Journal title CADMO
Author/s Fabienne M. van der Kleij, Caroline F. Timmers, Theo J.H.M. Eggen
Publishing Year 2011 Issue 2011/1
Language English Pages 18 P. 21-38 File size 413 KB
DOI 10.3280/CAD2011-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
This study reviews literature regarding the effectiveness of different methods for providing written feedback through a computer-based assessment for learning. In analysing the results, a distinction is made between lower-order and higherorder learning. What little high-quality research is available suggests that students could benefit from knowledge of correct response (KCR) to obtain lower-order learning outcomes. As well, elaborated feedback (EF) seems beneficial for gaining both lower-order and higher-order learning outcomes. Furthermore, this study shows that a number of variables should be taken into account when investigating the effects of feedback on learning outcomes. Implications for future research are discussed.
Keywords: Feedback, computer-based assessment, learning, assessment for learning, systematic review
Fabienne M. van der Kleij, Caroline F. Timmers, Theo J.H.M. Eggen, The effectiveness of methods for providing written feedback through a computer-based assessment for learning: a systematic review in "CADMO" 1/2011, pp 21-38, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2011-001004