Conversion factors and promotion of agency for young graduates. The employers’ perspective and some suggestions for policies

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Author/s Gabriele Blasutig
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/141 Language Italian
Pages 16 P. 193-208 File size 123 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2016-141012
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper addresses the issue of the transitions of graduates in the labor market. By taking the perspective of the capability approach, it aims at reflecting on the conditions that influence the graduates’ agency. To this end, the paper focuses the employers’ point of view, as they control, during the matching process, a set of conversion factors that determine the actual capability strength of a degree. On the base of in-depth interviews, the study addresses the employers’ representations, beliefs, attitudes and behaviors. What emerges is a picture characterized by patterns of employment and recruitment systems which are highly differentiated, interpreted in the light of organizational variables. On this basis, we suggest some policy guidelines to guarantee best conditions for the transitions of graduates into the labor market.

Keywords: School to work transitions, graduates employability, employers’ perspective, capability approach

  1. Appadurai A. (2004). The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition. In: Rao V., Walton M. a cura di, Culture and Public Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  2. Argentin G., Ballarino G. (2014), I rendimenti dell’istruzione: vantaggi nello spazio e nel tempo. In: Barbieri P., Fullin G., a cura di, Lavoro, istituzioni, diseguaglianze. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Argentin G., Triventi M. (2011). Social inequality in higher education and labour market in a period of institutional reforms: Italy, 1992-2007. Higher Education, 3: 309-323.
  4. Armano E. (2010). Precarietà e innovazione nel postfordismo. Una ricerca qualitativa sui lavoratori della conoscenza a Torino. Bologna: Emil di Odoya.
  5. Baker D.P. (2014), Schooled Society: The Educational Transformation of Global Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  6. Ballarino G., Bratti M. (2009). Field of Study and University Graduates’ Early Employment Outcomes in Italy during 1995-2004. Labour, 3: 421-457.
  7. Barone C. (2010). La segregazione di genere all’universita: il caso italiano in una prospettiva comparativa e diacronica. Stato e mercato, 89: 287-320.
  8. Behrends T. (2007). Recruitment Practices in Small and Medium Size Enterprises. An Empirical Study among Knowledge-intensive Professional Service Firms. Management revue, 1: 55-74.
  9. Behrenz L. (2001). Who gets the job and why? An explorative study of employers’ recruitment behavior. Journal of Applied Economics, 2: 255-278.
  10. Bernardi F. (2007). Transition from School to Work. In: Ritzer G., a cura di, Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Chicester: Blackwell Publishing. Bifulco L., Mozzana C. (2011). La dimensione sociale delle capacita: fattori di conversione, istituzioni e azione pubblica. Rassegna italiana di sociologia, 3: 399-415.
  11. Bills D.B. (2003). Credentials, Signals, and Screens: Explaining the Relationship Between Schooling and Job Assignment. Review of Educational Research, 4: 441-449.
  12. Blasutig G. (2008), Dalla laurea al lavoro. Le rotte e gli approdi. In: Colasanto M., Zucchetti E., a cura di, Mobilità e transizioni nei mercati del lavoro locali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Blasutig G. (2012). La condizione occupazionale dei laureati e le nuove sfide per le politiche del lavoro. Trieste: Eut.
  14. Borghans L., de Grip A., a cura di (2000). The Overeducated Worker? The Economics of Skill Utilization. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.
  15. Capsada-Munsech Q. (2014). The role of social origin and field of study on graduates’ overeducation: the case of Italy. Higher Education, 2: 1-29.
  16. Cai Y. (2013). Graduate employability: a conceptual framework for understanding employers’ perceptions. Higher Education, 4: 457-469.
  17. Colombo S. (2006). I criteri di selezione del personale. L’ingresso nel mercato del lavoro gestito dai professionisti della selezione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  18. De Weert E. (2007). Graduate Employment in Europe: The Employers’ Perspective. In: Teichler U., a cura di, Careers of University Graduates. Springer.
  19. Elias P., Purcell K. (2004). Is Mass Higher Education Working? Evidence from the Labour Market Experiences of Recent Graduates. National Institute Economic Review, 1: 60-74.
  20. Franchi M. (2005). Mobili alla meta. I giovani tra università e lavoro. Roma: Donzelli.
  21. Grandori A. (1999). Organizzazione e comportamento economico. Bologna: il Mulino.
  22. Hernandez-March J., del Peso M.M., Leguey S. (2009). Graduates’ Skills and Higher Education: The Employers’ Perspective. Tertiary Education and Management, 1: 1-16.
  23. Krueger D., Kumar K.B. (2004). Skill-specific rather than General Education: A Reason for US-Europe Growth Differences? Journal of Economic Growth, 2: 167-207.
  24. La Mendola S. (1995). Con gli occhi di Caronte. Le imprese e i neolaureati. Bologna: Clueb.
  25. Leoni R., a cura di (2008). Economia dell’innovazione. Disegni organizzativi, pratiche organizzative e performance d’impresa. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  26. Miller S.R., Rosenbaum J.E. (1997). Hiring in a Hobbesian World: Social Infrastructure and Employers’ Use of Information. Work and Occupations, 4: 498-523.
  27. Muller W., Gangl M., a cura di (2003), Transitions from Education to Work in Europe. The Integration of Youth into EU Labour Market. New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Nussbaum M. (2003). Capacità personale e democrazia sociale. Reggio Emilia: Diabasis. Quaratino L., Ghezzi G. (2002). Dalla parte delle imprese: i fabbisogni di professionalita delle aziende. In: Boldizzoni D., a cura di, Dopo la laurea. Milano: Il Sole 24 Ore.
  29. Reyneri E., Pintardi F. (2013). Dieci domande su un mercato del lavoro in crisi. Bologna: il Mulino.
  30. Rostan M. (2006). Laureati italiani ed europei a confronto. Istruzione superiore e lavoro alle soglie di un periodo di riforme. Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie.
  31. Saar E., Unt M., Helemae J., Oras K., Taht K. (2014). What is the role of education in the recruitment process? Employers’ practices and experiences of graduates from tertiary educational institutions in Estonia. Journal of Education and Work, 5: 475-495.
  32. Sala G. (2011). Approaches to Skills Mismatch in the Labour Market: A Literature Review. Politica y sociedad, 2: 1025-1045.
  33. Salvetti F., La Rosa M., Bertagni B., a cura di (2015), Employability. Knowledge, Skills and Abilities for the “Glocal” World. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  34. Sen A. (1994). La disuguaglianza. Bologna: il Mulino.
  35. Terraneo M. (2010). Istruzione e lavoro: la condizione dei neolaureati italiani. Stato e mercato, 90: 425-470.
  36. Useem M. (1989). Liberal Education and the Corporation: The Hiring and Advancement of College Graduates. New York: Aldine de Gruyte.
  37. Wolbers M.H.J. (2007), Patterns of Labour Market Entry: A Comparative Perspective on School-to-Work Transitions in 11 European Countries. Acta Sociologica, 3: 189-210.
  38. Zimmermann B. (2006). Pragmatism and the Capability Approach: Challenges in Social Theory and Empirical Research. European Journal of Social Theory, 9: 467-484

Gabriele Blasutig, Fattori di conversione e promozione dell’agency per i giovani laureati. La prospettiva dei datori di lavoro e le indicazioni per le politiche in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 141/2016, pp 193-208, DOI: 10.3280/SL2016-141012