Resisting outsourcing: learning from migrant workers’ power-building strategies in the British service sector

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Autori/Curatori Davide Però
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2023/167
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 21 P. 100-120 Dimensione file 233 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2023-167005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This article focuses on an understudied aspect in labour process theory, that of workers’ collective contentious practices. In particular, it considers how workers can build power and induce change in regimes of outsourcing, which are particularly exploitative. Using Schmalz et al.’s (2018) typology of powers as a heuristic device, the article analytically describes how the outsourced migrant cleaners of British ‘indie unions’ have channelled their solidarity into collective actions and redressed some of the harshest conditions faced. Drawing on the power resources approach, the article highlights the importance of no longer assuming the production site as the only crucial arena for precarious workers’ power-building practices, as the relative autonomy of the workplace postulated in labour process theory would imply. Rather, this article suggests extending the analytical gaze outside the workplace to comprise the ‘community’ and the public sphere where workers’ contentious initiatives are also often staged and won.

Keywords:Indie unions, labour process theory, power resources approach, migrant and precarious workers

  1. Acciari L. and Però D. (2017). ‘Confronting Precariousness, Outsourcing and Exploitation – Lessons from the LSE cleaners’, Discover Society.
  2. Agar M. (1996). The Professional Stranger (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
  3. Ackroyd S. and Thompson P. (2022). Organizational Misbehaviour (2nd ed.). London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/978144622223
  4. Alberti G. (2016). Mobilizing and Bargaining at the Edge of Informality. Working USA, 19:81-103.
  5. Alberti G. and Però D. (2018). Migrating industrial relations: migrant workers’ initiative within and outside trade unions, British Journal of Industrial Relations 55(4):693-715.
  6. Atzeni M. (2010). Workplace conflict: Mobilization and solidarity in Argentina. Houndsmills: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1057/9780230281622
  7. Atzeni M. (2021). Workers’ organizations and the fetishism of the trade union form. Globalizations. 18(8):1349-1362. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2021.1877970
  8. Baglioni E. (2022). Exploitation and Labour Regimes: Production, Circulation, Social Reproduction, Ecology. In Baglioni E, Campling L and Smith A (eds) Labour Regimes and Global Production. Newcastle: Agenda.
  9. Baglioni, E., Mezzadri, A. (2020). Labour Control Regimes and Social Reproduction: Some Reflections on the Strengths and Weaknesses of an Evolving Framework. In A. Hammer, A. Fishwick, (eds), The Political Economy of Work in the Global South, London: Macmillan.
  10. Borghi P., Murgia A., Mondon-Navazo M. and Mezihorak P. (2021). Mind the gap between discourses and practices: platform workers’ representation in France and Italy. European Journal of Industrial Relations 27(4):425-443. DOI: 10.1177/0959680121100426
  11. Bowcott O. (2019). Ministry of Justice workers to stage a two-day strike over pay. The Guardian, 10-1-2019. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jan/10/ministry-of-justice-workers-to-stage-two-day-strike-over-pay
  12. Cant C. (2020). Riding for Deliveroo. Resistance in the new economy. London: Polity Press.
  13. Chun J. (2009). Organizing at the margins. Ithaca: Cornell UP. DOI: 10.7591/9780801458453
  14. Cini L., Maccarrone V. and Tassinari A. (2022). With or without U(nions)? Understanding the diversity of gig workers’ organizing practices in Italy and the UK. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(3):341-362. DOI: 10.1177/09596801211052531
  15. Contu A. (2008). Decaf resistance: On misbehavior, cynicism, and desire in liberal workplaces. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(3): 364-379. DOI: 10.1177/0893318907310941
  16. Dias-Abey M. (2021). Bridging the Spaces in-between? The IWGB and Strategic Litigation. Law Research Papers Series. University of Bristol.
  17. Doellegast V. and Greer I. (2007). Vertical disintegration and the disorganization of German industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 45(1): 55-76.
  18. Dorigatti L. and Greco L. (2022). I confini dell’impresa, il lavoro e le regole tra globale e locale. Sociologia del lavoro 164(3): 1-18.
  19. Drahokoupil J. (2015). Introduction, in Drahokoupil J. (ed.). The Outsourcing Challenge. Brussells: ETUI.
  20. Dundon T. and Rollinson D. (2011). Understanding Employment Relations (2nd ed). London: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Englert S., Woodcock J. and Cant C. (2020). Digital workerism: Technology, platforms, and the circulation of workers’ struggles. Triplec: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 18(1): 132-145.
  22. Ferree M., Gamson W., Rucht D. and Gerhards J. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: CUP.
  23. Fox-Hodess C. and Santibáñez Rebolledo C. (2020). The social foundations of structural power. Global Labour Journal, 11(3): 222-238.
  24. Gamson W.A. and Wolfsfeld G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1): 114-125. DOI: 10.1177/0002716293528001009
  25. Hearn J. and Bergos M. (2011). Latin American cleaners fight for survival. Race & Class, 53(1): 65-82. DOI: 10.1177/0306396811406782.
  26. Heery E., Williams S. and Abbott B. (2012). Civil society organizations and trade unions: cooperation, conflict, indifference. Work, Employment & Society 26(1): 145-160. DOI: 10.1177/0950017011426302
  27. Holgate J. (2015). Community organising in the UK: A ‘new’ approach for trade unions? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 36(3): 431-455. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X13511275
  28. Holgate J. (2021). Arise. Power, Strategy and Union Resurgence. London: Pluto.
  29. Hughes L. and Woodcock J. (2023). Trouble Making. London: Verso.
  30. Iannuzzi F.E. and Sacchetto D. (2022). Labour and production borders. Outsourcing in contemporary capitalism. Sociologia del lavoro. 164(3): 140-1761. DOI: 10.3280/SL2022-164008
  31. Jang Z. and Korczynski M. (2016). When the ‘unorganizable’ organize: The collective mobilization of migrant domestic workers. Human Relations 69(3): 813-838. DOI: 10.1177/0018726715600229
  32. Jaros S. (2005) Marxian Critiques of Thompson’s (1990) ‘core’ Labour Process Theory: An Evaluation and Extension, Ephemera. Theory & politics in organization 5(1): 5-25
  33. Juravich T. (2018). Constituting Challenges in Differing Arenas of Power. Labour Studies Journal, 43(2): 104-117. DOI: 10.1177/0160449X18763441
  34. Kalleberg A. (2013). Good jobs, bad jobs: the rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  35. Kelly J. (1998). Rethinking Industrial Relations. London: Routledge.
  36. Kirk E. (2018). The (re)organisation of conflict at work: Mobilisation, counter-mobilisation and the displacement of grievance expressions. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 39(4): 639-660. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X18777617
  37. Kirk E. (2020). Contesting ‘bogus self-employment’ via legal mobilisation: The case of foster care workers. Capital & Class, 44(4): 531-539. DOI: 10.1177/0309816820906395
  38. Lagnado J. (2016). Towards a History of the Latin American Workers Association 2002–12. In Choudry A. and Hlatshwayo M. (eds.), Just Work? London: Pluto, 106-128.
  39. López-Andreu M. (2020). Breaking fragmentation through mobilization: the development of a collective identity during Movistar’s contractors’ and technicians’ strike in Spain. Work, Employment and Society, 34(4): 661-677. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019866688
  40. Marotta A., Hughes L. (2018). Rebellion at the LSE: a cleaning sector inquiry, Notes from Below (1): https://notesfrombelow.org/article/rebellion-lse-cleaning-sector-inquiry
  41. Scott J. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI: 10.12987/9780300153569
  42. Shalmy S. (2018). Solidarity Forever. Red Pepper 222: 16-21.
  43. Martínez Lucio M. and Stewart P. (1997). The paradox of contemporary labour process theory: The rediscovery of labour and the disappearance of collectivism. Capital & Class, 21(2): 49-77. DOI: 10.1177/030981689706200104
  44. Martínez L.M., Marino S. and Connolly H. (2017). Organising as a strategy to reach precarious and marginalised workers. Transfer 23(1): 31-46. DOI: 10.1177/1024258916677880
  45. Miles, L., Freeman, T., Wan Teng, L., Mat Yasin, S., Ying, K. (2022). Empowerment as a pre-requisite to managing and influencing health in the workplace: The sexual and reproductive health needs of factory women migrant workers in Malaysia. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 43(4): 1676-1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X211024725
  46. Moyer-Lee J. and Lopez H. (2017). From invisible to invincible: the story of the 3 cosas campaign. In Lazar S (ed) Where Are the Unions? London: Zed, 231-250.
  47. Ness I. (2014). New Forms of Worker Organization. In Ness I., New Forms of Worker Organization. Oakland: PM, 1-17.
  48. Nowak J. (2021). From industrial relations research to Global Labour Studies: moving labour research beyond Eurocentrism. Globalizations, 18(8): 1335-1348. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2021.1874210
  49. Okely J. (2012). Anthropological Practice. Fieldwork and the ethnographic method. Oxford: Berg. DOI|: 10.4324/9781003084563
  50. Pannini E. (2023). Winning a battle against the odds: A cleaners’ campaign. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 44(1): 68-87.
  51. Però D. (2008). ‘Political Engagements of Latin Americans in the UK. Issues, Strategies and the Public Debate’, in Focaal – Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 51: 73-90.
  52. Però D. (2011). Migrants Practices of Citizenship and Policy Change. In Shore C., Wright S. and Però D., eds., Policy Worlds. Anthropology and Contemporary Power. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 244-263. DOI: 10.1515/9780857451170-016
  53. Però D. (2013). Migrants, Cohesion and the Cultural Politics of the State: Critical Perspectives on the Management of Diversity, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 39(8): 1241-1259.
  54. Però D. (2014). Class Politics and Migrants: Collective Action among New Migrant Workers in Britain, in Sociology, 48(6): 1156-1172. DOI: 10.1177/0038038514523519
  55. Però D. (2020). Indie Unions, Organizing and Labour Renewal: Learning from Precarious Migrant Workers, Work, Employment and Society, 34(5): 900-918. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019885075
  56. Però D. (2022). ‘New Labour Formations, Precarious Workers, and the Gig Economy. Lessons from British indie unions’. In Ness I., ed. The Routledge Handbook of the Gig Economy, pp. 220-233. DOI: 10.4324/9781003161875-18
  57. Però D. and Downey J. (2022). Advancing Workers Rights in the Gig Economy through Discursive Power: The Communicative Strategies of Indie Unions. Work, Employment and Society. DOI: 10.1177/09500170221103160.
  58. Petrini E. and Wettergren A. (2022). Organising outsourced workers in UK’s new trade unionism-emotions, protest, and collective identity. Social Movement Studies, 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2022.2054795.
  59. Rizzo M. and Atzeni M. (2020). Workers’ power in resisting precarity: Comparing transport workers in Buenos Aires and Dar es Salaam. Work, Employment and Society, 34(6): 1114-1130. DOI: 10.1177/9550017020928248
  60. Rhomberg C. and Lopez S. (2021). Understanding Strikes in the 21st Century, in Power and Protest, Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change, 44: 37-62.
  61. Schmalz S., Ludwig C. and Webster E. (2018). The Power Resources Approach. Global Labour Journal, 9(2): 113-114.
  62. Silver B. (2003) Forces of Labor. Cambridge: CUP.
  63. Smith H. (2022). The ‘indie unions’ and the UK labour movement: Towards a community of practice. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 43(3): 1369-1390. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X2119956
  64. Snow D. (2008). Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields. In Snow D, Soule S and Kriesi (eds) Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, London: Blackwell, pp. 380-412.
  65. Standing G. (2011). The Precariat. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.5040/9781849664554
  66. Tassinari A. and Maccarrone V. (2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1): 35-54. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019862954.
  67. UVW (2018). Wildcat Strike of Recycling Workers. United Voices of the World, 28-3-2018. -- https://www.uvwunion.org.uk/en/news/2018/03/68gsokal913a3hy4clihpiywwop87o/ last accessed 16-7-2021.
  68. Weghmann V. (2022). Theorising practice: independent trade unions in the UK. Work in the Global Economy, 2(1): 132-147. DOI: 10.1332/273241721X16510573048560
  69. Weghmann V. (2023). The tail that wags the dog: lessons from the UK’s independent unions for class struggle trade unionism. Employee Relations. DOI: 10.1108/ER-01-2022-0016
  70. Wills J., Datta K., Evans Y., Herbert J., May J. and McIlwaine C. (2010). Global Cities at Work. New Migrant Divisions of Labour. London: Pluto.
  71. Woodcock J. (2020). How to beat the boss: Game Workers Unite in Britain. Capital & Class, 44(4): 523-529. DOI: 10.1177/0309816820906349
  72. Woodcock J. (2021). The fight against platform capitalism. London: Westminster UP.
  73. Wood A., Lehdonvirta V. and Graham M. (2018). Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment 33(2): 95-112.
  74. Wright E.O. (2000). Working-class Power, Capitalist-class Interests and Class Compromise. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4): 957-1002. DOI: 10.1086/210397

Davide Però, Resisting outsourcing: learning from migrant workers’ power-building strategies in the British service sector in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 167/2023, pp 100-120, DOI: 10.3280/SL2023-167005