Unpacking policy effects on the smuggling industry: a postfunctionalist examination

Journal title MONDI MIGRANTI
Author/s Nicola Montagna, Myrna Papadouka, ,Giuseppe Serrantino
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/2
Language English Pages 24 P. 61-84 File size 208 KB
DOI 10.3280/MM2024-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Evidence from different countries show that increasingly restrictive policies such as the criminalisation of migrant smuggling and the externalisation of border controls to countries of origin and transit of migratory flows, often re-sult in more sophisticated organisational structures, causing the replacement of small-scale decentralised organisations with larger hierarchical structures. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 20 professionals involved in undocu-mented migration, this study aims to assess the impacts of bilateral policy changes between 2016 and 2021 on the smuggling industry in the Mediterra-nean through a postfunctionalist theoretical perspective. The Italy-Libya Memorandum of Understanding and the EU-Turkey agreement prompted changes in migrants’ routes arriving in Greece and Italy, leading to a shift in demand for smuggling services from certain countries to others. As the find-ings suggest, the Italy-Libya agreement increased the demand for smugglers operating in Tunisia, while the EU-Turkey agreement reinforced traditional methods of unauthorised movement relying on smuggling networks.

Keywords: unintended consequences of migration policies; migration industry; smuggling networks; unauthorised migration; postfunctionalism.

  1. Garelli G. and Tazzioli M. (2018). The humanitarian war against migrant smugglers at sea. Antipode, 50, 3: 685-703;
  2. Ambrosini M. (2021). The battleground of asylum and immigration policies: a conceptual inquiry. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 44, 3: 374-395; 10.1080/01419870.2020.1836380/. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1836380/
  3. Ambrosini M. and Campomori A. (2020). Multilevel governance in trouble: the implementation of asylum seekers’ reception in Italy as a battleground. Comparative Migration Studies, 8, 22;
  4. Aziani A. (2023). The heterogeneity of human smugglers: a reflection on the use of concepts in studies on the smuggling of migrants. Trends in Organised Crime, 26: 80-106;
  5. Börzel T.A. and Risse T. (2019). Grand theories of integration and the challenges of comparative regionalism. Journal of European public policy, 26, 8: 1231-1252; DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1622589/.
  6. Boswell C. (2003). The External Dimension of EU Immigration and Asylum Policy. International Affairs, 79, 3: 619-638.
  7. Boyatzis R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.
  8. Campana P. (2018). Out of Africa: The organization of migrant smuggling across the Mediterranean European Journal of Criminology, 15, 4: 481-502; DOI: 10.1177/1477370817749179/
  9. Campana P. (2020). ‘Human Smuggling: Structure and Mechanisms’. Crime and Justice, 49, 1; DOI: 10.1086/708663/
  10. Carrera S., Radescu R., and Reslow N. (2015). EU external migration policies. A preliminary mapping of the instruments, the actors and their priorities. EURA-net project.
  11. Casaglia A. and Pacciardi A. (2022). A close look at the EU–Turkey deal: the language of border externalisation. Environment and planning C: politics and space, 40, 8: 1659-1676.
  12. Castles S. (2004a). The factors that make and unmake migration policy. International Migration Review, 38: 852-884.
  13. Castles S. (2004b). Why migration policies fail. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27: 205-227.
  14. D’Angelo A., Blitz B., Kofman E. and Montagna N. (2017). Mapping refugee reception in the Mediterranean: First report of the Evi-Med Project. Middlesex University London; www.mdx.ac.uk/evimed
  15. de Haas H. (2023). How migration really works: a factful guide to the most divisive issue in politics. London: Penguin Random House.
  16. de Haas H., Czaika M., Flahaux M.-L., Mahendra E., Natter K., Vezzoli S. and Villares-Varela M. (2019). International Migration: Trends, Determinants, and Policy Effects. Population and Development Review, 45: 885-922;
  17. European Commission. (2015). Eurobarometer 83 Spring; https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2099/.
  18. Fereday J. and Muir-Cochrane E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 1: 80-92.
  19. Gazzotti L. (2021). The “war on smugglers” and the expansion of the border apparatus. In: Gallien M. and Weigand F., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Smuggling (pp. 444-454); Routledge; DOI: 10.4324/9781003043645-32/
  20. Geddes A. (2008). Immigration and European integration. Beyond fortress Europe? Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  21. Gilgun J.F. (2019). Deductive qualitative analysis and grounded theory: Sensitizing concepts and hypothesis-testing. In Bryant A. and Charmaz K., eds., The sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 107-122). Sage.
  22. Gilgun J.F. (2015). Beyond description to interpretation and theory in qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 14, 6: 741-752; DOI: 10.1177/1473325015606513/
  23. Godin M. and Donà G. (2021). Rethinking Transit Zones: Migrant Trajectories and Transnational Networks in Techno-Borderscapes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47, 14: 3276-3292; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1804193/
  24. Golynker O. (2020). EU coordination of social security from the point of view of EU integration theory. European Journal of Social Security, 22, 2: 110-137.
  25. Gruszczak A. (2022). Internal Rebordering in the European Union: Postfunctionalism Revisited. Politics and Governance, 10, 2: 246-255;
  26. Heck G. and Hess S. (2017). Tracing the effects of the EU-Turkey Deal. Movements. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 3, 2: 35-56.
  27. Hillary L. (2021). Down the drain with General principles of EU Law? The EU-Turkey deal and ‘pseudo-authorship’. European Journal of Migration and Law, 23, 2: 127-151.
  28. Hooghe L. and Marks G. (2006). The neofunctionalists were (almost) right: Politicization and European integration. In: Crouch C and. Streeck W., eds., The diversity of democracy: A tribute to Philippe C. Schmitter (pp. 205-222). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.
  29. Hooghe L. and Marks G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 1: 1-23.
  30. Hooghe L. and Marks G. (2019). Grand theories of European integration in the twenty-first century. Journal of European Public Policy, 26, 8, 1113-1133; DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711/
  31. Hooghe L. and Marks G. (2018). Introduction to theory meets crisis collection. Journal of European Public Policy, 25, 1: 1-6.
  32. Hyde K.F. (2000). Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research. Qualitative market research: An international journal, 3, 2: 82-90.
  33. Idriz N. (2017). The EU-Turkey Deal in front of the Court of Justice of the EU: An unsolicited Amicus Brief. TMC Asser Institute for International & European Law, Policy Brief, 3.
  34. İçduygu A (2020). Decentring migrant smuggling: reflections on the Eastern Mediterranean route to Europe. J Ethn Migr Stud: 1-17; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1804194/
  35. Karamandidou L. and Kasparek B. (2022). From Exception to Extra-Legal Normality: Pushbacks and Racist State Violence against People Crossing the Greek-Turkish Land Border. State Crime J., 11, 12.
  36. Kasparek B. (2016). Complementing Schengen: The Dublin system and the European border and migration regime. In: Migration policy and practice: Interventions and solutions (pp. 59-78). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
  37. Kriesi H., Altiparmakis A., Bojár Á. and Oană I.-E. (2024). Dynamics of Policymaking in the EU-Turkey Agreement. In: Coming to Terms with the European Refugee Crisis (pp. 275-296). Cambridge University Press.
  38. Koros D. (2021). The Normalization of Pushbacks in Greece: Biopolitics and Racist State Crime. State Crime Journal, 10, 2: 238-256.
  39. Leanne W. and Grewcock M. (2012). Criminalizing people smuggling: Preventing or globalizing harm?. In: Routledge Handbook of Transnational Organized Crime (pp. 379-390). Abingdon: Routledge.
  40. Lehner R. (2019). The EU‐Turkey‐deal: Legal challenges and pitfalls. International Migration, 57, 2: 176-185.
  41. Leuffen D. Rittberger B. and Schimmelfennig F. (2022). Postfunctionalism. Integration and Differentiation in the European Union. Theory and Policies: 143-168.
  42. Liguori A. (2017). The 2017 Italy-Libya memorandum and its consequences. In: Migration in the Mediterranean area and the challenges for “hosting” European society (pp. 215-226). Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
  43. Malk B.Y. (2016). Human trafficking and human smuggling to and from Eastern Sudan: Intended and unintended consequences of States’ policies. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5, 1: 215;
  44. Martin P.L. and Taylor E. (2001). Managing migration: the role of economic policies’. In: Zolberg A.R. and Benda P.M., eds., Global Migrants, Global Refugees: Problems and Solutions (pp. 95-120). New York and Oxford: Berghahn
  45. Miller R. and Baumeister S. (2013). Managing Migration: Is border control fundamental to anti-trafficking and anti-smuggling interventions? Anti-Trafficking Review, 2: 15-32.
  46. Nakache D. and Losier J. (2017). The European Union Immigration Agreement with Libya: Out of Sight, Out of Mind?. E-International Relations, 25.
  47. Perkowski N. and Squire V. (2019). The anti-policy of European anti-smuggling as a site of contestation in the Mediterranean migration ‘crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45, 12: 2167-2184.
  48. Pew Research Center (2016). Europeans fear wave of refugees will mean more terrorism, fewer jobs (public opinion survey), 11 July; https://www.pewglobal.org/ 2016/07/11/europeans-fear-wave-of-refugees-will-mean-more-terrorism-fewer-jobs/.
  49. Raineri L. (2021). Migrant smuggling and the social organisation of cross-border mobility. In: The Routledge Handbook of Smuggling (pp. 313-325). Abingdon: Routledge.
  50. Rauh C. (2020). Between neo-functionalist optimism and post-functionalist pessimism: Integrating politicisation into integration theory. In: Theorising the crises of the European Union (pp. 119-137). Abingdon: Routledge.
  51. Reitano T. and Micallef M. (2016). Breathing space-the impact of the EU-Turkey deal on irregular migration. Institute for Security Studies Papers, 297: 1-24.
  52. Sanchez G. (2015) Human smuggling facilitators in the US Southwest. In: Pickering S. and Ham J., eds., Human Smuggling Facilitators in the US Southwest. Abingdon: Routledge;
  53. Schmeidl S. (2001). Conflict and forced migration: a quantitative review, 1964-1995. S Schmeidl. In: Zolberg A.R. and Benda P.M., eds., Global migrants, global refugees: Problems and solutions (pp. 62-94). New York and Oxford: Berghahn;
  54. Schmitter P.C. (2009). On the way to a post‐functionalist theory of European integration. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 1: 211-215.
  55. Schuberth M. (2015). A transformation from political to criminal violence? Politics, organised crime and the shifting functions of Haiti's urban armed groups. Conflict, Security & Development, 15, 2: 169-196.
  56. Stivas D. (2023). Greece’s response to the European refugee crisis: A tale of two securitizations. Mediterranean Politics, 28, 1: 49-72.
  57. Stratoudaki H. (2024). At the Gates: Borders, National Identity, and Social Media During the ‘Evros Incident’. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 39, 1: 111-129.
  58. Tekin B.Ç. (2022). Bordering through othering: On strategic ambiguity in the making of the EU-Turkey refugee deal. Political Geography, 98;
  59. Tjønn M.H. and Jumbert M.G. (2024). Migration Across the Mediterranean: Shaping Italy-Libya Relations Over Time. In: Zapata-Barrero R. and Awad I., eds., Migrations in the Mediterranean. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer; DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-42264-5_4:53-69
  60. Van Liempt I. (2007). Navigating borders: Inside perspectives on the process of human smuggling into the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  61. Vrânceanu A., Dinas E., Heidland T. and Ruhs M. (2023). The European refugee crisis and public support for the externalisation of migration management. European Journal of Political Research, 62, 4: 1146-1167.
  62. Webber D. (2019). Trends in European political (dis) integration. An analysis of postfunctionalist and other explanations. Journal of European Public Policy, 26, 8: 1134-1152.
  63. Weber B. (2017). The EU-Turkey refugee deal and the not quite closed Balkan route. Sarajevo: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung; https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sarajevo/13436.pdf/.
  64. Weber L. and Grewcock M. (2011). Criminalising People Smuggling: Preventing or globalizing harm? In: Allum F. and Gilmour S., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Transnational Organized Crime (pp. 379-390). London: Routledge.

Nicola Montagna, Myrna Papadouka, ,Giuseppe Serrantino, Unpacking policy effects on the smuggling industry: a postfunctionalist examination in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 2/2024, pp 61-84, DOI: 10.3280/MM2024-002003