Creating and applying law in governance: the case of the Open Method of Co-ordination (OMC)

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Author/s
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2015/3
Language Spanish Pages 17 P. 63-69 File size 189 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2015-003004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The author analyses the characteristics and functioning of the European Union’s Open Method of Co-ordination. This is a mechanism whose purpose is to achieve mediation in social policy between EU member states, using soft law methods. The theoretical discourse around the OMC lionises its legitimacy, in terms both of its input (participation, transparency and responsibility) and of its output (effectiveness). The article maintains that the OMC’s real functioning reveals that it is a mechanism with a low level of effectiveness and serious deficiencies in terms of legitimacy. Finally, the author draws up some forecasts about the future of this mechanism of EU governance in the framework of the Europe 2020 strategy.

Keywords: Open Method of Co-ordination - Governance - Legitimacy - European Union - Social policy

  1. ―, 2007. The End of Democracy as We Know it? The Legitimacy Deficits of Bureaucratic Social Policy Governance. En European Integration, 29, 5: 565-582.
  2. Sabel Charles F., & Jonathan Zeitlin, 2008. Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU. En European Law Journal, 14, 3:271–327.
  3. Trubek, David M., & Louise G. Trubek, 2005. Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Coordination. En European Law Journal, 11, 3: 343-364.
  4. GOV.UK 2012. UK National Social Report Publications.
  5. https://www.gov.uk/.../uknationalsocialreport, consultado el 24/5/2012.
  6. Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2005. Conclusion. The Open Method of Coordination in Action. Theoretical Promise, Empirical Realities, Reform Strategy. En Jonathan Zeitlin & Philippe Poche, with Lars Magnusson (eds.). The Open Method of Coordination in Action. The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies. Brussels: Peter Lang, 447-503.
  7. ―, 2009. The Open Method of Coordination and National Social and Employment Policy Reforms: Influences, Mechanisms, Effects. En Martin Heidenreich & Jonathan Zeitlin (eds.), Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. London-New York: Routledge.
  8. Kröger, Sandra, 2006. When Learning Hits Politics or: Social Policy Coordination Left to the Administrations and the NGOs?. En European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 10 N° 3. Consultado en http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2006003.htm consultado el 31 de marzo de 2011.
  9. Idema, Timo, & R. Daniel Kelemen, 2006. New Modes of Governance, the Open Method of Coordination and Other Fashionable Red Herring. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7, 1: 108-123.
  10. Dawson, Mark, 2010. Transforming into What? New Governance in the EU and the ‘Managerial Sensibility’ in Modern Law. Wisconsin Law Review, 2: 389-440.
  11. Berger, Peter L., & Thomas Luckmann, [1966]1993. The Social Construction of Reality. Traducción castellana. La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
  12. ―, Tracing the Social OMC from Its Origins to Europe 2020. En Egidijus Barcevičius, Timo J. Weishaupt & Jonathan Zeitlin (Coord.), 2014. Assessing the Open Method of Coordination. Institutional Design and National Influence of EU Social Policy Coordination. Palgrave: Macmillan.
  13. Barcevičius, Egidijus, Timo J. Weishaupt & Jonathan Zeitlin, 2014. Institutional Design and National Influence of EU Social Policy Coordination: Advancing a Contradictory Debate. En Egidijus Barcevičius, Timo J. Weishaupt & Jonathan Zeitlin (Coord.), 2014. Assessing the Open Method of Coordination. Institutional Design and National Influence of EU Social Policy Coordination. Palgrave: Macmillan.

, La creación y aplicación del derecho en la gobernanza: el caso del Open Method of Coordination (omc) in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 3/2015, pp 63-69, DOI: 10.3280/SD2015-003004