Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology

<em>Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology</em> - How should we understand why firms exist? A prevailing view has been that they serve to keep in check the transaction costs arising from the self-interested motivations of individuals. We develop in this article the argument that whal firms do better than markets is the sharing and transfer of the knowledge of individtials and groups within an organization. This knowledge consists of information (e.g., who knows what) and of know-how (e.g., how to organize a research team). What is central to our argument is that knowledge is held by individuals, but is also expressed in regularities by which members cooperate in a social community (i.e.. group, organization, or network). If knowledge is only held at Ihe individual level, then firms could change simply by employee turnover. Because we know that hiring new workers is not equivalent to changing the skills of a firm, an analysis of what firms can do must understand knowledge as embedded in the organizing principles by which people cooperate within organizations. Based on this discussion, a paradox is identified: efforts by a firm to grow by the replication of its technology enhances the potential for imitation. By considering how firms can deter imitation by innovation, we develop a more dynamic view of how firms create new knowledge. We build up this dynamic perspective by suggesting that firms learn new skills by recombining their curreni capabilities. Because new ways of cooperating cannot be easily acquired, growth occurs by building on the social relationships that currently exist in a firm. What a firm has done before tends to predict what it can do in the future. In this sense, the cumulative knowledge of the firm provides options to expand in new but uncertain markets in the future. We discuss at length the example of the make/buy decision and propose several testable hypotheses regarding the boundaries of the firm, without appealing to the notion of opportunism.

• The Bottom-of-the-Pyramid (BOP) Market: Why and How Does Serving the Impoverished Segment Promote Radical Innovation? Linqian Zhang, Yongchuan Bao, Zelong Wei, in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management /2024 pp.4455
  DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3216779
• Management Respond to Negative Feedback: AI-Powered Insights for Effective Engagement Aytac Gokce, Mina Tajvidi, Nick Hajli, in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management /2024 pp.13983
  DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3432457
• Collaborative Innovation in a Military Organization: The Importance of Transactive Memory, Knowledge Sharing, and Learning From Failure Mysha A. S. van Lamoen, Myriam Cloodt, Alex A. Alblas, in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management /2024 pp.11965
  DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2023.3269851
• The Incupportive Model for Technological Spin-Offs: Insights From Three Research Centers in France Laurent Scaringella, Jie Xiong, Shubho Chakraborty, Shuyi Hao, in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management /2024 pp.4835
  DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3208964
• R&D Partner's Network Position and Focal Firm's Innovation Performance: A Knowledge Spill-In Perspective Jinyu Yang, Qingqing Bi, in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management /2024 pp.5982
  DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3358802
• 2024 Electronics Goes Green 2024+ (EGG) Sarah-Jane Baur, Marina Proske, Ronja Scholz, Gerrit Boysen, Nils Nissen, pp.1 (DOI:10.23919/EGG62010.2024.10631197)

Bruce Kogut, Udo Zander, Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 2/2008, pp , DOI: 10.3280/SO2008-002005