Notes on the art of steering the ship

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Author/s Maria Chiara Lipari
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2014/3
Language Italian Pages 17 P. 153-169 File size 134 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2014-003008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article discusses the two classical metaphors of thinking in the philosophy of law and the philosophy of politics: the ship stands for the body politic, while steering is the art of holding the tiller and guiding the vessel, whose etymology is linked to the art of ‘governing’. In Greek culture, navigation was a stochastic technique, whose purpose was to reach a goal and which was nearly always linked to the science of medicine. Many are the suggestions that this metaphor and these links bring to mind. In particular, the essay focuses on the clear meaning that the idea of necessity takes on when at sea: the need to apply the rules of the art, but also the need to break them when exceptional circumstances call for it, and, lastly (the field that law always seems to forget), the need to submit to the preponderant force of external elements and to take them into consideration in something akin to a new natural contract

Keywords: Navigation, Necessity, Steering, Technique, Circumstance

  1. Annas, Julia, 1998. La morale della felicità in Aristotele e nei filosofi dell’età ellenistica. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  2. Arendt, Hannah, 1994. Vita activa. La condizione umana. Milano: Bompiani (tit. orig. The Human Condition, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1958).
  3. Aubenque, Paul, 1963, La prudence chez Aristote. Parigi: Presses Universitaires de France.
  4. Azzoni, Giampaolo, 1991. Cognitivo e normativo: il paradosso delle regole tecniche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  5. Conte, Amedeo Giovanni, 1985. Phénoménologie du langage déontique. In Georges Kalinowski & Filippo Selvaggi, Les fondements logiques de la pensée normative. Roma: Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana.
  6. —, 1983. Regole costitutive, condizione, antinomia. In Uberto Scarpelli (a cura di), La teoria generale del diritto. Problemi e tendenze attuali. Studi dedicati a Norberto Bobbio. Milano: Comunità.
  7. Foucault, Michel, 1996, Discorso e verità nella Grecia antica, Tr. it. Roma: Donzelli (tit. orig. Discourse and Truth. The Problematization of Parrhesia, Evanston Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1985.
  8. —, 2002, L’uso dei piaceri. Milano, Feltrinelli (tit. orig. L’usage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard, 1984).
  9. Gometz, Giancarlo, 2008. Le regole tecniche. Una guida refutabile. Pisa: ETS.
  10. Honig, Bonnie, 2009. Emergency Politics. Paradox, Law, Democracy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press Marramao, Giacomo, 1993. Kairós. Apologia del tempo debito. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  11. Serres, Michel, 1991. Il contratto naturale. Milano: Feltrinelli (tit. orig. Le contrat naturel. Paris: Bourin, 1990).
  12. Von Wright, Georg Henrik, 1963. Norm and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  13. —, Norms, Truth and Logic. In Von Wright, 1983. Practical Reason. Oxford: Blackwell.

Maria Chiara Lipari, Riflessioni sull’arte di governare la nave. in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 3/2014, pp 153-169, DOI: 10.3280/SD2014-003008