Measuring institutional quality in hybrid jurisdictions: A theoretical framework beyond traditional legal indicators

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA PUBBLICA
Autori/Curatori Massimiliano Marletta
Pubblicazione Online First 24/09/2026 Fascicolo 2026/Online First
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 24 P. 249-272 Dimensione file 383 KB
DOI 10.3280/ep202622124
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche.

This paper develops a theoretical approach to measuring institutional quality in hybrid jurisdictions, understood as legal systems where civil-law codification and commonlaw adjudication coexist in a structurally integrated way. Standard indica-tors of institutional quality È rule of law, judicial efficiency, legal certainty, and enforcement effectiveness ‒ are conceptually tailored to legally homogeneous sys-tems and can generate systematic bias when applied to hybrid orders. Building on institutional economics and measurement theory, the paper models institutional quality as a multidimensional construct driven by inter-source coherence, stability of conflict-resolution rules, and the capacity of the legal order to sustain predicta-ble governance under legal pluralism. The framework clarifies which dimensions are invisible to traditional metrics and provides a principled architecture for hy-brid-specific measurement, enabling meaningful comparison across mixed sys-tems without econometric estimation. It also yields testable qualitative implica-tions for institutional design, reform priorities, and crossjurisdictional benchmark-ing exercises today.

Jel codes:K3

Massimiliano Marletta, Measuring institutional quality in hybrid jurisdictions: A theoretical framework beyond traditional legal indicators in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " Online First/2026, pp 249-272, DOI: 10.3280/ep202622124