Un monstre parfait. Le savoir médical face au corps féminin (XVIème siècle, France et Italie)

Journal title HISTORIA MAGISTRA
Author/s Sofia Zuccoli
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/27
Language Italian Pages 16 P. 20-35 File size 108 KB
DOI 10.3280/HM2018-027003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Representations of the female body in Renaissance medicine have an ancient origin, based on the androcentric paradigm of the Aristotelian and Galenic traditions. At the end of the Sixteenth-century, many physicians discuss this model by elaborating paradoxical explanations about female nature. The question of the female body’s monstrosity is a really problematic point. This article examines some extracts from the treatise De Generatione et Partu Hominis by Domenico Terelio and from the manual Trois livres appartenant aux infirmitez et maladies des femmes by Jean Liébault in order to underline the effects of this controversy on the construction of modern medical knowledge. Even if it tries to eliminate common sense’s prejudices to become a science, early modern medicine remains anchored to cultural stereotypes that invalidate its rational thoughts.

Keywords: Early modern medicine, Early modern gynaecology, Gender and medicine, Female monstrosity, Domenico Terelio, Jean Liébault.

  1. Aristote, Historia Animalium, I 6, 491a20, trad. fr. de Pierre Louis, Les Belles Lettres, Paris 1964, tome I.
  2. Bourbon, Florence, Jean Liébault (1535-1596), médecin hippocratique?: vers la gynécologie moderne, in «Renaissance and Reformation/Renaissance et Réforme», vol. 33, n. 3, 2010, pp. 61-84.
  3. Braidotti, Rosi, Madri, mostri, macchine, Manifestolibri, Roma, 1996.
  4. Brill, Sara, Animality and Sexual Difference in the Timaeus, in Jeremy Bell e Michael Naas (a cura di) Plato’s Animals, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis 2015.
  5. Cettour, Denis, Le monstre, un problème de filiation, in Jean-Claude Beaune (a cura di), La vie et la mort des monstres, Champ Vallon, Ceyzérieu 2004, pp. 167-187.
  6. Galien, De usu patium corporis humani, II. 297, trad. fr. de Charles Daremberg, OEuvres Anatomiques, Physiologiques et Médicales de Galien, Baillère, Paris 1854, Tome 2.
  7. Hoffmann, Geneviève, Pandora, la jarre et l’espoir, in «Études rurales», vol. 97, n. 1, 1985, pp. 119-132.
  8. King, Helen, Midwifery, Obstetrics and The Rise of Gynaecology: The Uses of a Sixteenth-century Compendium, Aldershot, Ashgate 2007.
  9. Laqueur, Thomas, La fabrique du sexe: essai sur le corps et le genre en Occident, Gallimard, Paris 2013.
  10. Liébault, Jean, Trois livres appartenant aux infirmitez et aux maladies des femmes, Jacques Du Puy, Paris 1582.
  11. Maclean, Ian, The Renaissance Notion of Woman: A Study in The Fortunes of Scholasticism and Medical Science in European Intellectual Life, Cambridge University Press, 1980.
  12. Mercurio, Girolamo, Marinello Giovanni, Medicina per le donne nel Cinquecento, a cura di Maria Luisa Altieri Biagi (et al.), Utet, Torino 1992.
  13. Niccoli, Ottavia, “Menstruum quasi monstruum”: parti mostruosi e tabù mestruale nel ’500, in «Quaderni storici», vol. 15, n. 44, 2, agosto 1980, pp. 402-428.
  14. Pomata, Gianna, Was there a Querelle des Femmes in Early Modern Medicine?, in «ARENAL», 20, 2, 2013, pp. 313-341.
  15. Roger, Jacques, Les Sciences de la vie dans la pensée française du XVIIIe siècle. La génération des animaux de Descartes à l’Encyclopédie, Armand Colin, Poitiers 1963.
  16. Roux, Olivier, Monstres: une histoire générale de la tératologie des origines à nos jours, CNRS Éditions via OpenEdition, Paris 2016.
  17. Sissa, Giulia, Il corpo della donna. Lineamenti di una ginecologia filosofica, in Silvia Campese, Paola Manuli e Giulia Sissa (a cura di), Madre Materia. Sociologia e biologia della donna greca, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino 1983, pp. 81-145.
  18. Taruffi, Cesare, Storia della teratologia, Regia tipografia, Bologna 1881.
  19. Terelio, Domenico, De generatione et partu hominis, Lugduni, 1578.
  20. Vésale, André, De humani corporis fabrica, Jean Oporinus, Bâle 1555.
  21. Worth-Stylianou, Valerie, Les traités d’obstétrique en langue française au seuil de la modernité. Bibliographie critique des «divers travaulx» d’Eucharius Rösslin (1536) à l’«Apologie de Louyse Bourgeois sage femme» (1627), vol. 1, Droz, Genève 2006.

  • « In mulieribus […] memoria felicior ». Mémoire et différence des sexes selon les médecins modernes (xvie et xviie siècles) Sofia Zuccoli, in Cahiers François Viète /2024 pp.15
    DOI: 10.4000/12ju9

Sofia Zuccoli, Un monstre parfait. Le savoir médical face au corps féminin (XVIème siècle, France et Italie) in "HISTORIA MAGISTRA" 27/2018, pp 20-35, DOI: 10.3280/HM2018-027003