Evaluation as a profession: an european analysis

Journal title RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione
Author/s Maria Pia Castro, Stefania Fragapane, Francesco Mazzeo Rinaldi
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2013/56-57
Language Italian Pages 30 P. 198-227 File size 308 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIV2013-056010
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article aims to analyze the status of professionalization of the evaluator at the international level, with particular reference to the specialist skills required by the labor market, the role played within organizations and the main issues addressed by the professional community. To address these issues, a first analysis of professions and evaluative tasks described in the International Standard Classification of Occupation 2008 (ISCO08) was carried out, followed by a study of the jobs offers posted on the European Evaluation Society (EES) website. Finally, an analysis was performed on the main topics addressed by the EES LinkedIn group, in order to investigate the consolidation level of the evaluator profession with respect to the areas of analysis previously selected. Key words: evaluator, professionalization, tasks, job offers, social networks

  1. Bonifati C. (2012). Solidarietà sociale e comunità virtuali: un’analisi sociologica in Tigor. Rivista di Scienze della Comunicazione, IV, n. 1: 70-93.
  2. Bourdieu P. (1980). Les sens pratique. Paris, Minuit.
  3. Abbott A. (1988). The System of Profession. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Altschuld J. W. & Engle M., a cura di (1994). The preparation of professional evaluators: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 41–50. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Altschuld J.W. (1999). The case for a voluntary system for credentialing evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation 20(3): 507–17.
  6. Altschuld J.W. (1999). The certification of evaluators: highlights from a report submitted to the board of directors of the American Evaluation Association. American Journal of Evaluation 20(3): 481–93.
  7. Altschuld J.W. (2005). Certification, credentialing, licensure, competencies, and the like: issues confronting the field of evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 20(2): 157–68.
  8. Altschuld J.W. and Austin JT (2005). Certification. In: Mathison S. a cura di, Encyclopedia of Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 49–50.
  9. Anderson, S. B., & Ball, S. (1978). The profession and practice of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Balotta C., Righetti E., Turbati R., Caropreso J., in Vergani A., a cura di (2013). Prove di Valutazione. Libro Bianco sulla valutazione in Italia, FrancoAngeli.
  11. Barber B. (1963). Alcuni problemi di sociologia delle professioni. Daedalus, XCII: 669-688.
  12. Bennato D. (2011). Sociologia dei media digitali. Editori Laterza, Roma.
  13. Boyd D., Ellison N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  14. Castro M.P. (2012). Le professioni in un approccio multidimensionale. Il caso dell’Assistente sociale. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 3: 93-112.
  15. Cleary Y. (2011). Discussions About the Technical Communication Profession: Perspectives from the Blogosphere. Technical Communication, Vol. 58, N. 4.
  16. Cousins J.B., Cullen J, Malik S, and Maicher B. (2009) Debating professional designations for evaluators: reflections on the Canadian process. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation 6(11): 71–82.
  17. Daudistel H. C. & Hedderson J. (1984). Training evaluation researchers. Teaching Sociology, 11, 167-181.
  18. Davis, B. G. (1986). Overview of the teaching of evaluation across disciplines. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 29, 5-14.
  19. Dewey J.D., Montrosse B.E., Schröter D.C., Sullins C.D. and Mattox J.R. (2008). Evaluator Competencies: What’s Taught Versus What’s Sought. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 268-287.
  20. Durkheim E., Le forme elementari della vita religiosa, Comunità, Milano, 1913. Edman J. (2001). New directions in theorizing the professions: the case of urban planning in Sweden. Acta sociologica, 44 (4): 301-311.
  21. Engle M., Altschuld J. W. & Kim, Y.C. (2006). 2002 survey of evaluation preparation programs in universities: An update of the 1992 American Evaluation Associationsponsored study. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 353-359.
  22. Evetts J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4): 406-422.
  23. Feldhusen J., & Hynes R. (1976). Training evaluators with the CIPP model of evaluation. CEDR Quarterly, 9, 17-21.
  24. Goode W. (1957), Community within a community: the professions. American Sociological Review, 22 (2): 194-200.
  25. Granovetter Mark S. (1973). The strength of weak ties American Journal of Sociology. Vol 78, n. 6.
  26. Greenwood E. (1957). Attributes of a Profession. Social Work, 2 (3): 45-55.
  27. Haug M. R. (1973). Deprofessionalization: an alternate hypothesis for the future. The Sociological Review Monograph, 20: 195-211.
  28. House ER (1993) Professional Evaluation: Social Impact and Political Consequences. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
  29. Illich I. (1977). Toward a history of needs. Mondadori, Milano.
  30. ILO – International Labour Office (2012). International Standard Classification of Occupations – ISCO08, Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
  31. Jacob S., Boisvert Y. (2010). To Be or Not to Be a Profession: Pros, Cons and Challenges for Evaluation. Evaluation, 16(4) 349–369.
  32. Johnson T. J., Professions and Power, a cura di, Macmllian, London, 1972.
  33. Jones S.C. and Worthen BR (1999). AEA members’ opinions concerning evaluator certification. American Journal of Evaluation 20(3): 495–506.
  34. King, J. A., Stevahn, L., Ghere, G., & Minnema, J. (2001). Toward a taxonomy of essential program evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 229-247.
  35. Levin-Rozalis M. and Shochot-Reich E. (2009). Professional identity of evaluators in Israel. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 23(1): 141–77.
  36. Lysaght RM and Altschuld JW (2000). Beyond initial certification: the assessment and maintenance of competency in professions. Evaluation and Program Planning 23(1): 95–104.
  37. Merwin J.C. and Weiner P.H. (1985). Evaluation: a profession? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 7(3): 253–9.
  38. Morell J.A. and Flaherty E.W. (1978). The development of evaluation as a profession: current status and some predictions. Evaluation and Programm Planning 1(1): 11–17.
  39. O’Reilly T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications & Strategies, No. 1, First Quarter.
  40. Olsen Linda E. (2008). Professional networking online. A qualitative study on LinkedIn in Norway. The University of Bergen.
  41. Oppenheimer M. (1973). The proletarianization of the professional. The Sociological Review Monograph, 20: 213-227.
  42. Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. NewMedia Society, 11(1&2), pp. 199–220.
  43. Parsons T. (1939). The professions and social structure. Social Forces, 17(4): 457-467.
  44. Petti L. (2011). Apprendimento informale in rete. Dalla progettazione al mantenimento delle comunità online. FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  45. Picciotto R. (2011). The logic of evaluation professionalism. Evaluation, 17(2), 165-180.
  46. Rossi P.H., Lipsey M.W., and Freeman H.E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Russ-Eft D., Bober M. J., de la Teja, I., Foxon, M., & Koszalka, T. A. (2008). Evaluator competencies: Standards for the practice of evaluation in organizations. San Francisco: John Wiley.
  47. Sechrest L. (1980). Evaluation researchers: Disciplinary training and identity. New Directions for Evaluation, 8, 1-18.
  48. Smith M.F. (1999). Should AEA begin a process for restricting membership in the profession of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation 20(3): 521–31.
  49. Smith Nick L. et al. (2011). Looking Ahead: The Future of Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 32, 4, pp. 565-599.
  50. Stevahn L., King J.A., Ghere G. & Minnema J. (2005). Establishing essential competencies for program evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 43-59.
  51. Stufflebeam D.L., & Wingate L.A. (2005). A self-assessment procedure for use in evaluation training. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 544-561.
  52. Wilensky H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70(2): 137-158.
  53. Worthen B.R. (1994). Is evaluation a mature profession that warrants the preparation of evaluation professionals? New Directions for Evaluation 62: 3–15.
  54. Worthen B.R. (1999). Critical challenges confronting certification of evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation 20(3): 533–55.
  55. Worthen B.R., & Sanders J. R. (1991). The changing face of educational evaluation. In J. W. Altschuld, a cura di, Educational evaluation: An evolving field. Theory Into Practice, 30(1), 3–12.

Maria Pia Castro, Stefania Fragapane, Francesco Mazzeo Rinaldi, Professione Valutatore: uno sguardo al contesto europeo in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 56-57/2013, pp 198-227, DOI: 10.3280/RIV2013-056010