Re-definition of the social and public intervention in the reconstruction of L’Aquila

Journal title RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE
Author/s Marina Ciampi
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/3 Language Italian
Pages 12 P. 117-128 File size 426 KB
DOI 10.3280/SA2013-003008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Social sciences usually analyze the social consequences of natural disasters. Such consequences, in fact, may entail the disintegration of the social structure and the collapse of the in-depth reasons that guide collective action. For instance, the 2009 earthquake that struck L’Aquila caused a deep rupture in the in the social fabric of the area causing the issue around the reconstruction of the city to be reduced to a merely bureaucratic matter. The community set up new practices of interaction, communication and the uses of spaces; however, trust in the local and national institutions has been undermined mainly because of the discontinuity with governance and the lack of coordination between the different levels of the public administration. The challenge is therefore to identify and manage the structural dynamics according to a clear-cut strategy involving all the actors and going beyond local interest. In this way it will probably be possible to overcome the political and institutional that up not now have undermined the credibility of public authorities.

Keywords: Socio-territorial reconstruction, institutions-individuals, trust

  1. Aromatario P. (2009). Ricomincio da zero anzi da 3,32. Il diario della mia memoria nei giorni dopo la catastrofe. L’Aquila: Easy Libro.
  2. Augé M. (2003). Le temps en ruines. Paris: Éditions Galilée (trad. it. Rovine e macerie. Il senso del tempo. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2004). Bauman Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press (trad. it. Modernità liquida, Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2010).
  3. Beck U. (2007). Weltrisikogesellschaft: Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (trad. it. Conditio humana. Il rischio nell’età globale. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2011).
  4. Bobbio N. (1999). Teoria generale della politica. Torino: Einaudi.
  5. Cattarinussi B. e Pelanda C. (1981). Disastro e Azione Umana: Introduzione Multidisciplinare allo Studio del Comportamento Sociale in Ambienti Estremi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  6. dem Freistudentischen Bund. München-Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot (trad. it. La scienza come professione. Milano: Rusconi, 1997).
  7. Weber M. (1919). Wissenschaft als Beruf, in Geistige Arbeit als Beruf. Vier Vorträge vor
  8. Toti A.M.P. (2009). Fenomenologia della catastrofe. Storie e immagini dal terremoto. In: Aromatario P. Ricomincio da zero anzi da 3,32. Il diario della mia memoria nei giorni dopo la catastrofe. L’Aquila: Easy Libro.
  9. Tönnies F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Darmstadt: Hans Buske (trad. it.: Comunità e società. Calimera: Kurumuny, 2009).
  10. Terporilli C. (2012). Terremoto e politica. Un silenzio assordante. Opere, X, 33: 18-32.
  11. Sorokin P.A. (1945). Man and Society in Calamity. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co.
  12. Schorr J.K. (1987). Some contributions German Katastrophensoziologie can make to the sociology of disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5, 2.
  13. Sarewitz D., Pielke R. and Keykhah M. (2003). Vulnerability and Risk: Some Thoughts from a Political and Policy Perspective. Risk Analysis, 23, 4.
  14. Quarantelli E.L., ed. (1998). What is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question. London: Routledge.
  15. Prince S.H. (1920). Catastrophe and Social Change. Based upon a Sociological Study of the Halifax Disaster. New York: Columbia University Press.
  16. Perraw C. (2007). The Next Catastrophe: Producing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial and Terrorist Disaster. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  17. Nisbet R.A. (1953). The Quest for Community. New York: Oxford University Press (trad. it. La comunità e lo Stato. Studio sull’etica dell’ordine e della libertà. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità, 1957).
  18. Luhmann N. (1968). Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität, Stuttgart: Enke (trad. it. La fiducia. Bologna: il Mulino, 2002).
  19. Ligi G. (2009). Antropologia dei disastri. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  20. Faraone C. (2012). L’Aquila e le sue ricostruzioni. Una cronaca urbanistica. Opere, X, 33: 9-13.
  21. Dominici P. (2010). La società dell’irresponsabilità. L’Aquila, la carta stampata, i “nuovi” rischi, le scienze sociali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  22. Cooley C.H. (1909). Social Organization. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons (trad. it. L’organizzazione sociale. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità, 1963).
  23. Ciampi M. (2011). Forme dell’abitare. Un’analisi sociologica dello spazio borghese. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  24. Ciampi M. (2012). Disastri e dissesto sociale, Opere, X, 33: 14-16.
  25. Ceri P. (2003). La società vulnerabile. Quale sicurezza, quale libertà. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Marina Ciampi, Ri-definizione del sociale e intervento pubblico nella ricostruzione de L’Aquila in "RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE" 3/2013, pp 117-128, DOI: 10.3280/SA2013-003008