Some reflections on the capitalist labour process, nature and social reproduction

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Autori/Curatori Elena Baglioni
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2023/167
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 24 P. 9-32 Dimensione file 286 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2023-167001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This article suggests that Labour Process Theory (LPT) could engage more substantially with the spheres of ecology and social reproduction. By drawing on ecological and feminist Marxist literatures, it seeks to recast a materialist analysis of the capitalist labour process, which is reconstructed as an ecological process as well as a process structurally shaped by spaces and institutions where the social reproduction of workers and the working class take place. Drawing from the collective and individual work done over the last few years within these areas, the article translates abstract observations in more operative analytical categories by reinstating the relevance of socio-ecological indeterminacy of the labour process, the materiality of the body, the commodity and the workplace, the intertwining between exploitation and disciplining and by introducing the notion of reproductive subsumption.

Keywords:Labour process theory, ecology, social reproduction, materiality

  1. Ba’ S. (2019). The Struggle to Reconcile Precarious Work and Parenthood: The Case of Italian ‘Precarious Parents’, Work, Employment and Society, 33(5): 812–828. DOI: 10.1177/095001701984308
  2. Baglioni E. (2018). Labour control and the labour question in global production networks: Exploitation and disciplining in Senegalese export horticulture. Journal of Economic Geography 18(1): 111–137.
  3. Baglioni E. (2022). The making of cheap labour across production and reproduction: control and resistance in the Senegalese horticultural value chain. Work, Employment and Society. 3(3): 445–464. DOI: 10.1177/095001702199956
  4. Baglioni E., Campling L. (2017). Natural resource industries as global value chains: Frontiers, fetishism, labour and the state. Environment and Planning A, 49(11): 2437–2456. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X1772851
  5. Baglioni E., Campling L., Mezzadri A., Miyamura S., Pattenden J., Selwyn B. (2022). Exploitation and Labour Regimes: Production, Circulation, Social Reproduction, Ecology, in Baglioni E., Campling L., Coe N.M., Smith A. (eds) Labour Regimes and Global Production, Agenda Publishing.
  6. Banaji J. (2010). Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation. Leiden: Brill.
  7. Barca S. (2020). Forces of Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/978110887837
  8. Barca S., Bridge G. (2015). Industrialisation and environmental change. In T. Perreault, G. Bridge & J. McCarthy (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, 366– 77. Abingdon: Routledge.
  9. Bhattacharya T. (2015). How Not To Skip Class: Social Reproduction of Labor and the Global Working Class, Viewpoint Mgazine, -- [Available at: https://viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/how-not-to-skip-class-social-reproduction-of-labor-and-the-global-working-class/ last accessed June 2023]
  10. Bhattacharya T. (ed) (2017). Social Reproduction Theory, London: Pluto Press
  11. Braverman H. (1998) [1974]. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  12. Burkett P. (2014). Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. Chicago: Haymarket Books
  13. Bush B. (1990). Slave women in Carribbean Society, 1650-1838, London: James Currey
  14. Davis A. (1983). Women, Race and Class, New York: Vintage Books.
  15. Dedeoglu S. (2022). Cultivating Precarisation: Intersecting Vulnerabilities of Syrian Refugees in the Turkish Agricultural Sector, Work, Employment and Society, 36(2) 345–361. DOI: 10.1177/0950017021104129
  16. Dicken P. (2015). Global Shift. London: Sage.
  17. Durbin S., Conley H. (2010). Gender, Labour Process Theory and Intersectionality: Une Liaison Dangereuse?, in in P. Thompson and C. Smith (eds.) Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis, London: Palgrave.
  18. Elson D., Pearson R. (1981). Nimble fingers make cheap workers. Feminist Review, 7: 87–107.
  19. Federici S (2004). Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.
  20. Fortunati L (1981). L'arcano della riproduzione: casalinghe, prostitute, operai e capitale. Venezia: Marsilio Editori.
  21. Foster J.B. (2000). Marx’s Ecology, Ney York: monthly Review Press.
  22. Foster J.B. (2013). Marx and the Universal Metabolism of Nature, Monthly Review, 65(7):1-19.
  23. Foster J.B., Burkett P. (2000). The Dialectic of Organic/Inorganic Relations. Marx and the Hegelian Philosophy of Nature, Organization & Environment, 13(4): 403-425. DOI: 10.1177/108602660013400
  24. Fraser N. (2014). Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode. For an Expanded Conception of Capitalism, New Left Review, 86: 55-72.
  25. Hammer A., Fishwick A. (eds) (2020). The Political Economy of Work in the Global South, London: Macmillan International.
  26. Hochschield A.R. (2015). Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value, in Engster D., Metz T. (eds) Justice, Politics, and the Family, New York: Routledge
  27. Jana M., Hammer A. (2022). Reproductive Work in the Global South: Lived Experiences and Social Relations of Commercial Surrogacy in India, Work, Employment and Society, 2022, 36(5): 945–966. DOI: 10.1177/095001702199737
  28. James C.L.R. (2001) [1938]. The Black Jacobins, London: Penguin
  29. Kesküla E., Loogma K. (2017). The value of and values in the work of teachers in Estonia, Work, Employment and Society, 31(2) 248– 264. DOI: 10.1177/095001701667643
  30. Malm A. (2018). The Progress of This Storm. Nature and Society in a warming World. London: Verso.
  31. Marx K. (1990). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.
  32. Marx K. (2008). Critique of the Gotha Programme. Holicog: Wildside Press.
  33. McGrath S., DeFilippis J. (2009). Social reproduction as unregulated work, Work, Employment and Society, 23(1): 66–83. DOI: 10.1177/095001700809977
  34. Merchant C. (1980). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. London: Wildwood House.
  35. Mies M. (1982). The Lace Makers of Narsapur. London: Zed Books.
  36. Mies M. (1986). Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London: Zed.
  37. Mies M., Shiva V. (1993). Ecofeminism, London: Zed Books
  38. Moore J.W. (2010). Amsterdam is standing on Norway, Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(2): 188–227.
  39. Moore J.W. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital, London: Verso.
  40. Moore J.W. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism, Oakland: PM Press.
  41. Naidu S.C., Ossome L. (2016). Social reproduction and the agrarian question of women’s labour in India. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 5(1): 50–76. DOI: 10.1177/227797601665873
  42. Navarro Trujillo M.L. (2020). Notes for a Critical and Ecological View of Patriarchal Capitalism in the Web of Life, Capital and Class, 45(1): 21-32. DOI: 10.1177/0309816820929115
  43. Ngai P., Smith C. (2007). Putting transnational labour process in its place: the dormitory labour regime in post-socialist China, Work, Employment and Society, 21(1): 27–45. DOI: 10.1177/095001700707361
  44. Nichols R. (2015). Disaggregating Primitive Accumulation, Radical Philosophy, 196: 18-28.
  45. O’Laughlin B. (1977). Production and reproduction: Meillassoux’s ‘Femmes, greniers et capitaux’, Critique of Anthropology, 2: 3–32. DOI: 10.1177/0308275X770020080
  46. O’Laughlin B. (2013). Land, Labour and the production of affliction in rural Southern Africa, Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(1): 175– 96.
  47. Ollman B. (2003). Dance of the Dialectic, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  48. Plumwood V. (2003). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
  49. Wolkowitz C., Cohen R. L., Sanders T., Hardy K. (eds) (2013). Body/Sex/Work, Houndmills: Palgrave.
  50. Wolkowitz C., Warhurst C. (2010). ‘Embodying Labour’, in P. Thompson and C. Smith (eds.) Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis, London: Palgrave
  51. Vogel L. (2013). Marxism and the Oppression of Women. Towards a Unitary theory, Chicago: Haymarket books
  52. Thomson P., Smith C. (eds) (2010). Working Life. Renewing Labour Process Analysis. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  53. Thomson P., Smith C. (2009). Labour Power and Labour Process: Contesting the Marginality of the Sociology of Work, Sociology, 43(5): 913–93. DOI: 10.1177/003803850934072
  54. Thompson P. (2010). The capitalist labour process: Concepts and connections, Capital & Class, 34(1) 7–14. DOI: 10.1177/030981680935347
  55. Taylor P., Newsome K., Bair J., Rainnie A. (2015). Putting Labour in its Place: Labour process Analysis and Global Value Chains, in Newsome K., Taylor, P., Bair J., Rainnie A (eds) Putting Labour in its Place: Labour process Analysis and Global Value Chains, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  56. Smith C. (2015). Rediscovery of the Labour Process, Royal Holloway University of London Working Paper Series SoMWP-1501.
  57. Smith C. (2006). The double indeterminacy of labour power. Work, Employment and Society 20(2): 389–402. DOI: 10.1177/095001700606510
  58. Serafini P. (2023). Collective action, performance and the body-territory in Latin American feminisms, in Boyle K., Berridge S. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Gender, Media and Violence, London: Routledge ù
  59. Salleh A. (2010). From Metabolic Rift to Metabolic Value: Reflections on Environmental Sociology and the Alternative Globalization Movement, Organization and Environment, 23(2): 205–219. DOI: 10.1177/108602661037213
  60. Salleh A. (2017). Ecofeminism as Politics. Nature, Marx and the Post-Modern, London: Zed Books.
  61. Salleh A (2003). Ecofeminism as Sociology, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 14(1): 61-74. DOI: 10.1080/1045575030856551
  62. Saito K. (2017). Capital, Nature, and the Unfinished Critique of Political Economy, New York: Monthly Review Press.
  63. Reddock R. (1985). Women and Slavery in the Caribbean. A Feminist Perspective, Latin American Perspectives, 12(1): 63-80. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X850120010
  64. Portes Virginio F., Stewart P., Garvey B. (2022). Unpacking Super-Exploitation in the 21st Century: The Struggles of Haitian Workers in Brazil, Work, Employment and Society, Early view. DOI: 10.1177/095001702110607

Elena Baglioni, Some reflections on the capitalist labour process, nature and social reproduction in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 167/2023, pp 9-32, DOI: 10.3280/SL2023-167001