The two “governances” of the PNRR: opposite theories of political direction hybridized
Journal title DIRITTO COSTITUZIONALE
Author/s Silvia Niccolai
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/1
Language Italian Pages 25 P. 19-43 File size 208 KB
DOI 10.3280/DT2024-001002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
Confronting the two organizational models adopted by the Draghi and Meloni governments for the implementation of the PNRR, the article argues that Draghi's one was seen, by many scholars, as concretizing the ideal type of a monocraticled Cabinet, strong but constrained (because controlled by the EU and by the President of the Re-public) and just (thanks to the objectives it pursues). The arguments in support of this view, the article maintains, mix the two opposite theories, normative and existential, on the function of political direction and, not without reworking in a teleologic way another long standing “existentialist” topic, that concerning the indeterminacy of Italian Consti-tution’s rules on the form of government, they mirror a more profound split, between “prescription” and “description”, that from long runs through our constitutional thought.
Keywords: PNRR, indirizzo politico, Governo, forma di Governo, Presidente del Consiglio, Costituzione; PNRR, Function of political direction, Cabinet, Form of government, Prime Minister, Constitution.
Silvia Niccolai, Le governance del PNRR nel dibattito dottrinale: l’ibridazione fra le opposte teorie dell’indirizzo politico in "DIRITTO COSTITUZIONALE" 1/2024, pp 19-43, DOI: 10.3280/DT2024-001002