Religious tolerance between philosophy and Scripture. Spinoza and Pierre Bayle

Journal title SOCIETÀ E STORIA
Author/s Diego Donna
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/154
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 663-676 File size 51 KB
DOI 10.3280/SS2016-154003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The present article proposes a comparison between Spinoza and Bayle on biblical criticism and the problem of tolerance within the context of the profound theologicalpolitical crisis that shook Europe between the late 17th century and the early 18th century. Did Spinoza’s biblical critique play a true role within the context of early 18th century post-Cartesian philosophy? A comparison with Bayle is highly instructive in this sense, in that it allows us to understand Spinoza’s heritage, but also the profound distance between Spinoza’s reading of the relations between philosophy and the scriptures, and the cultural transformations that ensued from the «crisis of European conscience» in the 18th century. The author highlights the divergences between Spinoza and Bayle’s solutions to the problem of tolerance, which are theologicalpolitical in the first case and lead to sceptical results in the second. On these premises, the author intends to evaluate the critical and problematic nature of Spinozist thought with respect to early Enlightenment philosophy.

Keywords: Spinoza, Bayle, biblical critique, tolerance, faith, reason.

  1. Mori G. (1999), Bayle philosophe, Paris, Champion.
  2. Paganini G. (1980), Analisi della fede e critica della ragione nella filosofia di P. Bayle, Firenze, La Nuova Italia.
  3. Meyer L. (1666), Philosophia S. Scripturæ Interpres, Amsterdam, Eleutheropoli. Mignini F. (a cura di) (2007), Spinoza, Opere [M.], Milano, Mondadori.
  4. Preus J.S. (2001), Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authorithy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  5. Adam M. (a cura di) (1966), Malebranche, Traité de morale, Paris, Vrin.
  6. Althusser L. (2000), Sul materialismo aleatorio, trad. it. a cura di V. Morfino e L. Pinzolo, Milano, Unicopli.
  7. Berti S. (2012), Anticristianesimo e libertà. Studi sull’Illuminismo radicale europeo, Bologna, il Mulino.
  8. Bianchi L. (1996), Libre pensée et tolérance. Pierre Bayle et Guy Patin, in M. Magdaleine et al. (a cura di), De l’humanisme aux Lumières. Bayle et le Protestantisme. Mélanges en l’honneur d’Elisabeth Labrousse, Oxford, Paris, Fondation Voltaire, Universitas, pp. 611-622.
  9. Bordoli R. (2001), Ragione e Scrittura tra Descartes e Spinoza, Milano, FrancoAngeli. Brunschvicg L. (1923), Spinoza et ses contemporains, Paris, Alcan.
  10. Cantelli F. (1969), Teologia e ateismo. Saggio sul pensiero filosofico e religioso di Pierre Bayle, Firenze, La Nuova Italia.
  11. Gebhardt C. (a cura di) (1925), Spinoza, Opera [G.], 4 vols. (Tractatus theologico-politicus [TTP]), Heidelberg, C. Winter.
  12. Fréchet P., McKenna A. (2012), Pierre Bayle et la liberté de conscience, Toulouse,
  13. Anacharsis.
  14. Harrison P. (1998), The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  15. Israel J. (2006), Enlightenment Contested. Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man (1670-1752), Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  16. Labrousse E. (a cura di) (1964-1982), Bayle, Œuvres diverses [OD], 5 vols. (Commentaire philosophique sur ces paroles de l’Evangile selon Luc, 14,23 [CP]), Hildesheim, G. Olms.
  17. Labrousse E. (a cura di) (1964), Pierre Bayle, 2 voll., La Hayes, Nijhoff.
  18. McKenna A. (2001), Pierre Bayle, témoin et conscience de son temps, Paris, Champion.
  19. Meinsma K.O. (1983), Spinoza et son cercle. Etude critique historique sur les hétérodoxes hollandais, Paris, Vrin.
  20. Rex T. (1965), Essays on Pierre Bayle and Religious Controversy, La Haye, Nijhoff. Rooden Van P. (1989), Theological, Biblical Scholarship and Rabbinical Studies in
  21. the Seventeenth Century. Costantijn L’Empereur [1591-1648] Professor of Hebrew and Theology at Leiden, Leiden, New York, København, Köln, Brill.
  22. Secrétan C., Dragon T., Bove L. (a cura di) (2007), Qu’est-ce que les lumières radicales: libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’âge classique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam.
  23. Verbeek Th. (2002), Spinoza’s Theologico-political Treatise: exploring ‘the will of God’, Burlington, Ashgate.
  24. Verbeek Th. (1999), Johannes Clauberg (1622-1665) and Cartesian Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, Dordrecht-Boston-London, Kluwer Academic Publisher. Vernière P. (1954), Spinoza et la pensée française avant la Révolution, 2 voll., Paris, PUF.

  • Quale storia della società? Uno sguardo sull'epoca moderna Paola Bianchi, in SOCIETÀ E STORIA 178/2023 pp.711
    DOI: 10.3280/SS2022-178005

Diego Donna, La tolleranza religiosa tra filosofia e Scrittura. Spinoza e Pierre Bayle in "SOCIETÀ E STORIA " 154/2016, pp 663-676, DOI: 10.3280/SS2016-154003