Psychic retreats and political refugees

Journal title SETTING
Author/s Federico Brundo
Publishing Year 2026 Issue 2025/49
Language Italian Pages 13 P. 89-101 File size 113 KB
DOI 10.3280/SET2025-049008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The concept of the “refuge of the mind,” developed by John Steiner, describes a defensive intrapsychic space used to prevent mental fragmentation, where the individual retreats to avoid anxiety, guilt, and vulnerability. When the refuge becomes indispensable and rigid, it becomes pathological, hindering emotional progress. Based on Melanie Klein’s theory, Steiner argues that the mental refuge forms to prevent the transition from the paranoid -schizoid position to the depressive position, keeping the individual in an illusion of safety. Although useful as temporary protection, the refuge hinders growth, preventing the processing of internal conflicts and the possibility of establishing authentic relationships. In cases of severe psychopathology, the separation between the inside and outside of the refuge is stark, with the individual retreating in a pervasive and rigid manner. Similarly, refugee migrants are welcomed into our country to receive international protection. These two forms of protection are structured around the fragility experienced. In the first case, intrapsychic fragility; in the second, external, real fragility. The two levels of vulnerability present similarities and differences that imply unexpected consequences. When the migrant is an adolescent, the analysis of the tension between perceived fragility and the force toward which the young person is drawn becomes even more complex.

Keywords: Mental refuge, international protection, unaccompanied foreign minors, adolescence

  1. Convenzione di Ginevra (1951-67).
  2. Deutsch H. (1942). Some Forms of Emotional Desturbance and their Relationship to Schizofrenia, in Deutsch (1965). Masina L., Personalità “come se”, SPIweb – Società Psicoanalitica Italiana (2015).
  3. Klein M. (1952). Some Theoretical Conclusions Regarding the Emotional Life of the Infant [Trad. It. Alcune conclusion i teoriche sulla vita del bambino nella prima infanzia, in Klein 1921-1958)].
  4. Rey J.H. (1975). Liberté et processus de pensée psychotique. Vie méd. Can fr., 4: 1046-60.
  5. Sayad A. (2002). La doppia assenza. Dalle illusioni dell’emigrato alle sofferenze dell’immigrato. Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  6. Segal H. (1972). A delusional systems as a defence against the Re-Emergence of a Catastrofic Situation. Int J. Psycho-Anal., 53: 393-401.
  7. Steiner J. (1996). I rifugi della mente.
  8. Winnicott D.W. (1953). Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena: a Study of the First Non-Me Possession [trad. It., Oggetti transizionali e fenomeni transizionali, in Winnicott (1958)].

Federico Brundo, Rifugi della mente e rifugiati politici in "SETTING" 49/2025, pp 89-101, DOI: 10.3280/SET2025-049008