Social Network Analysis for construction and evaluation mechanisms of social capital. The role of Local Action Groups (LAG)

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Author/s Antonello Podda
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/143 Language Italian
Pages 20 P. 127-146 File size 256 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2016-143008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article has two objectives. From the theoretical point of view to think of a tool to analyze the effects of the creation of Social Capital and the creation of networks mechanisms between economic operators. From a Europe Union policies (Leader approach, Axis 4 of the Rural Development Programme), accountability point of view, the main question concerns the analysis of the activity of Local Action Groups (LAG): action to stimulate participatory processes qualitatively and quantitatively adequate compared to the complex of the adopted policy. We use the Burt definition of social capital - social capital as a location on the network -, we use the Coleman’s boat analytical framework. The methodology used is the Social Network Analysis (SNA) both in the two-mode network approach, that connects actors and events in which they participate, and in onemode network approach, that allows us to evaluate the brokerage activities of the individual actor in network of LAG.

Keywords: Local development, local action group (LAG), Rural Development Programme (RDP), Leader Approach - Axis 4, social capital, social network analysis

  1. Magnani N., Stuffi L. (2009). Translation sociology and social capital in rural development initiatives. A case study from the Italian Alps. Journal of Rural Studies, 25: 231-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.10.004
  2. Martini A., Sisti M. (2009). Valutare il successo delle politiche pubbliche. Bologna: Il Mulino. DOI: 10.1444/3121
  3. Melece L. (2013). Agricultural Cooperatives for Social Capital Development in Latvia. Organizacijų Vadyba: Sisteminiai Tyrimai, 66: 53-67. DOI: 10.7220/mOSR.1392.1142.2013.66.4
  4. Mosora L.C., Mosora M.H. (2012). The Importance of Local Action Groups in the Romanian European Integration Process: an Empirical Study. Informatica Economică, 16: 44-48. Testo disponibile al sito: www.revistaie.ase.ro/content/64/05%20-%20Mosora,%20Mosora.pdf (22/03/2016).
  5. Mutti A. (1998). Capitale sociale e sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  6. Osti G. (2010). Sociologia del Territorio. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  7. Papadopoulou E. (2010). Applying Shift – Share Analysis (SSA) on LEADER +Initiative Local Action Groups in Greece. FP 7 Project no. 213034 Funded by the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technology Development of the European Commission. Testo disponibile al sito: www.rudi-europe.net/uploads/media/Case-study_Greece_2_01.pdf (22/03/2016).
  8. Pisani E., Franceschetti G. (2011). Evaluation of social capital promotion in rural development programmes: a methodological approach. In: Evidence-Based Agricultural and Rural Policy Making: Methodological and Empirical Challenges of Policy Evaluation. February 17-18: Ancona. Testo disponibile al sito: http://purl.umn.edu/99582 (22/03/2016).
  9. Podda A. (2010). La riforma degli enti per l’agricoltura: i risultati della network analysis. In: Casula C., a cura di, Innovazione e governo regionale. Attori e istituzioni nei processi di policy-making. Torino: Bruno Mondadori. Porru E. (2013). Valutare l’Approccio Leader: dinamiche partecipative e ruolo dell’assistenza tecnica nella fase di costituzione dei nuovi GAL sardi per il periodo di programmazione 2007-2013. I fattori immateriali dello sviluppo. In: Bottazzi G., a cura di, I fattori immateriali dello sviluppo. Cagliari: Cuec.
  10. Portes A. (1998). Social Capital: Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1-24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
  11. Putnam R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. New York: Princeton University Press.
  12. Putnam R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  13. Ray C. (2000). Endogenous socio-economic development in the European Union - issues of evaluation. Journal of Rural Studies, 16: 447-458. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00012-7
  14. Secco L., Da Re R., Pettenella D., Cesaro L. (2010). La qualita della governance in ambito rurale: quali indicatori e quali strumenti per misurarla? XLVII Convegno di Studi SIDEA, L’agricoltura oltre la crisi, 22-25 settembre 2010: Campobasso. Testo consultabile al sito: http://ilo.unimol.it/sidea/images/ upload/convegno_2010/paper/secco%20da%20re%20pettenella%20cesaro.pdf (22/03/2016).
  15. Shortall S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: Exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies, 24: 450-457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001
  16. Švihlova D., Kubišova L., (2014). Role of Local Government in Supporting Local Social Capital. XVII. mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách Hustopeče, 6: 18-20. DOI: 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-6840-2014-35
  17. Teilmann K. (2012). Measuring social capital accumulation in rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 28: 458-465. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.10.002
  18. Teilmann K.A., Thuesen A.A. (2014). Important Types of LAG-Municipality Interaction When Collaborating on Rural Development: Lessons from Danish LEADER LAGs. International Journal of Rural Management, 10: 21-45. DOI: 10.1177/0973005214526501
  19. Trigilia C. (2005). Sviluppo locale. Un progetto per l’Italia. Roma: Laterza.
  20. Trobia A., Milia V. (2011). Social network analysis. Roma: Carocci.
  21. Van Der Gaag M., Snijders T. (2005). The Resource Generator: social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks, 27: 1-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.10.001
  22. Viesti G. (2006). Il difficile policy making europeo: la discussione sulla politica regionale e sul bilancio dell’Unione (2001-05). Studi sull’integrazione europea, 1: 45-59.
  23. Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815478
  24. Wiesinger G. (2007). The importance of social capital in rural development, networking and decision-making in rural areas. Revue de Géographie Alpine |Journal of Alpine Research, 95: 43-56. DOI: 10.4000/rga.354.ZajdaK.,ŁodzkiU.(2013).CooperationBetweenLocalActionGroups.ComparisonofNetworksCreatedbyOrganisationsfromTheLubuskieandMałopolskieVoivodeships.JournalofAgribusinessandRuralDevelopment,1:233-247.Testodisponibilealsito:http://dspace.uni.lodz.pl:8080/xmlui/handle/11089/5789(22/03/2016)
  25. Zajda K. (2014). Problems of functioning of Polish local action groups from the perspective of the social capital concept. Eastern European Countryside, 20: 73-97. DOI: 10.2478/eec-2014-0004
  26. Lopolito A., Nardone G., Sisto R. (2011). Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Local Action Groups in LEADER Programmes. New Medit, 1: 43-49.
  27. Lopolito A., Giannocaro G., Prosperi M. (2011). Efficiency of LEADER Programmes in the creation of tangible and intangible outputs: a Data Envelopment Analysis application to Local Action Groups performances. In: Evidence-Based Agricultural and Rural Policy Making: Methodological and Empirical Challenges of Policy Evaluation. February 17-18: Ancona. Testo consultabile al sito: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/99429 (22/03/2016).
  28. Lin N. (2003). Capitale sociale: paradigmi concorrenti e la loro validazione concettuale ed empirica. Inchiesta, 139: 5-17.
  29. Lin N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Hanneman R.A., Riddle M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California. Testo disponibile al sito: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/index.html (22/03/2016).
  31. Fukuyama F. (1995). Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0030-4387(96)90073-3
  32. Fernandez R.M., Gould R.V. (1994). A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. American Journal of Sociology, 99: 1455-1491. DOI: 10.1086/230451.FranceschettiG.,PisaniE.,DiNapoliR.(2015).Capitalesocialeesviluppolocale.DallateoriaallavalutazioneempiricainareeruraliinItalia.Roma:INEA-CREACollanaStudieRicerche
  33. Di Napoli R. (2015). Leader uno strumento di sviluppo per le aree rurali. RRN Magazine, 8: 6-11. Testo disponibile al sito: www.pianetapsr.it/magazine(22/03/2016).
  34. de Blasio G., Nuzzo G. (2011). Quanta parte dei divari Nord-Sud sono attribuibili al capitale sociale. Esercizi con econometria e la storia. In: de Blasio G., Sestito P., a cura di, Il capitale sociale. Roma: Donzelli.
  35. Cristini L., Licciardo F., Mappa O. (2012). L’analisi delle reti sociali nella valutazione dei Psr. Un’applicazione della Social network analysis per lo studio delle reti create dai GAL nel Psr Liguria. Agriregionieuropa, 1: 1-9. Testo disponibile al sito: http://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/31/lanalisi-delle-reti-sociali-nella-valutazione-dei-psr.
  36. Corte dei Conti Europea (2010). Relazione Speciale n. 5/2010 della Corte dei Conti europea. Testo disponibile al sito: www.eca.europa.eu (22/03/2016).
  37. Coleman S.J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge-London: The Belknap Press.
  38. Chmieliński P. (2011). On Community Involvement in Rural Development – A Case of Leader Programme in Poland. Economics & Sociology, 4: 120-128.
  39. Casieri A., Nazzaro C., Roselli L. (2010). Trust building and social capital as development policy tools in rural areas. An empirical analysis: the case of the LAG CDNISAT. New Medit, 9: 24-30.
  40. Cartocci R. (2007). Mappe del tesoro: atlante del capitale sociale in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino. DOI: 10.2383/25963
  41. Burt R.S. (2005). Brockerage and Closure, And introduction to Social Capital. London: Oxford University Press.
  42. Burt R.S. (2001). Structural Holes Versus Network Closure as Social Capital. In: Lin N., Cook K., Burt R.S., a cura di, Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  43. Burt R.S. (2000). The Network Structure of Social Capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 345-423. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
  44. Burroni L., Piselli F., Ramella F., Trigilia C., a cura di (2009). Città metropolitane e politiche urbane. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  45. Bottazzi G., a cura di (2005). Dal basso o dall’alto? Riflessioni su sviluppo locale e programmazione negoziata in Sardegna. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  46. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
  47. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G, Johnson J.C. (2013). Analysing Social Network. London: Sage.
  48. Barbera F. (2004). Meccanismi Sociali. Bologna: Il Mulino. DOI: 10.978.8815/141620
  49. Bagnasco A. (2002). Il capitale sociale nel capitalismo che cambia. Stato e Mercato, 2: 271-304. DOI: 10.1425/1176

  • La social network analysis come strumento di valutazione delle politiche di sviluppo locale: un'applicazione nell'ambito di LEADER 2014-2022 Stefano Ghinoi, Giovanni Carrosio, Stefano Carta, in RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 87/2024 pp.32
    DOI: 10.3280/RIV2023-087003
  • Diagnosis of Rural Development Processes Based on the Stock of Social Capital and Social Networks: Approach from E-I Index J. Serrano, Javier Esparcia, in Land /2023 pp.850
    DOI: 10.3390/land12040850

Antonello Podda, Meccanismi di costruzione e valutazione del capitale sociale attraverso la Social Network Analysis. Il ruolo dei Gruppi di Azione Locale (GAL) in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 143/2016, pp 127-146, DOI: 10.3280/SL2016-143008