Urban dimension of Crypto mines dynamics: A spatial approach. USA focus

Journal title ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI
Author/s Stefano De Falco
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/139
Language English Pages 22 P. 115-136 File size 336 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2024-139006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This work investigates data mining phenomenon in a spatial approach, focused on the United States. The results reveal a predilection of “miners” in areas with low energy costs, but not of a rural type, as it could be expected, but rather in geographical proximity to urban areas where it is easier to reach ICT workers and maintenance and assistance services for data “factories”. This closeness, however, often triggers conflictual dynamics.

Keywords: data mining; spatial approach; urban; energy; USA

  1. Albanese V. e Graziano T. (2020). Place, cyberplace e le nuove geografie della comunicazione Come cambiano i territori per effetto delle narrazioni online. Bologna: Bononia University.
  2. Anselin L., Cohen J., Cook D., Gorr W. and Tita G. (2000). Spatial analyses of crime. Criminal justice, 4(2): 213-262.
  3. Arthur W.B. (2021). Foundations of complexity economics. Nature Review Physics, 3: 136-145.
  4. Bendiksen C., Gibbons S. and Lim E. (2019). The Bitcoin Mining Network – Trends, Average Creation Cost, Electricity Consumption and Sources. CoinShares Available at: https://blog.coinshares.com/research/home.
  5. Blandin A. et al. (2019). Global Cryptoasset Regulatory Landscape Study. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper, 23/2019. -- Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3379219.
  6. Capello R. (2011). Location, regional growth and local development theories. Aestimum, 58: 1-25.
  7. Capello R. (2012). Regional economics: Theoretical achievements and challenges. Timisoara Journal of Economics, 5(18): 313-335.
  8. CBECI – Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (2021). Home page. -- Available at: https://cbeci.org.
  9. Christaller W. (1933). Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Jena: Fischer.
  10. D’Antonio P. and Scalcione V.N. (2020). Digital Humanities: ICT for a Teaching of Inclusion. Agricultural Research & Technology, 23(4): 113-127. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2020.22.55624
  11. De Falco S. (2019). Digital and urban spaces: Oxymoron or binomial? Urban transformations in the digital era. Geography Compass, 13(10): 1-13.
  12. De Vries A. (2018). Bitcoin’s growing energy problem. Joule 2(5): 801-805.
  13. Devriendt L., Derudder B. and Witlox F. (2008). Cyberplace and Cyberspace: Two Approaches to Analyzing Digital Intercity Linkages. Journal of Urban Technology, 15(2): 5-32.
  14. Dodge M. and Kitchin R. (2001). Mapping Cyberspace. London: Routledge. Floridi L. (2012). La rivoluzione dell’informazione. Torino: Codice edizioni. Giungato P., Rana R., Tarabella A. and Tricase C. (2017). Current Trends in Sustainability of Bitcoins and Related Blockchain Technology. Sustainability, 9(12): 2214.
  15. Gray C.S. (2013). Making Strategic Sense of Cyber Power: Why the Sky Is Not Falling. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
  16. Han D., Rogerson P.A., Bonner M.R., Nie J., Vena J.E., Muti P., Maurizio Trevisan M. and Freudenheim J.L. (2005). Assessing spatio-temporal variability of risk surfaces using residential historydata in a case control study of breast cancer. International Journal of Health Geographics, 4(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-4-
  17. Hillis K. (1998). On the Margins: The Invisibility of Communications in Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22: 543-566.
  18. Kellerman A. (2002), The Internet on Earth: A Geography of Information. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  19. Krause M.J. and Tolaymat T. (2018). Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies. Nature Sustainability, 1: 711-718.
  20. Krugman P. (2011). The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-aged. Regional Studies, 45(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.53712
  21. Kwan M.P. (2002). Time, Information Technologies and the Geographies of Everyday Life. Urban Geography, 23: 471-82.
  22. Lally N., Kay K. and Thatcher J. (2022). Computational parasites and hydropower: A political ecology of Bitcoin mining on the Columbia River. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(1): 18-38. DOI: 10.1177/251484861986760
  23. Lösch A. (1940). Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Jena: Fischer. Mcdougall M. (2014). An Investigation of the Theory of Disruptive Innovation: Does the Cryptocurrency Bitcoin Have the Potential to be a Disruptive Innovation Relative to an Existing Market. Master’s Thesis, Edinburgh Napier University. Available at: www.soc.napier.ac.uk/~cs104/mscdiss/moodlemirror/ student/d3.pdf.
  24. Newaz K.M.S., Hasanat-E-Rabbi S. and Miaji S. (2017). Spatio-temporal study of road traffic crash on a national highway of Bangladesh. In: IEEE 2017 4th International Conference Proceedings, 60-66. -- Available at: https://ieeexplore. ieee.org/document/8047743.
  25. Rogers E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press. Sassen S. (1997). Global Cities. Bologna: il Mulino.
  26. Shahzad F., Xiu G., Wang J. and Shahbaz M. (2018). An empirical investigation on the adoption of cryptocurrencies among the people of mainland China. Technology in Society, 55: 33-40.
  27. Stoll C., Klaaßen L. and Gallersdörfer U. (2019). The carbon footprint of bitcoin. Joule, 3(7): 1647-1661.
  28. Tang L., Khan Z., Zhang X., Sun F., Yang X and Li Q. (2015). A network Kernel Density Estimation for linear features in space-time analysisof big trace data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(9): 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2015.111927
  29. Tschorsch F. and Scheuermann B. (2016). Bitcoin and beyond: A technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3): 2084-2123. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2016.253571
  30. von Thünen J.H. (1826). Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Hamburg: Frederich Perthes.
  31. Valentine G., Holloway S.L. and Bingham N. (2002). The Digital Generation? Children, ICT and the Everyday Nature of Social Exclusion. Antipode, 34: 296-315.
  32. van Eck N.J., Waltman L. (2018). VOSviewer Manual – Version 1.6.8. Leiden: CWTS.
  33. Vranken H. (2017). Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 28: 1-9.
  34. Wang Y., Su Z., Ni J., Zhang N. and Shen X. (2022). Blockchain-Empowered Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(1): 160-209. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2021.313171
  35. Weber A. (1909). Über den Standort der Industrien. Tübingen: Siebeck Mohr. Zook M.A. and Blankenship J. (2018). New spaces of disruption? The failures of Bitcoin and the rhetorical power of algorithmic governance. Geoforum, 96: 248-255.
  36. Zook M., Dodge M. and Townsend A. (2004). New Digital Geographies: Information, Communication, and Place. In: Brunn S.D., Cutter S.L. and Harrington I.W., eds., Geography and Technology. Dordrecht: Springer, 155-176. Zook M. and Grote M.H. (2020). Initial coin offerings: Linking technology and financialization. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(8): 1560-1582. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X2095444
  37. Zook M. and McCanles M. (2021). Mapping the uneven geographies of digital phenomena: The case of blockchain. Canadian Geographer, 66(1): 23-36.

Stefano De Falco, Urban dimension of Crypto mines dynamics: A spatial approach. USA focus in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 139/2024, pp 115-136, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2024-139006