Scott Shapiro’s planning theory of law. Remarks about a critical reading

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Author/s Silvia Zorzetto
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/2
Language English Pages 20 P. 65-84 File size 243 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2013-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Nella filosofia del diritto contemporanea il libro Legality di Scott Shapiro rappresenta una delle ricerche più note e discusse sul tema onnicomprensivo della natura del diritto. Nel suo libro Shapiro risponde alla domanda "cos’è il diritto?" concependo il diritto come una speciale forma di pianificazione della vita associata. Il nuovo volume curato da D. Canale e G. Tuzet, intitolato The Planning Theory of Law. A Critical Reading (2013), include alcuni saggi di critica alla teoria di Shapiro . Il presente commento a tale raccolta di saggi critici vuole essere un contributo al dibattito sulle idee di Shapiro e un tentativo di colmare il salto che spesso esiste tra la teoria generale del diritto d’oltreoceano e continentale. Il commento evidenzia in modo particolare la dimensione teleologica e funzionale della Planning Theory of Law di Shapiro e propone di concepire tale teoria come una ricerca originale relativa agli aspetti fisiologici del diritto.

Keywords: Social Plans - Conceptual Analysis - Legal Positivism - Functionalism - Jurisprudence

  1. Beaney, Michael, 1998. What is Analytic Philosophy? Recent Work on the History of Analytic Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 6: 463 ff. DOI: 10.1080/0960878980857100
  2. Beaney, Michael, 2000. Conceptions of Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy. Acta Analytica, 15: 96 ff.
  3. 2001. From Conceptual Analysis to Serious Metaphysics (Critical Notice of Frank Jackson, From Metaphysics to Ethics). International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 9: 521 ff. DOI: 10.1080/0967255011008181
  4. Beaney, Michael, 2007 (ed.). The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. London: Routledge.
  5. Braddon-Mitchell, David, & Nola Robert, 2008. Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Preff.
  6. Burge-Hendrix, Brian, 2013. Plato and the Rule of Law. In Imer B. Flores & Kenneth E. Himma (eds.), Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law. Dordrecht: Springer.
  7. Canale, Damiano, & Giovanni Tuzet, 2013 (eds.). The Planning Theory of Law. A Critical Reading. Dordrecht: Springer.
  8. Coleman, Jules L., 2002. Methodology, In Jules Coleman & Scott Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford U.P.: Oxford.
  9. Culver, Keith C., 2008. Readings in the Philosophy. Toronto: Broadview Preff.
  10. Dewey, John, 2008. Reconstruction in Philosophy. In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey. The Middle Works, 1899-1924, Vol. 12:1920. Essays, Miscellany, and Reconstruction in Philosophy Published during 1920. Carbondale: Southern Illinois U.P.
  11. Gardner, John, 2012. Law as a Leap of Faith. Oxford: Clarendon.
  12. Gometz, Gianmarco, 2011. Le concezioni teleologiche del diritto nella letteratura teorico-giuridica. Verso una classificazione. Sociologia del diritto, 3: 7 ff. DOI: 10.3280/SD2011-00300
  13. Hart, Hebert L.A., 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
  14. Jackson, Frank, 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  15. Jackson, Frank, & Chalmers, David, 2001. Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation. Philosophical Review, 110: 315 ff. DOI: 10.1215/00318108-110-3-31
  16. Moore, Michael S., 1992. Law as a Functional Kind. In Robert George (ed.), Natural Law Theory. Contemporary Essays. Oxford: Clarendon.
  17. 2000. Educating Oneself in Public. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  18. Oberdiek, John, & Dennis Patterson, 2007. Moral Evaluation and Conceptual Analysis in Jurisprudential Methodology. Current Legal Issues: Law and Philosophy, electronic copy available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=925628 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199237159.003.000
  19. Patterson, Dennis, 2006. Notes on the Methodology Debate in Contemporary Jurisprudence: Why Sociology Might Be Interested. In Michael Freeman, ed., Law and Sociology. Oxford: Oxford UP. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282548.003.001
  20. Perri, Stephen R., 1998. Hart’s Methodological Positivism. Legal Theory, 4: 427 ff. DOI: 10.1017/S135232520000110
  21. Ricciardi, Mario, 2008. Diritto e natura. H. L. A Hart e la filosofia di Oxford. Pisa: ETS.
  22. Ryle, Gilbert, 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin.
  23. Shapiro, Scott, 2009. What Is the Rule of Recognition (And Does It Exist)? Yale Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 181, electronic copy available at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract#1304645
  24. 2011. Legality.: Cambridge: Belknap Preff.
  25. Tamanaha, Brian Z., 2012. What Is “General” Jurisprudence? A Critique of Universalistic Claims by Philosophical Concepts of Law. Legal Studies Research Paper Series Paper No. 12-03-02, Washington University in St. Louis School of Law.

Silvia Zorzetto, Scott Shapiro’s planning theory of law. Remarks about a critical reading in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 2/2013, pp 65-84, DOI: 10.3280/SD2013-002003