Mandatory rules for sales contracts regarding food and agricultural products in Italy: an assessment of article 62 of Law 27/2012

Journal title ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE
Author/s Stefano Ciliberti, Angelo Frascarelli
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1
Language Italian Pages 25 P. 37-61 File size 175 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2014-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In recent years, European farmers have been facing two new phenomena: agricultural commodity price volatility and a decrease in agricultural added value. These issues led the High Level Forum to censure low transparency in relationships between firms and frequently unfair commercial practices, after the European Commission had recognized that the agri-food supply chains were functioning imperfectly. Economic theory considers contracts as a means of coordinating entrepreneurs’ decisions (e.g. in terms of time, quantity, prices and product quality). Nevertheless, in the presence of oligopsony, buyers use contracts to improve and exercise their market power, for example by imposing vertical restraints. This situation is typical of European food supply chains, where highly concentrated sectors (food industry and retail) use their bargaining power against agriculture. In this context, antitrust authorities and eu Member States have sought to resolve the situation by stipulating appropriate competition policy measures. In Italy, Law 27/2012 has recently introduced new mandatory rules regarding sales contracts for agriculture and food products, in order to increase trading transparency and reduce payment times. Using an embedded multiple-case study, carried out through interviews and direct observations, this article analyses the initial effects of the application of the law on the Italian agri-food system.

Keywords: Contracts, market power, antitrust, agri-food system, Italy

Jel codes: Q13, Q18, L14

  1. Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (2007). Indagine sulla distribuzione agroalimentare. Indagini conoscitive, 28. Roma.
  2. Albisinni, F. (2012). La nuova disciplina delle relazioni commerciali in materia di cessione di prodotti agricoli e agroalimentari (o alimentari?). In De Filippis F. (a cura di), Quaderni Gruppo 2013. Crisi economica e manovra di stabilizzazione: quali effetti per l’agroalimentare? (pp. 125-140). Roma: Ed. Tellus.
  3. Brosseau, E., & Glanchant, J.M. (2002). The economics of contracts and the renewal of economies. In Brosseau E., & Glanchant J.M. (ed.), The economics of contracts (pp.3-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Buccirossi, P., Marette, S., & Schiavina, A. (2002). Competition policy and the agribusiness sector in the European Union. European reviews of agricultural economics, 29(3), 373-397. DOI: 10.1093/eurrag/29.3.373
  5. Carlton, D.W., & Perloff, J.M. (1997). Organizzazione industriale. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  6. Cesaretti, G.P., Mariani, A.C., & Sodano, V. (1994). Sistema agroalimentare e mercati agricoli. Bologna: il Mulino.
  7. Commissione europea (2008). I prezzi dei prodotti alimentari in Europa. com(2008), 821 definitivo. Bruxelles.
  8. Commissione europea (2009). Migliore funzionamento della filiera alimentare in Europa. com(2009), 591 definitivo. Bruxelles.
  9. Galizzi, G. (1969). Conferenza nazionale per l’ortofrutticoltura, 3: I processi di integrazione verticale nella produzione ortofrutticola. Bologna: Calderini.
  10. Giacomini, C. (2012). L’articolo 62 del decreto Cresci Italia. Agriregionieuropa, (30), 26-30.
  11. Giangiulio, D., & Mazzantini, G. (2010). Il trasferimento dei prezzi lungo le filiere agroalimentari: una possibile metodologia di analisi per i profili di interesse Antitrust. XLVII Convegno SIDEA “L’agricoltura oltre la crisi”, 22-25 settembre, 2010, Campobasso.
  12. Ismea (2012). La competitività dell’agroalimentare italiano. Check-up 2012. Roma.
  13. Jannarelli, A. (2008). I contratti dell’impresa agricola all’industria di trasformazione. Problemi e prospettive dell’esperienza italiana. Rivista di diritto alimentare, (2), 5-12.
  14. MacDonald, J.M. (2006). Agricultural contracting, competition and antitrust. American journal of agricultural economics, 88(5), 1244-1250. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00940.x
  15. Malassis, L., & Ghersi, G. (a cura di) (1996). Économie de la production et de la consommation (deuxième édition). Paris: Cujas.
  16. Mariani, A., & Viganò, E. (a cura di) (2002). Il sistema agroalimentare dell’Unione europea. Roma: Carocci editore.
  17. Mighell, R.L., & Jones, L.A. (1963). Agricultural Economics Report, 19: Vertical Coordination in Agriculture. Washington dc: usda-ers.
  18. Motta, M. (2004). Competition policy. Theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Pecci, F. (2011). Conoscere come si formano i prezzi nella catena alimentare. Agriregionieuropa,
  20. (27), 1-5.
  21. Pezzoli, A. (2011). La filiera agroalimentare: i profili di rilevanza concorrenziale. Agriregionieuropa, (27), 8-10.
  22. Rama, D. (2010). Ruolo ed evoluzione delle istituzioni di marketing (hybrids) nei nuovi scenari competitivi del sistema agro-alimentare. In Boccaletti S. (a cura di), Atti del XLVI Convegno di Studi “Cambiamenti nel sistema alimentare: nuovi problemi e strategie politiche” (pp. 95-130). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  23. Rosa, F., & Vasciaveo, M. (2010). Dinamiche dei prezzi agricoli: volatilità, causalità ed efficienza dei mercati agricoli. XLVII Convegno SIDEA “L’agricoltura oltre la crisi”, 22-25 settembre, 2010, Campobasso.
  24. Rosa, F., & Vasciaveo, M. (2013). Imperfect competition in the Italian dairy chain: consequences for price transmission and welfare distribution. The 7th Igls-Forum on System dynamics and innovation in food networks, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck, Austria (pp. 275-298).
  25. Russo, C. (2007). Politiche agricole e concorrenza imperfetta: perché la PAC ha bisogno di una politica per la concorrenza. Politica agricola internazionale, (4), 9-21.
  26. Saccomandi, V. (1991). Istituzioni di economia del mercato dei prodotti agricoli. Roma: Reda.
  27. Saccomandi, V. (1999). Economia dei mercati agricoli. Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Sodano, V. (2004). Strumenti di analisi per l’economia dei mercati agroalimentari. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  29. Sodano, V., Sassi, M., & Marchini, A. (2010). Economia agroalimentare: mercati e politiche. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  30. Vavra, P. (2009). Role, usage and motivation for contracting in agriculture. OECD Food, agriculture and fisheries working papers, 16. oecd publishing. DOI: 10.1787/225036745705
  31. Vettas, N. (2006). Market control and competition issues along the commodity value chain. Fao Commodities and Trade Division workshop “Governance, coordination, and distribution along the commodity value chains”, April 4-5, 2006, Rome, Italy (pp. 9-26).
  32. Wu, S. (2006). Contract theory and agricultural policy analysis: a discussion and survey of recent developments. The Australian journal of agricultural and resources economics, 50(4), 490-509. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2006.00317.x
  33. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.

  • It's a jungle out there - the strange animals of economic organization in agri-food value chains S. Ciliberti, A. Frascarelli, pp.283 (ISBN:9789086868445)
  • The Effects of Agricultural Price Instability on Vertical Price Transmission: A Study of the Wheat Chain in Italy Elena Claire Ricci, Massimo Peri, Lucia Baldi, in Agriculture /2019 pp.36
    DOI: 10.3390/agriculture9020036

Stefano Ciliberti, Angelo Frascarelli, L’obbligo dei contratti di cessione dei prodotti agricoli e alimentari: una valutazione degli effetti dell’articolo 62 della legge n. 27/2012 in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 1/2014, pp 37-61, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2014-001003