Metropolitan cities and metroregions: development engines? A comparison between urban systems pre- and post-crisis

Journal title RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA
Author/s Marco Bagliani, Paolo Feletig, Fiorenzo Ferlaino, Francesca Silvia Rota
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/2 Language Italian
Pages 23 P. 5-27 File size 306 KB
DOI 10.3280/RGI2020-002001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The contribution develops a reflection on the ability of Italian metroregions, and Metropolitan cities namely, to be efficient in terms of competitiveness and reaction to the global economic crisis. To do this, a dynamic-cumulative shift-share analysis of the employment levels of the Italian urban system in the pre- and post-crisis period is carried out. Compared to the usual techniques of comparative analysis, this method allows to detect the dynamics of development of the territories and to decompose the constituent components of the competitive advantage, both internal (for example due to the composition of the regional economy) and external (the Nation-state effect). Therefore, in the perspective of the regional sciences it offers a more precise assessment of the local territorial potential.

Keywords: Territorial competitiveness, shift-share, Italian Metropolitan cities

  1. EUROSTAT (2013). EUROSTAT regional yearbook 2013. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  2. Esteban-Marquillas J.M. (1972). A reinterpretation of shift-share analysis. Regional and Urban Economics, 2, n. 3: 249-261.
  3. Amin A. e Thrift N., eds. (1994). Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 79-81. DOI: 10.1177/09697764960030010
  4. ANCI (2016). Il libro bianco sulle Città metropolitane. Roma: ANCI.
  5. Antonietti R., Coro G. e Gambarotto F., a cura di (2015). Uscire dalla crisi. Città, comunità, specializzazioni intelligenti. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  6. Aumayr C.M. (2007). European Region Types in EU-25. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 4, 2: 109-147.
  7. Bagliani M., Feletig P., Ferlaino F. e Rota F.S. (2019). Proposta di analisi shift-share dinamico-cumulativa al caso dell’occupazione delle metroregioni italiane (2000-2014).
  8. In: Lattarulo P., Omizzolo A., Palermo F., Provenzano V. e Streifeneder T., a cura di, Le regioni d’Europa tra identità locali, nuove comunità e disparità territoriali. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 119-142.
  9. Barff R. e Knight P. (1988). Dynamic Shift-Share Analysis. Growth and Change, 19, 2: 2-10.
  10. Bbsr , ed. (2011). Metropolitan areas in Europe. BBSR-Online-Publikation No. 1/2011. Becker G., Glaeser E. e Murphy K. (1999). Population and economic growth. American Economic Review, 89: 145-149.
  11. Brunet R., ed. (1989). Les villes Europeénnes. Rapporto per la DATAR, Delegation a l’Amenagement du Territoire et a la Action Regionale. Paris: La Documentation Francaise.
  12. Camagni R., Capello R. e Caragliu A. (2015). The Rise of Second-Rank Cities: What Role for Agglomeration Economies? European Planning Studies: 1069-89. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2014.90499
  13. Capello R., Caragliu A. e Fratesi U. (2015). Spatial heterogeneity in the costs of the economic crisis in Europe: are cities sources of regional resilience? Journal of Economic Geography, 15: 951-972. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu053
  14. Cappellin R., Ferlaino F. e Rizzi P., a cura di (2012). La città nell’economia della conoscenza. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  15. Caragliu A. e Del Bo C. (2018). The Economics of Smart City Policies. Scienze Regionali -Italian Journal of Regional Science, 1/2018: 81-104. DOI: 10.14650/8881
  16. Ce-Commissione europea (1999). Schema di Sviluppo dello Spazio Europeo. Bruxelles-Lussemburgo: CEE.
  17. Cheshire P.C. e Hay D.G. (1989). Urban problems in Western Europe. An economic analysis. London: Unwin & Hyman.
  18. Cooke P., ed. (1995). The rise of the Rustbelt. London: University College London Press.
  19. Dematteis G. e Ferlaino F. (1991). Le aree metropolitane tra specificità e complementarietà. Il caso italiano alla luce della Legge 142/1990. Torino: IRES Piemonte. Detterbeck K. e Hepburn E. (2018). Statewide parties in Western and Eastern Europe: territorial patterns of party organizations. In: Detterbeck K. e Hepburn E., eds., Handbook of Territorial Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 120-138.
  20. Dunn E.S. Jr. (1960). A Statistical and Analytical Technique for Regional Analysis. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 6: 98-112.
  21. Espa G., Filipponi D., Giuliani D. e Piacentino D. (2013). Decomposing regional business change at plant level in Italy: A novel spatial shift-share approach. Papers in Regional Science, 93.
  22. ESPON (2013). Making Europe Open and Polycentric. Vision and Scenarios for the European Territory towards 2050. ESPON.
  23. Ferlaino F. e Rota F.S. (2017a). La competitivita delle Citta metropolitane italiane nel contesto europeo. In: Cappellin R. et al., a cura di, Investimenti, innovazione e nuove strategie di impresa. Quale ruolo per la nuova politica industriale e regionale?, Milano: Egea, 301-316.
  24. Id., Ead. (2017b). Oltre la crisi: il ruolo delle citta metropolitane. In: Dansero E., Lucia M.G., Rossi U. e Toldo A., a cura di, (S)radicamenti, Societa di studi geografici. Memorie geografiche, 15: 17-26. Gabe T.M. (2006). Growth of Creative Occupations in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: A Shift‐Share Analysis. Growth and Change, 37, 3: 396-415.
  25. Houston D.B. (1967). The shift and share analysis of regional growth: a critique. Southern Economic Journal, 33, 4: 577-581.
  26. Ietri D. (2018). La competitivita delle citta di piccole e media dimensione e il riordino territoriale. Casi studio europei in aree trasfrontaliere. Geotema, n. 57: 25-31.
  27. Ispra (2017). Le citta metropolitane, in Qualità dell’ambiente urbano. XIII Rapporto.
  28. Roma: Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale.
  29. Istat (2015). La nuova geografia dei sistemi locali. Roma: Istat-Stealth.
  30. Jessop R.D. (2005). The future of the state in an era of globalization. In: Faller A. e Lerch M., eds., Challenges of globalization: new trends in international politics and society. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 13-26.
  31. Kresl P.E. e Ietri D. (2016). Smaller Cities in a World of Competitiveness. Londra-New York: Routledge.
  32. Krishnamoorthy B. e D’Lima C. (2014). Benchmarking as a measure of competitiveness. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 4, 3: 342-359. -- https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2014.063240
  33. Krugman P. (1993). On the number and location of cities. European Economic Review, 37: 293-298. -- https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(93)90017-5
  34. Kunzmann K.R. e Wegener M. (1991). The Pattern of Urbanization in Western Europe 1960-1990. Report for the Directorate General XVI of the Commission of the European Communities. Dortmund: Instituts fur Raumplanung-IRPUD, Vol. 26.
  35. Landesmann M. e Romisch R. (2006). Economic Growth, Regional Disparities and Employment in the EU-27. WIIW Research Reports Nr. 333, Vienna.
  36. Moonen T. e Clark G. (2013). The Business of Cities 2013. What do 150 city indexes and benchmarking studies tell us about the urban world in 2013? Chicago: Jones Lang LaSalle.
  37. Oecd (2012). Redefining “Urban”: A new way to measure metropolitan areas. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  38. Pan W., Ghoshal G., Krumme C., Cebrian M. e Pentland A. (2013). Urban characteristics attributable to density-driven tie formation. Nature Communications, 4: 1-7.
  39. Rosenfeld F. (1959). Commentaire a l’expose de M. Dunn. Economie Appliquée, 4: 531-534.
  40. Rota F.S. e Vanolo A. (2006). A critical approach to benchmarking in urban studies. Paper presented at the ‘Urban Conditions and Life Chances’ Conference, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
  41. SGI-Societa Geografica Italiana (2008). Rapporto 2008. L’Italia delle città. Tra malessere e trasfigurazione. Roma: Societa Geografica Italiana.
  42. SPS-Sistema permanente dei servizi (1990). 7° Rapporto sullo stato dei poteri locali. Roma: SPS.
  43. Urban@it-Centro nazionale di studi per le politiche urbane (2016). Rapporto sulle città. Metropoli attraverso la crisi. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Marco Bagliani, Paolo Feletig, Fiorenzo Ferlaino, Francesca Silvia Rota, Città metropolitane e metroregioni: motori per lo sviluppo? Confronto tra i sistemi urbani italiani pre- e post-crisi in "RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA" 2/2020, pp 5-27, DOI: 10.3280/RGI2020-002001