Exploring (in)congruence between academic employers and academic parents’ aspirations for, and enactment of, gender justice in relation to family leave

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Author/s Clare Matysova
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/168
Language English Pages 17 P. 71-87 File size 212 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2024-168004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The gender pay gap (13.7% in 2022 in the UK Higher Education (HE) sector) provides an overall snapshot of gender inequality in a specific setting. The causes of the gender pay gap are multifaceted but inextricably linked to the transition to parenthood. However, despite the transformative potential of family leave policy and practice as a strategy to progress gender equality, there has been less focus on HEIs’ approaches to supporting transition to parenthood as a strategy to tackle the gender pay gap. I employ the Capability Approach (CA) combined with a discursive conceptualisation of gender to explore how gender norms shape parents’ decision-making within university workplace cultural contexts. This study contributes evidence of incongruence between parents’ gender justice aspirations, their experiences and HE employer gender justice strategies. The study identifies the need to explore how gender justice is framed, and translated in practice, within HE employer EDI strategies.

Keywords: Gender justice, family leave

  1. Advance_HE. (2023). The Transformed UK Athena Swan Charter [Online]. Advance_HE. Available: -- https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/equality-charters/transformed-uk-athena-swan-charter [Accessed 3rd June 2023].
  2. Baird M., O’Brien M. (2015). Dynamics of parental leave in Anglophone countries: the paradox of state expansion in liberal welfare regimes. Community, Work & Family, 18: 198-217. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2015.102175
  3. Bamberg M., Georgakopoulou A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28: 377-396. DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.01
  4. Beck U., Beck-Gernsheim E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
  5. Becker G.S. (1993). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.
  6. BRIGHT_HORIZONS (2023). Parental Leave and Family Support Benchmark. Bright Horizons Family Solutions LLC.
  7. Burnett S.B., Gatrell C.J., Cooper C.L. and Sparrow P. (2013). Fathers at Work: A Ghost in the Organizational Machine. Gender, Work & Organization, 20: 632-646.
  8. Butler J. (1990). Gender Trouble. Routledge.
  9. Cahusac E., Kanji S. (2014). Giving Up: How Gendered Organizational Cultures Push Mothers Out. Gender, Work & Organization, 21: 57-70.
  10. Clavero S., Galligan Y. (2021). Delivering gender justice in academia through gender equality plans? Normative and practical challenges. Gender, Work & Organization, 28: 1115-1132.
  11. Cornelius N., Skinner D. (2005). An alternative view through the glass ceiling. Women in Management Review, 20: 595-609. DOI: 10.1108/0964942051063522
  12. Costa Dias M., Joyce R. and Parodi F. (2021). The gender pay gap in the UK: children and experience in work. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36: 855-881.
  13. Drew E., Marschall C. (2020). Work-life balance in academia - Myth or reality? In: Drew E. and Canavan S., eds., The Gender-Sensitive University. 1st ed.: Routledge.
  14. Epifanio M., Troeger V. (2018). Maternity leaves in Academia: why are some UK universities more generous than others? Coventry: University of Warwick. Department of Economics.: Warwick economics research papers series.
  15. Fineman M. (2009). Evolving Images of Gender and Equality: A Feminist Journey. New England Law Review, 43.
  16. Forbes S., Birkett H. and Smith P. (2021). What motivates employers to improve their Shared Parental Leave and pay offers? London, UK: Government Equalities Office.
  17. Frank A. (2010). Letting Stories Breathe - A Socio-Narratology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  18. Fraser N. (2013). After the Family Wage: A Postindustrial Thought Experiment. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London, UK: Verso.
  19. GOV.UK. (2019). ‘Share the Joy’ - Campaign that promotes shared parental leave rights [Online]. -- Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-share-the-joy-campaign-promotes-shared-parental-leave-rights-for-parents [Accessed].
  20. Hakim C. (1998). Developing a Sociology for the Twenty-First Century: Preference Theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 49: 137-143.
  21. Hakim C. (2003). Models of the Family in Modern Societies: Ideals and Realities. Routledge.
  22. Hobson B. (2018). Gendered Dimensions and Capabilities: Opportunities, Dilemmas and Challenges. Critical Sociology, 44: 883-898. DOI: 10.1177//089692051668323
  23. Husu L. (2020). What does not happen: Interrogating a tool for building a gender-sensitive university. The Gender-Sensitive University. Routledge.
  24. IWD_CAMPAIGN. (2023). Equality-versus-Equity-What-s-the-difference-as-we-EmbraceEquity-for-IWD-2023-and-beyond [Online]. Available: https://www.internationalwomensday.com/Missions/18707/Equality-versus-Equity-What-s-the-difference-as-we-EmbraceEquity-for-IWD-2023-and-beyond [Accessed 2023].
  25. Jorgense T. (2018). Universities’ strategies and approaches towards diversity, equity and inclusion: examples from across Europe. European University Association Brussels.
  26. Kaufman G. (2018). Barriers to equality: why British fathers do not use parental leave. Community, Work & Family, 21: 310-325. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2017.130780
  27. Kelland J., Lewis D. and Fischer V. (2022). Viewed with suspicion, considered idle and mocked-working caregiving fathers and fatherhood forfeits. Gender, Work & Organization, 29: 1578-1593.
  28. Koslowski A. (2022). Review article: Parenting leaves, workplace characteristics, male health, and the pandemic: Currents in policy-related fatherhood research in higher income countries. Journal of Family Research, 35.
  29. Koslowski A., Blum S. and Dobrotić I. (2022). Chapter 27: Leave policy in the time of pandemic: new developments and lessons learned. In: Dobrotić I., Blum S. and Koslowski A., eds., Research Handbook on Leave Policy: Parenting and Social Inequalities in a Global Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  30. Lewis J., Giullari S. (2005). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: the search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society, 34: 76-104. DOI: 10.1080/030851404200032934
  31. LONDONMETUNIVERSITY (2023). London Met announces full year of paid parental leave for staff.
  32. Lynch K., Kalaitzake M. and Crean M. (2021). Care and affective relations: Social justice and sociology. The Sociological Review, 69: 53-71. DOI: 10.1177/003802612095274
  33. Matysova C. (2023). Family leave is a gender equity issue. Available from: https://wonkhe.com/blogs/family-leave-is-a-gender-equity-issue/ [Accessed 03.02.2024 2024].
  34. Miller J. (2022). Inclusion at Work 2022 - Findings from the inclusion and diversity survey 2022. In: DEVELOPMENT, C. I. O. P. A. (ed.). London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
  35. Miller T. (2011). Falling back into Gender? Men’s Narratives and Practices around First-time Fatherhood. Sociology, 45: 1094-1109. DOI: 10.1177/003803851141918
  36. Moreau M.-P., Robertson M. (2019). ‘You Scratch My Back and I’ll Scratch Yours’? Support to Academics Who Are Carers in Higher Education. Social Sciences, 8: 164.
  37. Morison T., Macleod C. (2013). When veiled silences speak: reflexivity, trouble and repair as methodological tools for interpreting the unspoken in discourse-based data. Qualitative Research, 14: 694-711. DOI: 10.1177/146879411348812
  38. Ndzi E. (2023). An Analysis of Shared Parental Leave Policies in UK Universities. International Journal of Law and Society, 6: 46-53.
  39. Ndzi E.G. (2021). The Devastating Impact of Gender Discrimination on Shared Parental Leave in the UK. International Journal of Law and Society, 4: 254-261.
  40. Nentwitch J.C., Kelan E.K. (2014). Towards a Topology of ‘Doing Gender’: An Analysis of Empirical Research and Its Challenges. Gender, Work & Organization, 21: 121-134.
  41. O’Keefe T., Courtois A. (2019). ‘Not one of the family’: Gender and precarious work in the neoliberal university. Gender, Work & Organization, 26: 463-479.
  42. Orgad S. (2019). Heading Home - Motherhood, Work, and the Failed Promise of Equality, Columbia University Press.
  43. Rawls J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press.
  44. Riessman C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  45. Rosa R., Clavero S. (2020). The Challenge of Neoliberalism and Precarity for Gender Sensitivity in Academia. In: Drew E. and Canavan S., eds., The Gender-Sensitive University. A Contradiction in Terms? London: Routledge.
  46. Saldaña J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
  47. Sallee M.W. (2012). The Ideal Worker or the Ideal Father: Organizational Structures and Culture in the Gendered University. Research in Higher Education, 53, 782-802.
  48. Sen A. (2009). Capability: Reach and Limit. In: Martinetti E.C. and Sen A., eds., Debating Global Society: Reach and Limits of the Capability Approach. Milano: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
  49. Shuman A. (2015). Story Ownership and Entitlement. The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. In: De Fina A., Georgakopoulou A., eds., The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  50. Squire E.C., Davis M., Esin C., Andrewes M., Harrison B., Hyden L. and Hyden M. (2014). What is Narrative Research? . In: Andrews M., Squire C., Tamboukou M., eds., Doing Narrative Research. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  51. Stephenson R. (Forthcoming). Show me the money - an exploration of the gender pay gap in higher education. Higher Education Policy Institute.
  52. UAL (2023). University of the Arts London’s latest Gender Pay Gap report. University of the Arts.
  53. UCEA (2023). Examining the gender pay gap in HE [Online]. Available: https://www.ucea.ac.uk/library/infographics/gender-pay/ [Accessed 13.09.2023 2023].
  54. Wilkinson K., Rouse J. (2023). Solo-living and childless professional women: Navigating the ‘balanced mother ideal’ over the fertile years. Gender, Work & Organization, 30: 68-85.
  55. WOMEN_AND_EQUALITIES_COMMITTEE (2016). Gender Pay Gap, Second Report of Session 2015–16. UK: House of Commons.
  56. Woodhams C., Trojanowski G. and Wilkinson K. (2022). Merit Sticks to Men: Gender Pay Gaps and (In)equality at UK Russell Group Universities. Sex Roles, 86: 544-558.
  57. Yerkes M.A. Javornik J. and Kurowska A. (2019). Social Policy and the Capability Approach: Concepts, measurements and application. London, UK: Policy Press.

Clare Matysova, Exploring (in)congruence between academic employers and academic parents’ aspirations for, and enactment of, gender justice in relation to family leave in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 168/2024, pp 71-87, DOI: 10.3280/SL2024-168004