La Network Governance a supporto dell’Open Innovation: un’analisi della letteratura

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Palmira Piedepalumbo, Concetta Metallo, Daniela Mancini
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 16 P. 79-94 Dimensione file 242 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2017-003006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This study aims at investigate the state of the art of network governance studies in relation to a specific context, that is research and development (R & D) and open innovation. The research was conducted through a literature review over the period 2007-2017. The obtained results outline a descriptive picture of the main trends in the field of governance in open innovation networks, highlighting the concentration of studies in some research centers and journals, and therefore a need for research that deepens the Governance as a key factor in open innovation processes.

Parole chiave:Network governance, open innovation, literature review.

  1. Angiola N., Bianchi P. (2016), The performance appraisal of public/private networks. The case of home care integrated services for the elderly, Management Control, 1, pp. 59-70. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-001004
  2. Aureli S., Del Baldo M. (2016), Performance Appraisal of Business Networks. How Small and Medium Enterprises Define and Monitor Network Objectives, Management Control, 1, pp. 35-58. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-001003
  3. Baka V. (2016), Co-creating an open platform at the local governance level: How openness is enacted in Zambia, Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), pp. 140-152.
  4. Brondoni S.M. & Gnecchi F. (2011), La comunicazione di corporate governance. Sinergie, Italian Journal of Management, (73-74), pp. 169-190.
  5. Burt R.S. (1992), Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Harvard University Press.
  6. Caputo F., Livieri B., Venturelli A. (2014), Intangibles and Value Creation in Network Agreement: analysis of Italian firms, Management Control, 2, pp. 23-43. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2014-002003
  7. Cardoni A. (2012), Business planning and management accounting in strategic networks: theoretical development and empirical evidence from enterprises’ network “agreement”, Management Control, 3, pp. 91-116. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2013-SU3005
  8. Chesbrough H.W. (2003a), Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  9. Chesbrough H. (2003b), The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property, California Management Review, 45(3), pp. 33-58.
  10. Chesbrough H.W. (2006), Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  11. Clauss T., Spieth P. (2015), Governance of open innovation networks with national vs international scope, Journal of Strategy and Management, 10(1), pp. 66-85. DOI: 10.1108/JSMA-07-2015-0057
  12. Dahlander L. & Gann D.M. (2010), How open is innovation?, Research policy, 39(6), pp. 699-709.
  13. Fama E.F. & Jensen M.C. (1983), Separation of ownership and control, Journal of law and economics, pp. 301-325.
  14. Felin T. & Zenger T.R. (2014), Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice, Research Policy, 43(5), p. 914-925.
  15. Galeotti M., Garzella S., Fiorentino R., Della Corte G. (2016), The Strategic Intelligence implications for Information Systems, Management Control, 1, pp. 105-123. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-001007
  16. Hart O. (1995), Corporate governance: some theory and implications, The Economic Journal, pp. 678-689. DOI: 10.2307/2235027
  17. Jeppesen L.B., Frederiksen L. (2006), Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments, Organization science, 17(1), 45-63.
  18. Mancini D. (2010), Il sistema informativo e di controllo relazionale per il governo della rete di relazioni collaborative d'azienda, Milano, Giuffrè.
  19. Mancini D. (2011), L’azienda-rete e le decisioni di partnership: il ruolo del Sistema informative relazionale, Management Control, 1, pp. 65-97. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2011-001004
  20. Mancini D. (2016), Accounting Information Systems in an Open Society. Emerging Trends and Issues, Management Control, 1, pp. 5-16. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-00100
  21. Mayntz R. (1999), La teoria della “governance”: sfide e prospettive, Rivista italiana di scienza politica, 29(1), pp. 3-22. DOI: 10.1426/1638
  22. Mizruchi M.S. (1983), Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and boards of directors in large American corporations, Academy of Management Review, 8(3), pp. 426-435. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1983.4284426
  23. Metallo C., Agrifoglio R., Spagnoletti P. (2012), Design Science in Information Systems Research: foundational and evolutionary aspects, Centro di Ricerca sui sistemi informative.
  24. Moreno J.L. (1934), Who shall survive?: A new approach to the problem of human interrelations, Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co.
  25. Powell W. (2003), Neither market nor hierarchy, The sociology of organizations: classic, contemporary, and critical readings, 315, pp. 104-117.
  26. Provan K.G., Kenis P. (2008), Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness, Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), pp. 229-252.
  27. Provan K.G., Fish A., Sydow J. (2007), Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks, Journal of management, 33(3), pp. 479-516.
  28. Rizza C., Ruggeri D. (2016), The performativity of Accounting Information System in interfirm relationships, Management Control, 1, pp. 71-89 DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-001005
  29. Saebi T. & Foss N.J. (2015), Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions, European Management Journal, 33(3), pp. 201-213.
  30. Santini F. (2013), Strategic Management Accounting and financial performance in the small and medium sized Italian manufacturing enterprises, Management Control, 1, pp. 77-107. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2013-001005
  31. Verbeek A., Debackere K., Luwel M., Zimmermann E. (2002), Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology–I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators, International Journal of management reviews, 4(2), pp. 179-211.
  32. Von Hippel E. (2005), Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation, Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55(1), pp. 63-78. DOI: 10.1260/175722209787951224
  33. West J., Salter A. Vanhaverbeke W. & Chesbrough H. (2014), Open innovation: The next decade, Research Policy, 43 (5), pp. 805-811.
  34. Westphal J.D. & Zajac E.J. (1995), Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection, Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 60-83.

Palmira Piedepalumbo, Concetta Metallo, Daniela Mancini, La Network Governance a supporto dell’Open Innovation: un’analisi della letteratura in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 3/2017, pp 79-94, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2017-003006