Alberto Silvani

Un nuovo scenario per la valutazione della ricerca universitaria


Fascicolo: 100 / 2013

The growing attention on research evaluation in universities has underlined the importance of having a data system of information able to both sustain the decision-making process, and allow its use for different and not always converging purposes. Promoting excellence does not always coincide with the need to guarantee high quality and availability in an increasingly competitive environment. The «system dimension» is not considered for what it actually signifies, both at an internal and external level of the university. The article underlines the «internal evaluation», the procedures and choices that are maturing in the Italian context, starting with the recognition of the phenomenon promoted by Crui, and taking into consideration three very different examples. These examples differ in organizational aspects, and are considered based on their development and their motivational drive. The conclusions underline how the scenario is constantly evolving and needs to take note of the changing forms and ways of communication. This includes a process that leads to the realization of the scientific results to disseminate. The hope is to avoid the risk of confining evaluation activity in a contradictory and partial environment, and open it to the progression of knowledge.

Alberto Silvani, Filippo Bonella, Lucia Cella, Alessandro Rotilio

Nuovi mercati della valutazione: misurare l’impatto di uno sforzo addizionale territoriale in ricerca e innovazione

RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione

Fascicolo: 42 / 2008

Nuovi mercati della valutazione: misurare l’impatto di uno sforzo addizionale territoriale in ricerca e innovazione - Research and innovation policies have been increasingly ascribed to regions as a consequence of devolving power and resources from the national level to the local level. Local administrators have been empowered with new and challenging responsibilities but often lack the necessary instruments and knowledge to adequately evaluate the undertaken initiatives and to operate consistently with the European and national dimensions. In this respect impact assessment brings in a new metrics that is neither exclusively related to the scientific and/or economic value of the innovation results nor to a support function to other policies. Experts and/or ad hoc organisations are often appointed by local administrations with the task of describing the dimensions of such impact - qualifying (and quantifying) its descriptive parameters and identifying interested parties. So far this approach has not produced robust results as for the causality links generated, the additionality issue and the role of the local dimension, while the available tool-box is quite poor. This paper is intended to illustrate the results of a pilot experience carried out in the last few years in Trentino. The analysis takes into account the relations among policy makers, available tools, resources, and the role of the public administration and of professional evaluators. Conceptual and interpretative approaches and tools need further development, but the mayor weakness seems to come from the relationship between customer and evaluators. A new market based on new rules, professional roles and shared behaviours is needed in order to address a correct evaluation pathway and to analyse policies and activities within a common frame.

Key words: impact analysis, regional development, research and innovation policy, policy Evaluation

Parole chiave: analisi d’impatto, sviluppo regionale, politica della ricerca e dell’innovazione, valutazione delle politiche

Alberto Silvani


RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione

Fascicolo: 34 / 2006

Fti-Forum per la Tecnologia dell'Informazione, Stefano Ciccone


Innovazione, qualità e sviluppo per Roma

cod. 571.4.4