Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Arman Fadaei
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/84
Language English Pages 8 P. 167-174 File size 342 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2018-084023
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The debate around informal urbanism has been evolving in planning literature since 1960s. Started by Hart’s notion of informal economy (1973), the term soon found its way into mainstream planning literature. Since then, there has been different approaches regarding both ‘understanding’ and ‘mediation’ in informal city. What have been less discussed in the literature are the place based studies by global South scholars that establish their analysis on the ‘lived experiences’ of residents (Holston, 2009). Even though some research has attempted to present such views, there is little research done on discrepancies between current formal urban planning systems and inhabitants urgencies. In conclusion, attention towards addressing the role of urban planning deficits in emergence of informal settlements seems to be disproportionately low across the literature, calling for another deficit to be addressed.
Keywords: Keywords: urban informality; urban planning; literature review
Arman Fadaei, Formal-informal nexus in academic debates. A literature review in "TERRITORIO" 84/2018, pp 167-174, DOI: 10.3280/TR2018-084023