A medium term evaluation of the Ecopass road pricing scheme in Milan: economic, environmental and transport impacts

The paper provides an evaluation of the Ecopass road pricing scheme for the years 2008, 2009 and 2010. The term Ecopass conveys the stated political objective of the scheme: a PASS to improve the quality of the urban environment (ECO). The scheme has actually improved the air quality in Milan, although the recommended PM10 threshold is still exceeded for a larger number of days than that recommended by EU directives. This paper estimates the costs and benefits of the scheme three years after its implementation using the same methodology applied in Rotaris et al. (2010) for the year 2008. The results indicate that the benefits still exceed the costs, and by an increasing amount, but at an annual decreasing rate of improvement. The Ecopass scheme has proved beneficial, but it seems to have exhausted its potential: little further gains in air quality could be obtained via a fiscal incentive to improve the abatement technology of the vehicles. The new administration, elected in June 2011, was faced with the task of deciding whether to dismiss, maintain or change the Ecopass scheme. The prevailing idea coming from the Ecopass Commission and from the advocacy groups was to extend both the area of application and the number of classes subject to the charge. In November 2011 the new administration decided to substitute Ecopass with Area C, a policy based on a congestion charge which incorporates some environmental elements.

Keywords: Road pricing, Urban transport, Congestion charge

Jel codes: H23, Q52, R48

• Efficient transport pricing–why, what, and when? Jonas Eliasson, in Communications in Transportation Research 100006/2021 pp.100006
  DOI: 10.1016/j.commtr.2021.100006
• Congestion pricing and active transport – evidence from five opportunities for natural experiment. Vicki Brown, Marj Moodie, Rob Carter, in Journal of Transport & Health /2015 pp.568
  DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2015.08.002
• Addressing transportation and environmental externalities with economics: Are policy makers listening? Robin Lindsey, Georgina Santos, in Research in Transportation Economics 100872/2020 pp.100872
  DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100872
• Is congestion pricing fair? Consumer and citizen perspectives on equity effects Jonas Eliasson, in Transport Policy /2016 pp.1
  DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.06.009
• Crossing the bridge: The effects of time-varying tolls on curbing congestion Kate Foreman, in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice /2016 pp.76
  DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.033
• The Gothenburg congestion charges: cost–benefit analysis and distribution effects Jens West, Maria Börjesson, in Transportation /2020 pp.145
  DOI: 10.1007/s11116-017-9853-4
• The impact of road pricing on accidents: a note on Milan Marco Percoco, in Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences /2016 pp.343
  DOI: 10.1007/s12076-015-0163-1
• Urban carbon governance and the transition toward low-carbon urbanism: review of a global phenomenon Kevin Lo, in Carbon Management /2014 pp.269
  DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2014.981384

Romeo Danielis, Lucia Rotaris, Edoardo Marcucci, Jérome Massiani, A medium term evaluation of the Ecopass road pricing scheme in Milan: economic, environmental and transport impacts in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2012, pp 49-83, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2012-002004