Il buono, il brutto e il cattivo. Disambiguare il naturalismo di Quine
Journal title RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Author/s Susan Haack
Publishing Year 2009 Issue 2009/1
Language Italian Pages 23 P. 75-97 File size 610 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2009-001006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
Il buono, il brutto e il cattivo. Disambiguare il naturalismo di Quine - Quine’s ‘epistemology naturalised’ has been profoundly influential, but it is also highly ambiguous. Quine seems at times to claim only that epistemology is not a purely a priori enterprise but an empirical study, continuous with the sciences of cognition; at others, that epistemological questions can be turned over to the sciences to resolve; and on other occasions, that epistemological questions are misconceived and should be replaced by scientific investigation into cognition. What is argued here is that the first and most modest version of Quine’s epistemological naturalism is potentially fruitful, the second and more ambitious indefensible, and the third and most ambitious not only false but disastrous.
Susan Haack, Il buono, il brutto e il cattivo. Disambiguare il naturalismo di Quine in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 1/2009, pp 75-97, DOI: 10.3280/SF2009-001006