Demonstration propter quid and fourth per se mode in Buridan’s Summulae de demonstrationibus.

Journal title RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Author/s Amos Corbini
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/3
Language Italian Pages 24 P. 505-528 File size 132 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2020-003007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Some recent studies show in John Buridan a noteworthy degree of originality and innovation in his treatment of Aristotle’s theory of science, for example concerning the doctrines of subalternation of the sciences, or some aspects of the doctrine of definition, which are between the main themes of Posterior Analytics. In this paper, two other topics are investigated: first, the interpretation of the fourth mode of per se predication, about which Buridan in the Summulae proposes a new, original and interesting view definitely overcoming either the previous exegetical tradition, or the opinion Buridan himself expresses in his Questiones on Aristotle’s text. The second is the topic of propter quid demonstration, that Buridan deepens also in order to go beyond the old and maybe almost outdated quaestio de medio demonstrationis. But, what is more, he is higly consistent and very original in connecting these two topics: so, he gives a new unity and systematic order also to some other minor aspect of his reading of Aristotelian theory.

Keywords: John Buridan, demonstration, per se predication, Aristotelian tradition, theory of science.

  1. - Boralevi 1996: Lea Campos Boralevi, Introduzione a P. Cunaeus, De Republica Hebraeorum, Centro Editoriale Toscano, Firenze 1996.
  2. - Boralevi 2011: Lea Campos Boralevi, Ascesa e declino di un modello federale: la Respublica Hebraeorum nell’Europa moderna, in Ead. (a cura di), Challenging Centralism. Decentramento e autonomie nel pensiero politico europeo, Firenze University Press, Firenze 2011, pp. 73-88.
  3. - Bove 2002: Laurent Bove, La strategia del conatus. Affermazione e resistenza in Spinoza [1999], tr. it. Mimesis, Milano 2002.
  4. - Bove 2014: Laurent Bove, Linguaggio-Potere: il nodo dell’interpretazione, «Etica & Politica», 16 (2014), 1, pp. 55-66.
  5. - Caporali 2014: Riccardo Caporali, Immagini di Mosè (in Machiavelli e Spinoza), «Etica & Politica», 16 (2014), 1, pp. 67-91.
  6. - Carlisle 2017: Clara Carlisle, Spinoza’s Acquiescentia, «Journal of the History of Philosophy», 15 (2017), 2, pp. 209-236.
  7. - Collacciani 2020: Domenico Collacciani et al. (sous la direction de), Philosophie, religion, pouvoir. Lectures du Traité théologico-politique, ENS Éditions, Lyon (in corso di pubblicazione).
  8. - Di Cesare 2012: Donatella Di Cesare, De Republica Hebraeorum. Spinoza e la teocrazia, «Teoria», 32 (2012), pp. 213-228.
  9. - Esposito 2018: Roberto Esposito, Politica e negazione. Per una filosofia affermativa, Einaudi, Torino 2018.
  10. - Esposito 2020: Roberto Esposito, Pensiero istituente, Einaudi, Torino 2020.
  11. - Gaspari 2012: Ilaria Gaspari, Immaginazione produttiva e profezia, fra Maimonide e Spinoza, «Teoria», 32 (2012), pp. 169-197.
  12. - Grotius 2000: Hugo Grotius, The Antiquity of the Batavian Republic [1610], edited by Jan Waszink, Leuven University Press, Leuven 2000.
  13. - Grottanelli 2007: Cristiano Grottanelli, La religione d’Israele prima dell’Esilio, in Ebraismo, a cura di Giovanni Filoramo, Laterza, Roma-Bari 2007 [1995], pp. 3-51.
  14. - James 2014: Susan James, Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics. The Theological-Political Treatise, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014. - «Il pensiero politico» 2002: «Il pensiero politico», 35 (2002), 3, pp. 365-521 (numero dedicato alla “Politeia Biblica”).
  15. - Israël 2019: Nicolas Israël, Spinoza et la résistance tribale, «La Pensée», 398 (Avril/Juin 2019), pp. 24-36.
  16. - Lantoine 2020: Jacques-Louis Lantoine, L’inessentiel et ses raisons. Le fait religieux et l’investissement des corps dans le chapitre V du Traité théologico-politique, in Collacciani 2020.
  17. - Laveran 2019: Sophie Laveran, Amour, piété et dévotion envers la patrie, «La Pensée », 398 (Avril/Juin 2019), pp. 37-51.
  18. - Lordon 2010: Frédéric Lordon, Capitalisme, désir et servitude. Marx et Spinoza, La Fabrique, Paris 2010.
  19. - Lordon 2015, Frédéric Lordon, Imperium. Structures et affects des corps politiques, La Fabrique, Paris 2015.
  20. - Lucas 2019: Felipe Jardim Lucas, A memória da cidade e o conflito. Formação do direito de resistência e o uso da História em Maquiavel, tesi di dottorato, Pontíficia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, discussa il 31 luglio 2019.
  21. - Macherey 2019: Pierre Macherey, Sagesse ou ignorance? La question de Spinoza, Éditions Amsterdam, Paris 2019.
  22. - Morfino 2020: Vittorio Morfino, De la simulatio à la revelatio. Quelques considérations sur le chapitre XVIIe du TTP, in Collacciani 2020.
  23. - Nadler 2005: Steven Nadler, L’eresia di Spinoza [2001], tr. it. Einaudi, Torino 2005.
  24. - Nadler 2013: Steven Nadler, Un libro forgiato allʼinferno: lo scandaloso Trattato di Spinoza e la nascita della secolarizzazione [2011], tr. it. Einaudi, Torino 2013.
  25. - Nelson 2010: Eric Nelson, The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2010.
  26. - Price 1994: Jonathan. L. Price, Holland and the Dutch Republic in the Seventeenth Century. The Politics of Particularism, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1996.
  27. - Spinoza 1972: Baruch Spinoza, Opera [1677], hrsg. Carl Gebhardt, Carl Winters, Heidelberg 1972 (4 volumi).
  28. - Spinoza 1974: Baruch Spinoza, Epistolario, a cura di Antonio Droetto, Einaudi, Torino 19742.
  29. - Spinoza 1988: Spinoza, Etica, a cura di Emilia Giancotti, Editori Riuniti, Roma 1988.
  30. - Spinoza 1999: Baruch Spinoza, Trattato politico, a cura di Paolo Cristofolini, ETS, Pisa 1999.
  31. - Spinoza 2007: Benedictus de Spinoza, Trattato teologico-politico, a cura di Pina Totaro, Bibliopolis, Napoli 2007.
  32. - Vinciguerra 2020: Lorenzo Vinciguerra, La prophétie et les prophètes, in Collacciani 2020.
  33. - Visentin 2012a: Stefano Visentin, Volonté d’être esclave et désir d’être libre. Ambivalence de la multitude chez Spinoza, in Spinoza transalpin. Les interprétations actuelles en Italie, sous la direction de Chantal Jaquet et Pierre François Moreau, Publications de la Sorbonne, Paris 2012, pp. 183-199.
  34. - Visentin 2012b: Stefano Visentin, La communis libertas nel Tractatus theologico-politicus, in Spinoza. La potenza del comune, a cura di Daniela Bostrenghi et als., Olms Verlag, Hildeseim 2012, pp. 151-164.
  35. - Visentin 2014: Stefano Visentin, «Hodie nullos habemus prophetas». Spinoza, i Collegianti e la repubblica, «Etica & Politica», 16 (2014), 1, pp. 188-213 - Visentin 2019: Stefano Visentin, From Security to Peace and Concord. The Building of a Free Commonwealth in Spinoza’s Political Treatise, «Theoria», 66 (2019), 2, pp. 71-90.
  36. - Walzer 1986: Michael Walzer, Esodo e rivoluzione [1985], tr. it. Feltrinelli, Milano 1986.
  37. - Weststeijn 2012: Artuhr Weststeijn, Commercial Republicanism in the Dutch Golden Age. The Political Thought of Johan & Pieter de la Court, Brill, Leiden-Boston 2012.

Amos Corbini, Dimostrazione propter quid e quarto modo per se nelle Summulae de demonstrationibus di Giovanni Buridano in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 3/2020, pp 505-528, DOI: 10.3280/SF2020-003007