Does audit quality affect the probability that a female auditor has chaired the audit team? Empirical evidence from Italian public HEIs

Journal title FINANCIAL REPORTING
Author/s Alessandro Mechelli, Vincenzo Sforza, Riccardo Cimini
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/1
Language English Pages 26 P. 57-82 File size 167 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2024-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Purpose: Focusing on Italian public higher education institutions (HEIs), this study examines whether an increase in remarks in unqualified audit reports increases the likelihood that a female auditor has chaired the audit team issuing such reports. Design/methodology/approach: To answer its research question, the paper re-gresses the gender of the audit team chair with, among other factors, the number of remarks in the unqualified audit reports that are assumed to be a measure of audit quality. Findings: The results show that in Italian public HEIs, it is more probable that au-dit reports characterised by high audit quality (i.e., those with more remarks) are issued by audit teams chaired by female auditors. Originality/value: These findings contribute to existing knowledge and have im-plications for practice. They might be explained by the innate qualities of women as well as by environmental factors such as limited litigation risk characterising both the country and the sector investigated. So, they do not contradict either the Institutional Logic perspective or the Ethics of Care Theory, according to which the environment and the aptitude to manage conflict differ between men and women.

Keywords: audit reports, auditor gender, audit quality

Jel codes: M42, H83

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/189609.
  2. Alareeni, B. A. (2019). The associations between audit firm attributes and audit quality-specific indicators: A meta-analysis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(1), 6-43. DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-05-2017-1559
  3. André, P., Filip, A., & Paugam, L. (2015). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on conditional conservatism in Europe. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(3-4), 482-514.
  4. Archer, J. (1990). Gender‐stereotypic traits are derived from gender roles: A reply to McCreary. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(3), 273-277.
  5. Bepari, M. K., Mollik, A. T., Nahar, S., & Islam, M. N. (2022). Determinants of accounts level and entity level key audit matters: Further evidence. Accounting in Europe, 19(3), 1-26. DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2022.2060753
  6. Britton, D. M. (1997). Gendered organizational logic: Policy and practice in men’s and women’s prisons. Gender & Society, 11(6), 796-818. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/190150.
  7. Brizendine, L. (2006). The female brain. Morgan Road Books.
  8. Brown, P., Preiato, J., & Tarca, A. (2014). Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(1-2), 1-52.
  9. Burstein, B., Bank, L., & Jarvik, L. (1980). Sex differences in cognitive functioning: Evidence, determinants, implications. Human Development, 23(5), 289-313. DOI: 10.1159/000272593
  10. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
  11. Cohen, S., & Leventis, S. (2013). An empirical investigation of audit pricing in the public sector: The case of Greek LGOs. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(1), 74-98.
  12. Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2001). A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 190-201.
  13. Donleavy, G. D. (2008). No man’s land: Exploring the space between Gilligan and Kohlberg. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 807-822. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/25482183.
  14. Dulin, A. M. (2007). A lesson on social role theory: An example of human behavior in the social environment theory. Advances in Social Work, 8(1), 104-112.
  15. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  16. Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, December, 1380-1383. DOI: 10.1177/0146167291173011
  17. Feng, N. C. (2020). Individual auditor characteristics and audit quality: Evidence from nonprofits in the US. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(4), 551-575. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2019-0157
  18. Filip, A., Jeanjean, T., & Paugam, L. (2015). Using real activities to avoid goodwill impairment losses: Evidence and effect on future performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(3-4), 515-554.
  19. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-266). The University of Chicago Press.
  20. Gietzmann, M. B., & Quick, R. (1998). Capping auditor liability: The German experience. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(1), 81-103. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00047-5
  21. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press.
  22. Gold, A., Hunton, J. E., & Gomaa, M. I. (2009). The impact of client and auditor gender on auditors’ judgments. Accounting Horizons, 23(1), 1-18.
  23. Gomez II, M. C. P., Sacorum, R. M. A., Lipana, R. A. M., Barawid, G. L. M., & Tugas, F. C. (2020). An analysis of factors that affect audit opinions: The case of the local government units in the Metro Luzon Urban Beltway. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 30(1), 56-69.
  24. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral models. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. DOI: 10.2307/1912791
  25. Gul, A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/23525961.
  26. Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2012). Male and female auditors’ overconfidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(1), 105-118. DOI: 10.1108/02686901211186126
  27. Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2016). Do (fe)male auditors impair audit quality? Evidence from going-concern opinions. European Accounting Review, 25(1), 7-34. DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2014.921445
  28. Haynes, K. (2017). Accounting as gendering and gendered: A review of 25 years of critical accounting research on gender. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 110-124.
  29. Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.
  30. Hossain, S., Chapple, L., & Monroe, G. S. (2016). Does auditor gender affect issuing going-concern decisions for financially distressed clients? Accounting & Finance, 11, 1-35.
  31. Hottegindre, G., Loison, M., & Farjaudon, A. (2017). Male and female auditors: An ethical divide? International Journal of Auditing, 21(2), 131-149.
  32. Houghton, K. A., & Jubb, C. A. (1999). The cost of audit qualification: The role of non-audit services. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 8(2), 215-240. DOI: 10.1016/S1061-9518(99)00014-2
  33. Ibrahim, S., Noikokyris, E., Fabiano, G., & Favato, G. (2019). Manipulation of profits in Italian publicly-funded healthcare trusts. Public Money & Management, 39(6), 428-435. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1578539
  34. Ittonen, K., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). Female auditors and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 205-228.
  35. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. Oxford University Press.
  36. Kinney, W. R. (1994). Audit litigation research: Professional help is needed. Accounting Horizons, 8(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(97)00037-9.
  37. Langella, C., Anessi-Pessina, E., & Cantù, E. (2021). What are the required qualities of auditors in the public sector?. Public Money & Management, 41(6), 466-476.
  38. Legato, M. J., & Bilezikian, J. P. (Eds.). (2004). Principles of gender-specific medicine (Vol. 2). Gulf Professional Publishing.
  39. Leventis, S., & Caramanis, C. (2005). Determinants of audit time as a proxy of audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(5), 460-478.
  40. Leventis, S., Weetman, P., & Caramanis, C. (2005). Determinants of audit report lag: Some evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange. International Journal of Auditing, 9(1), 45-58.
  41. Lys, T. & Watts, R.L. (1994). Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(Supplement), 65-93.
  42. Mazzotta, R., Nardo, M. T., Pastore, P., & Vingelli, G. (2020). Board composition and gender sensitivity approach in Italian universities. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(6), 1013-1036. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-06-2019-0517
  43. Meyers-Levy, J. (1986). Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation. In: Cafferata, P. and Tybout, A.M. eds., Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books), 219-260.
  44. Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (2020). Il bilancio di genere per l’esercizio finanziario 2019. -- https://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/VERSIONE-I/attivita_istituzionali/formazione_e_gestione_del_bilancio/rendiconto/bilancio_di_genere/2019/ index.html.
  45. Mueller, G. G., Gernon, H., & Meek, G. (1994). Accounting: An international perspective. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
  46. Nicholson, J. (1984). Men and women: How different are they?. Oxford University Press.
  47. Niskanen, J., Karjalainen, J., Niskanen, M., & Karjalainen, J. (2011). Auditor gender and corporate earnings management behavior in private Finnish firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(9), 778-793. DOI: 10.1108/02686901111171448
  48. Palmrose, Z. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/2490806.
  49. Pease, A., & Pease, B. (2000). Why men don’t listen & women can’t read maps. Welcome Rain.
  50. Putrevu, S. (2001). Exploring the origins and information processing differences between men and women: Implications for advertisers. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1177/0146167291173011
  51. Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 31, 350-371. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/2984219.
  52. Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V., & Schönberger, M. W. (2015). Restricting non-audit services in Europe – The potential (lack of) impact of a blacklist and a fee cap on auditor independence and audit quality. Accounting in Europe, 12(1), 61-86. DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2015.1035290
  53. Reheul, A. M., Van Caneghem, T., Van den Bogaerd, M., & Verbruggen, S. (2017). Auditor gender, experience and reporting in nonprofit organizations. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(6), 550-577. DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-01-2016-1296
  54. Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. (1979). Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In: R. Rosenthal & B. DePaulo (Eds.). Skill in nonverbal communication (pp. 68-103). Oelgeschlager: Gunn and Hain.
  55. Siboni, B., Sangiorgi, D., Farneti, F., & de Villiers, C. (2016). Gender (in) accounting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 158-168. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-04-2016-0054
  56. Sun, J., & Liu, G. (2011). Client‐specific litigation risk and audit quality differentiation. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(4), 300-316.
  57. Sun, J., Liu, G., & Lan, G. (2011). Does female directorship on independent audit committees constrain earnings management? Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 369-382.
  58. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843. DOI: 10.1086/210361
  59. Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
  60. Vanstraelen, A. (2002). Auditor economic incentives and going-concern opinions in a limited litigious continental European business environment: Empirical evidence from Belgium. Accounting and Business Research, 32(3), 171-186. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2002.9728966
  61. Wajcman, J., & Martin, B. (2002). Narratives of identity in modern management: the corrosion of gender differences. Sociology, 36(4), 985-1002. DOI: 10.1177/003803850203600410
  62. Welsh, M. J. (1992). The construction of gender: some insights from feminist psychology. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(3), 120-132. DOI: 10.1108/09513579210017433
  63. Yang, S., Liu, Y., & Mai, Q. (2018). Is the quality of female auditors really better? Evidence based on the Chinese A-share market. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11(4), 325-350.
  64. Ye, Q. Y., & Yu, Z. B. (2011). Auditor’s personal characteristics and audit quality. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 33(2), 117-124.
  65. Zhang, Z. G., Wu, W. R., & Chen, X. Q. (2014). Research of the background characteristics of signature CPA influences audit quality: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. China Soft Science, 11, 95-104.

Alessandro Mechelli, Vincenzo Sforza, Riccardo Cimini, Does audit quality affect the probability that a female auditor has chaired the audit team? Empirical evidence from Italian public HEIs in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 1/2024, pp 57-82, DOI: 10.3280/FR2024-001004