. (2012). The Adult Attachment Projective Picture System. New York: The Guilford Press.
  24. Hopper E. (2003). The Social Unconscious. London: Kingsley.
  25. Hühn P., Meister J.C., Pier J. (eds.) (2014). Handbook of Narratology, vol. 2. BerlinBoston: de Cruyter.
  26. Kandel E. (2001). The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialoque between genes and synapses. Science, 294(5544): 1034-1038.
  27. Mahler M., Pine F., Bergman A. (1978). Die psychische Geburt des Menschen. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
  28. Marmarosh C., Markin R., Spiegel E. (2013). Attachment in Group Psychotherapy. American Psychological Association.
  29. Mikulincer M., Shaver P. (2013). Mechanisms of social connection. From brain to group. American Psychological Association.
  30. Morina N., Schnyder U., Schick M., Nickerson A., Bryant R.A. (2016). Attachment style and interpersonal trauma in refugees. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 50(12): 1161-1168. DOI: 10.1177/0004867416631432
  31. Muhs A. (2018). Entwicklungen in der analytischen Psychotherapie. Vielfalt in ihren Anwendungen und Vielfalt in der Forschung. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
  32. Nohl A.M. (2017). Interview und Dokumentarische Methode. Anleitungen für die
  33. Forschungspraxis (V ed.) Wiesbaden: Springer.
  34. Roeder H. (2018). Das Erzählen in frühen Hochkulturen, vol. II: Eine Archäologie der narrative Sinnbildung. Leiden: Brill | Fink.
  35. Schultz­Venrath U. (2016). Mentalisieren in Gruppen. Stuttgart: KlettCotta.
  36. Smith E., Murphy J., Coats S. (1999). Attachment to Groups: Theory and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1): 94-110. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.1.94
  37. Rohr E. (2006). Scham und Individuation in der Migration. Gruppenanalyse, 16(1): 10-28.
  38. Rudolf G. (2012). Strukturbezogene Psychotherapie. Leitfaden zur psychodynamischen Therapie struktureller Störungen (III ed.). Stuttgart: Schattauer.
  39. Schlicht T., Smortchkova J. (hrsg.) (2018). Mentale Repräsentationen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
  40. Staats H., Dally A., Bolm T. (2014). Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppenanalyse. Göttingen: V/R.
  41. Strauß B., Schauenburg H. (2017). Bindung in Psychologie und Medizin. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
  42. Strauß B., Mattke D. (2012). Gruppenpsychotherapie. Heidelberg: Springer.
  43. Van Iyzendoorn M., De Wolff M. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A metaanalysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68(4): 571-591.
  44. Vogt R. (2016). Täterbindung: Gruppentherapie und soziale Neurobiologie. Kröning: Asanger.
  45. Wilke G. (2017). Ordnung und Chaos in Gruppen. Wien-Zürich: LIT Verlag.
  46. Winnicott D.W. (1974). Reifungsprozesse und fördernde Umwelt. Gießen: Psychosozial.

Christine Iuga, Group attachment and its inner working model Developing a projective test to measure mental representations of group attachment based on the AAP in "PSICOBIETTIVO" 3/2023, pp 99-113, DOI: 10.3280/PSOB2023-003007