The illumination of history

Journal title PSICOANALISI
Author/s Michael Feldman
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2023/2
Language Italian Pages 11 P. 81-91 File size 176 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSI2023-002004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Formulations regarding the patient’s history have not only played an important part in understanding the patient, but interpretations explicitly linking the present with the past have been seen as central to the therapeutic process. In this paper the author considers the role of historical reconstruction in bringing about psychic change. He emphasizes the therapeutic value that lies in the exploration of the way the patient’s history is embodied in his internal object relationships, becoming manifested in the transference-countertransference relationship. The author presents clinical material which he suggests allowed the analyst to follow the way the patient’s internal object relations, coloured by her history, became expressed and played out in the sessions. He suggests that, when these processes can be followed and addressed in the present, this may lead to a diminution in the underlying anxieties. This can thus promote psychic change by freeing the patient’s capacity to achieve a sense of connection with her history, and to tolerate the meaning of what emerges, which illuminates both the present and the past.

Keywords: historical reconstruction, psychic change, object relations.

  1. Freud S. (1937). Constructions in analysis. In: S.E. vol. 23, London: Hogart Press, pp. 255-270.
  2. Joseph B. (1996). Uses of the past in the psychoanalytic process. Unpublished manuscript.
  3. Kris E. (1956a). The personal myth: A problem in psychoanalytic technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 4, 4: pp. 653-681. DOI: 10.1177/00030651560040040
  4. Kris E. (1956b). The recovery of childhood memories in psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 11, 1: pp. 54–88. DOI: 10.1080/00797308.1956.1182278
  5. Laplanche J. (1992). Interpretation between determinism and hermeneutics: A restatement of the problem. The International Journal of PsychoAnalysis, 73, 3: pp. 429-45.
  6. Spillius E. (2007). Encounters with Melanie Klein: Selected Papers of Elizabeth Spillius (P. Roth, & R. Rusbridger, Eds.) London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/978020394701
  7. Strachey J. (1999). The nature of the therapeutic action of psycho-analysis. 1934. The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research, 8, 1: pp. 66-65.
  8. Viderman S. (1974). La bouteille a la mer. Revue française de psychanalyse, 38: pp. 323-384.
  9. Bion W.R. (1967). Notes on memory and desire. Psychoanalytic Forum, pp. 271-80. Reprinted in: Bott Spillius E. (1988). Melanie Klein Today, vol. 2: Mainly Theory, London: Routledge, 1988.
  10. Frank A. (1991). Psychic change and the analyst as biographer: Transference and reconstruction. International Journal of Psychoanalisis, 72, 22: p. 6.
  11. Freud S. (1912). The dynamics of transference. In: S.E. vol. 12, London: Hogart Press, p. 97-108.
  12. Freud S. (1923). Two encyclopaedia articles. In: S.E. vol. 18, London: Hogart Press, pp. 235-54.

Michael Feldman, L’illuminazione della storia in "PSICOANALISI" 2/2023, pp 81-91, DOI: 10.3280/PSI2023-002004