Why we cannot consider ourselves darwinist anymore (Why Dunant won over Darwin)
Journal title SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Author/s Costantino Cipolla
Publishing Year 2010 Issue 2010/3 Language Italian
Pages 5 P. 138-142 File size 262 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2010-003009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The new developments in medicine pose serious questions on the assumptions of Darwinistic views. Considering the sixty or more operative specialities (and the sub-specialities), the new borders of medicine, at least in the rich Western countries, may be summarized in three main branches: genetic-based medicine, or predictive medicine; regenerative medicine of organs, for an organic life without physical death, even with the death of self-consciousness; adaptive medicine, based on the adaptation to the self-conscious aims of a person, or enhancement medicine. These three kinds of applied science, in different and peculiar ways, put the free game of the natural Darwinistic evolution in crisis turning it on itself.
Keywords: Darwin, genetics, predictive-medicine, regenerative medicine, adaptive medicine, sociology of health
- Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike Bjørn Hofmann, in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy /2016 pp.253
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-016-9693-6
Costantino Cipolla, Perché non possiamo più dirci darwinisti (Perché Dunant ha avuto la meglio su Darwin) in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 3/2010, pp 138-142, DOI: 10.3280/SES2010-003009