The Social Added Value of nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Two concept mapping studies

Titolo Rivista PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’
Autori/Curatori Francesco Tommasi, Carlo Pistoni, Anna Maria Meneghini, Federica de Cordova
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2024/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 15 P. 33-47 Dimensione file 206 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSC2024-001003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The paper reports the findings of a research carried out thanks to the collaboration with the local service centre for volunteerism of Veorna. The project aimed at realizing assessment tools for accounting the social value of Non-profit and Voluntary Organizations (NPVOs). Following the psycho-sociological concept of Social Added Value (SAV) broadly defined as the series of relational benefits to one community brought by NPVOs, two separate studies using the participatory mixed-method approach of the concept mapping were realized. Study 1 involved volunteers while Study 2 addressed the perspectives of non-volunteers. Thanks to the confrontation of the findings of these studies, the paper presents a co-constructed model of SAV which confirms and extends the current perspectives by adding the novel elements such as values, local presence, and community development. The paper concludes by narratively discussing the results in order to advance new vistas for research and practice.

L’articolo riporta gli esiti di una ricerca svoltosi in collaborazione con il Centro di Servizio per il Volontariato di Verona in merito alla realizzazione di strumenti per la valutazione d’impatto degli Enti del Terzo Settore e delle Organizzazioni di Volontariato (ETS-OdV). Applicando il concetto psicosociologico di Valore Sociale Aggiunto (VSA) inteso come l’insieme di beni relazionali per la comunità di ETS-OdV, sono state realizzate due indagini basate sull’approccio partecipato-mixed method del concept mapping. Lo studio 1 ha coinvolto una popolazione di volontari mentre lo studio 2 di non-volontari del territorio. I risultati hanno confermato, attraverso un processo partecipato, la concettualizzazione fin qui sviluppata di VSA, estendendola anche a dimensioni non relazionali quali valori, presenza nel territorio, sviluppo di comunità. L’articolo conclude discutendo possibili linee di ricerca e intervento.

Keywords:valore sociale aggiunto, organizzazioni di volontariato, ricerca partecipata, concept mapping.

  1. Arcidiacono, C., De Piccoli, N., Mannarini, T., & Marta, E. (2021). Psicologia di comunità vol. I. Prospettive e concetti chiave. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  3. Bassuk, S. S., Glass, T. A., & Berkman, L. F. (1999). Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(3), 165-173. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-3-199908030-0000
  4. Beard, J. R., Officer, A., de Carvalho, I. A., Sadana, R., Pot, A. M., Michel, J. P., ... & Peeters, G. M. (2016). The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. The Lancet, 387(10033), 2145-2154. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.162880
  6. Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2013). Experiences of neighbourhood exclusion and inclusion among older people living in deprived inner-city areas in Belgium and England. Ageing & Society, 33(1), 89-109. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X1200054
  7. Glass, T. A., de Leon, C. F. M., Bassuk, S. S., & Berkman, L. F. (2006). Social engagement and depressive symptoms in late life: Longitudinal findings. Journal of Aging and Health, 11(4), 509-527. DOI: 10.1177/089826430629
  8. Holt-Lunstad, J. (2018). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 437-458.
  9. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of Community-Based Research: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.
  10. Kaplan, M., Thang, L. L., Sanchez, M., & Hoffman, J. (2017). Intergenerational pathways to a sustainable society. Cham: Springer International Publishing
  11. Kelly, J. G. (2006). Becoming Ecological: An Expedition into Community Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  12. Lak, A., Rashidghalam, P., Myint, P. K., & Baradaran, H. R. (2020). Comprehensive 5P framework for active aging using the ecological approach: an iterative systematic review. BMC public health, 20, 1-22.
  13. Marzo, R. R., Khanal, P., Shrestha, S., Mohan, D., Myint, P. K., & Su, T. T. (2023). Determinants of active aging and quality of life among older adults: systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1193789.
  14. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  15. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  16. Nelson, G., & Prilleltensky, I. (2010). Community Psychology: In Pursuit of Liberation and Well-being. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Pettigrew, C., & Soldan, A. (2019). Defining cognitive reserve and implications for cognitive aging. Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 19, 1-12.
  18. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  19. Remm, S., Halcomb, E., Hatcher, D., Frost, S. A., & Peters, K. (2023). Understanding relationships between general self-efficacy and the healthy ageing of older people: An integrative review. Journal of clinical nursing, 32(9-10), 1587-1598.
  20. Ripamonti, E. (2006). Il lavoro di rete nel lavoro sociale. Roma: Carocci.
  21. Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(3), 448-460. DOI: 10.1017/S135561770281324
  22. Stern, Y. (2021). How can cognitive reserve promote cognitive and neurobehavioral health?. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 36(7), 1291-1295.
  23. Stringer, E. T. (2013). Action Research. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
  24. Thomas, P. A. (2011). Trajectories of social engagement and limitations in late life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(4), 430-443. DOI: 10.1177/002214651141192
  25. Tovel, H., Carmel, S., & Raveis, V. H. (2019). Relationships among self-perception of aging, physical functioning, and self-efficacy in late life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(2), 212-221.
  26. World Health Organization (2015). World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization.
  27. Zhu, Y. (2019). Active and positive: The connection between active aging and positive psychology. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 147-156.

Francesco Tommasi, Carlo Pistoni, Anna Maria Meneghini, Federica de Cordova, The Social Added Value of nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Two concept mapping studies in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 1/2024, pp 33-47, DOI: 10.3280/PSC2024-001003