Journal title RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Author/s Gabriella Lamonica
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/1
Language Italian Pages 13 P. 79-91 File size 557 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2015-001007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
Both Rousseau and Rawls see extreme inequality as a condition which undermines political liberties. By looking into the relationship between bondage and inequality as it unfolds in Rousseau’s Discours sur l’Inégalité and in Rawls’s reply to Hart on liberty and its priority, a coextension between liberty and the individual can be found, in which liberty plays a normative role. This explains why both Rousseau and Rawls insist on ruling out trade-offs between liberty (or the basic liberties in Rawls’s first principle) and other advantages.
Keywords: Rousseau, Rawls, liberty, advantages, equality, priority.
Gabriella Lamonica, Llibertà contro vantaggi in Rousseau e Rawls in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 1/2015, pp 79-91, DOI: 10.3280/SF2015-001007