Click here to download

The evaluation of the scientific research in Italy. Preliminary reflections and suggestions
Author/s: Gianfranco Rusconi 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  13 Pg. 73-85 FullText PDF:  74 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MACO2014-001005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Since the acquisition of a scientific status on the part of all specific disciplines, and all along their evolution, the topic of how to formulate a clear definition of scientific "production" and "productivity" has not only been a "technical" issue, given also the socio-cultural influences of the time. This is even more difficult in the humanities and socio- economic sciences. Moreover, the role and use of scientific journals are to be considered, currently representing in many areas of research the main vehicle for the transmission of results. In business disciplines, this function has become such only recently and, if considered in absolute terms, it is likely to harm a healthy and pluralistic development of research in socio-economic sciences, even as for presentation methodologies. On the basis of these elements, the paper aims firstly at discussing what happened in the first experience of mass evaluation of the research through the VQR (for structures) and the ANVUR parameters for individual scientific qualification, then at formulating possible solutions to overcome some serious issues that emerged in the process.
Keywords: Research evaluation, Scientific production, Role of scientific journals

  1. Dalli D. (2012), La valutazione della ricerca nelle scienze aziendali: aspettative e istanze individuali, professionali e istituzionali, Sinergie rivista di studi e ricerche, 86.
  2. Freeman E. (2005), The Development of Stakeholder Theory: an idiosyncratic approach, in Smith K. and Hitt M. (eds.), Great Mind in Management: The Process of Theory Development, USA, Oxford University Press, p. 433.
  3. Genua A., Martin B. (2003), University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison. Minerva, 41, pp. 277-304., DOI: 10.1023/
  4. Kuhn T. (1969), La Struttura delle Rivoluzioni Scientifiche, Prima Edizione Italiana, Torino, Einaudi.
  5. Marchi L., Marasca S., Giuliani M. (2013), Valutare la ricerca nella prospettiva europea e internazionale: prime riflessioni, Management Control, 3, pp. 77-98.
  6. Palumbo R. (Ed.). (2011), La valutazione periodica della ricerca nelle discipline economico-aziendali. Una comparazione internazionale, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  7. Paolini A., Quagli A. (2013), Una riflessione sugli strumenti bibliometrici per la valutazione della ricerca e una proposta: il real impact factor, Management Control, 3, pp. 99-115.
  8. Rebora G., Turri M. (2010), Lo sviluppo dei sistemi di valutazione della ricerca: un’analisi critica dell’esperienza italiana, in Atti del 33° convegno dell'accademia italiana di economia aziendale, Milano, Università Bocconi.

Gianfranco Rusconi, The evaluation of the scientific research in Italy. Preliminary reflections and suggestions in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 1/2014, pp. 73-85, DOI:10.3280/MACO2014-001005


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content