Co-produzione urbana e sistemi di governo del territorio in Europa

Titolo Rivista TERRITORIO
Autori/Curatori Francesca Bragaglia , Erblin Berisha, Giancarlo Cotella, Umberto Janin Rivolin
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2023/106
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 9 P. 83-91 Dimensione file 367 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2023-106011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

La co-produzione urbana, attraverso cui i cittadini contribuiscono alla piani?cazione e al governo delle città con le istituzioni pubbliche, è pratica diffusa in tutta Europa. Il modello ricorrente è quello spontaneo della ‘co-city’, mentre solo pochi paesi hanno adottato politiche nazionali di co-produzione urbana. Un confronto con i sistemi europei di governo del territorio rivela, a ben vedere, almeno tre livelli di possibile correlazione. A parte i casi spontanei di co-city, le politiche nazionali di co-produzione urbana sembrano presenti soltanto se i sistemi sono capaci di garantire una migliore capacità di controllo pubblico. Inoltre, solo i sistemi che assegnano caso per caso i diritti d’uso del suolo consentono alla coproduzione di fare parte del sistema stesso.;

Keywords:co-produzione; co-city; sistemi di governo del territorio

  1. Albrechts L., 2013, «Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a co-production perspective». Planning Theory, 12, 1: 46-63. DOI: 10.1177/1473095212452722
  2. Allmendinger P., Haughton G., 2012, «Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? ». Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 1: 89-103.
  3. Forester J., 1999, The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  4. Arampatzi A., 2022, «Social innovation and austerity governance in Athens and Madrid: Rethinking the changing contours of policy and practice». European Urban and Regional Studies, 29, 1: 45-58. DOI: 10.1177/09697764211028900
  5. Arnstein S.R., 1969, «A ladder of citizen participation». Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35: 216-224.
  6. Berisha E., Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., Solly A., 2023, «Sistemi di governo del territorio e consumo di suolo in Europa». Territorio, 102, 2022: 123-132, DOI: 10.3280/TR2022-102016OA
  7. Bollier D., Helfrich S., 2015, eds., Patterns of commoning. Commons Strategy Group and Off the Common Press.
  8. Bradley Q., 2015, «The political identities of neighbourhood planning in England». Space and Polity, 19, 2: 97-109. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2015.1046279
  9. Bragaglia F., 2021, «Social innovation as a ‘magic concept’ for policy-makers and its implications for urban governance». Planning Theory, 20, 2: 102-120. DOI: 10.1177/1473095220934832.
  10. Bragaglia F., 2022, Ruling the unruled? The institutionalisation of social innovation in urban governance. Phd Thesis, Doctorate in Urban and Regional Development, Politecnico di Torino.
  11. Bragaglia F., Caldarice O., Janin Rivolin U., 2023, «Co-production and the spatial planning systems in England and Italy». Planning Theory, 1-23. DOI: 10.1177/14730952231203516
  12. Brunetta G., 2018, «In Search of New Urban Welfare Policies: The Design of the Commons for Spatial Planning». In: Caldarice O. (ed.), Reconsidering Welfare Policies in Times of Crisis: Perspectives for European Cities. Cham: Springer, 81-84. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68622-6_1
  13. Boverket, 2014, PBL Kunskapsbanken – en handbok om planoch bygglagen. www.boverket.se/sv/PBL-kunskapsbanken/Allmant-om-PBL/lag-ratt/plan--ochbygglagsstiftningens-utveckling/ (accesso: 2024.01.30). Cabinet Office, 2010, The coalition: our programme for government. London: HMSO.
  14. Carlson D., 2017, Mapping Public Participation in Sweden. An overview of the individual’s voice in the planning process. www.diva-portal. org/smash/get/diva2:1109880/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accesso: 2024.01.30) Charnock G., March H., Ribera-Fumaz R., 2019, «From Smart to Rebel City? Worlding, Provincialising and the Barcelona Model». Urban Studies, 58, 3: 581-600. DOI: 10.1177/0042098019872119
  15. Ciaffi D., Saporito E., 2017, «Shared Administration for Smart Cities». In: Sanseverino E.R., Sanseverino R., Vaccaro V. (eds.), Smart Cities Atlas. Cham: Springer, 243-348.
  16. Clarke J.H., Newman J.E., 2009, Publics, politics and power: remaking the Public in Public Services. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd. Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., Santangelo M., 2015, «Transferring ‘good’
  17. territorial governance across Europe. Opportunities and barriers». In: Schmitt P., Van Well L (eds.), Territorial Governance Across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects. London-New York: Routledge, 238-253. De Angelis M., 2017, Omnia Sunt Communia: On the Commons and the Transformation to Postcapitalism. London: Zed Books.
  18. Dodaro M., Mozzana C., Anselmo M., 2022, «Social innovation, political activism and solidarity: insights from the pandemic crisis». Territorio, 99, 2021: 61-66. DOI: 10.3280/TR2021-099009
  19. Durose C., Perry B., Richardson L., 2022, «Is co-production a ‘good’concept? Three responses». Futures, 142, 102999: 1-11.
  20. Erixon Aalto H., Marcus L., Torsvall J., 2018, «Towards a Social-Ecological Urbanism: Co-Producing Knowledge through Design in the Albano Resilient Campus Project in Stockholm». Sustainability, 10, 3: 1-25.
  21. Foster S.R., Iaione C., 2019, «Ostrom in the city: Design principles and practices for the urban commons». In: Hudson B., Rosenbloom J., Cole
  22. D. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons. London: Routledge, 235-255. DOI: 10.4324/9781315162782-19
  23. Foster S.R., Iaione C., 2022, Co-cities: Innovative Transitions Toward Just and Self-sustaining Communities. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  24. Fredricsson C., 2016, Public–private cooperation in the early stages of the planning process. Nordregio News. https://norden.diva-portal.org/ smash/get/diva2:1128939/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accesso: 2023.12.21).
  25. Fung A., 2003, «Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional choices and their consequences». Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 3: 338-367. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9760.00181
  26. Fung A., Wright E.O., 2003, Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London-New York: Verso Press.
  27. Galuszka J., 2019, «What makes urban governance co-productive? Contradictions in the current debate on co production». Planning Theory, 18, 1: 143-160. DOI: 10.1177/1473095218780535
  28. Hess C., 2008, Mapping the new commons. Syracuse: Syracuse University Library.
  29. Healey P., 1997, Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan Press LDT. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
  30. Hossu C.A., Oliveira E., Niță A., 2022, «Streamline democratic values in planning systems: A study of participatory practices in European strategic spatial planning». Habitat International, 129: 102675, 1-14.
  31. Huron A., 2015, «Working with strangers in saturated space: Reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons». Antipode, 47, 4: 963-979.
  32. Iaione C., 2016, «The CO-City: Sharing, collaborating, cooperating, and commoning in the city». American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 75, 2: 415-455.
  33. Innes J. E., 1998, «Information in communicative planning». Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, 1: 52-63.
  34. Janin Rivolin U., 2012, «Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: A Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison». Planning Practice and Research, 27, 1: 63-85.
  35. Komatsu Cipriani T., Deserti A., Kleverbeck M., Rizzo F., Terstriep J., 2020, «Business models & social innovation: mission-driven versus profit-driven organisations». International Review of Applied Economics, 34, 5: 541-566. DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2020.1781066
  36. Labsus, edited by 2020, Rapporto 2020 sull’amministrazione condivisa dei beni comuni. www.labsus.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Rap- porto_LABSUS_2020.pdf (accesso: 2023.12.21).
  37. Lamy F., 2014, Exchange day on the reform of the Politique de la Ville and the territorial administration of the State at the Université de Paris-Ouest Nanterre. www.vie-publique.fr/discours/190807-declaration-de-m-fran- cois-lamy-ministre-de-la-ville-sur-les-grandes-l (accesso: 2023.09.21). Madelin B., Demoulin J., Bacqué M.H., 2019, 217-239.«Évaluer les conseils citoyens: Pourquoi? Comment? Pour quels résultats? ». Participations, 2:
  38. Mitlin D., 2008, «With and beyond the state co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations». Environment and Urbanization, 20, 2: 339-360. DOI: 10.1177/0956247808096117
  39. Moroni S., 2015a, «Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction: Urban codes for selforganising cities». Planning Theory 14, 3: 248-267. DOI: 10.1177/1473095214521104
  40. Moroni S., 2015b, «Beni di nessuno, beni di alcuni, beni di tutti: note critiche sull’incerto paradigma dei beni comuni». Scienze Regionali 2015, 3: 137-144. DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2015-003008
  41. Nadin V., Stead D., 2008, «European spatial planning systems, social models and learning». Disp-the planning review, 44, 172: 35-47. DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
  42. Nadin V., Stead D., Dąbrowski M., Fernandez-Maldonado A.M.,
  43. 2020, «Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe». Regional studies, 55, 5: 791-803. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363.
  44. Ostanel E., 2023, «Innovation in strategic planning: Social innovation and co-production under a common analytical framework». Planning Theory, DOI: 10.1177/14730952231182610
  45. Ostrom E., 1996, «Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development». World development, 24, 6: 1073-1087.
  46. Parker G., Lynn T., Wargent M., 2015, «Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England». Town Planning Review, 86, 5: 519-536.
  47. Parker G., Lynn T., Wargent M., 2017, «Contestation and conservatism in neighbourhood planning in England: reconciling agonism and collaboration? ». Planning Theory & Practice, 18, 3: 446-465.
  48. Parker G., Street E., 2015, «Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism, dialogic politics, and the modulation of community action». Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 4: 794-810.
  49. Parker G., Wargent M., Salter K., Yuille A., 2023. Neighbourhood planning in England: A decade of institutional learning. Progress in Planning, 174:1-26.
  50. Polyak L., Iaione C., 2022, Co4Cities – The Network Final Report. Urbact. Città di Torino: Dipartimento Fondi Europei e PNNR.
  51. Rosol M., 2012, «Community volunteering as neoliberal strategy? Green space production in Berlin». Antipode, 44, 1: 239-257.
  52. Sandercock L., 1998, ed., Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history, Vol. 2. California: University of California Press.
  53. Sicilia M., Guarini E., Sancino A., Andreani M., Ruffini R., 2016, «Public services management and co production in multi-level governance settings». International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 1: 8-27. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314566008
  54. Slaev A.D., Kovachev A., Nozharova B., Daskalova D., Nikolov P., Petrov P., 2019, «Overcoming the failures of citizen participation: The relevance of the liberal approach in planning». Planning Theory, 18, 4: 448-469. DOI: 10.1177/1473095219848472
  55. Sorrentino M., Sicilia M.F., Howlett M., 2018, «Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool». Policy and Society, 37, 3: 277-293. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676
  56. Stepanova O., Polk M., 2023, «The role of co-production in a conflictual planning process: the case of Haga station in Gothenburg, Sweden». Urban Transformations, 5, 1: 1-24.
  57. Swyngedouw E., 2005, «Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyondthe state». Urban studies, 42, 11: 1991-2006. DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279869
  58. Taylor E., Santamaria F., Sturzaker J., 2019, «Localism: a planning panacea?». Town Planning Review, 90, 5: 481-496.
  59. Wargent M., Parker G., 2018, «Re-imagining neighbourhood governance: the future of neighbourhood planning in England». Town Planning Review, 89, 4: 379-403.
  60. Watson V., 2014, «Co-production and collaboration in planning– The difference». Planning Theory and Practice, 15, 1: 62-76. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2013.866266

Francesca Bragaglia , Erblin Berisha, Giancarlo Cotella, Umberto Janin Rivolin, Co-produzione urbana e sistemi di governo del territorio in Europa in "TERRITORIO" 106/2023, pp 83-91, DOI: 10.3280/TR2023-106011