The Relevance of Rewards in Performance- Based Management Control

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Vilma Kilpinen, Jean Claude Mutiganda, Matti Skoog
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/2 Suppl.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 13 P. 15-27 Dimensione file 185 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2024-002-S1002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This study aims to increase the understanding of how employees in different or-ganizational contexts and hierarchical levels explain and appreciate, i.e. under-stand, their organisation’s reward systems. Two different schools of thought have dominated the debate of how to conceptualize the role of rewards in performance management and organisation psychology literature: agency theory and self-determination theory. This study combines these schools and take both monetary aspects into account in line with what is prescribed in agency theory and more non-financial aspects that self-determination consider. The study applies a case study approach based on interviews and publicly available information from five Finnish organisations. The organisations analysed operate in different sectors, have different organisational structures, and use different reward systems. From a careful investigation of the five different organisations, a cross-sectional picture emerges showing the role of reward systems in companies, and their perceived importance as management control tools. The findings show that reward transpar-ency and fair communication are the most significant factors affecting the experi-ence of employees towards performance-based management control system that is used to allocate rewards. Monetary rewards should also be complemented and linked with social non-financial rewards to reach the decent management control acceptance and understanding in the organisation.

Keywords:Management control, rewards, agency and self-determination

  1. Agrawal C. (2012), Performance-Related Pay-Hype Versus Reality: With Special Reference to Public Sector Organizations, Management and Labour Studies 37(4), pp. 337-344.
  2. Ariani D.W. (2023), Relationship Model of Compensation, Motivation, Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance, International Review of Management and Marketing 13(4), pp. 9-13.
  3. Bosse D.A., Phillips R.A. (2016), Agency Theory and Bounded Self-Interest, Academy of Management Review 41(2), pp. 276-297.
  4. Celik H., Nowicki D.R., Uvet H., Adana S., Cevikparmak S. (2023), Supplier Goal Commitment in Performance-Based Contracts: The lens of Goal-Setting Theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 53(10), pp. 1158-1186.
  5. Chatzoglou P.D., Diamantidis A.D., Karras A. (2024), Unveiling Employee Motivating Factors During Economic Crisis Periods: A Structural Approach, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
  6. Dagher J., Boustani N.M., Khneyzer C. (2024), Unlocking HRM Challenges: Exploring Motivation and Job Satisfaction within Military Service (Laf), Administrative Sciences, 14(4).
  7. Larsson B., Ulfsdotter Eriksson Y., Adolfsson P. (2022), Motivating and Demotivating Effects of Performance-Related Pay in Swedish Public Sector Organizations, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(3), pp. 444-463.
  8. Lee J. H. (2024), Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Organizational Commitment: Role of Personal Motive and Ability, International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior 27(2), pp. 139-160.
  9. Leroy H. (2024), Motivating People to Work: The Value Behind Diverse Assumptions, Journal of Management Studies, Ahead of print (n/a).
  10. Malek S. L., Sarin S., and Haon C. (2020), Extrinsic Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and New Product Development Performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(6), pp. 528-551.
  11. Meirinhos G., Cardoso A., Neves M., Silva R., and Rêgo R. (2023), Leadership Styles, Motivation, Communication and Reward Systems in Business Performance, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(2).
  12. Patel C., Ahmad Husairi M., Haon C., Oberoi P. (2023), Monetary Rewards and Self-Selection in Design Crowdsourcing Contests: Managing Participation, Contribution Appropriateness, and Winning Trade-Offs, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191.
  13. Rixom B.A., Rixom J.M. (2023), Strive for Rewards or Keep Them Accountable? Motivating Employees’ Effort and Performance. Journal of General Management.
  14. Shaw J.D. (2024), A Cautionary Tale: On the Adoption of Self-Determination Theory Principles for Practice, Journal of Management Studies.
  15. Shortland S., Perkins S.J. (2023), Quantum Accountability: When does Enough Become Too Much In top Pay Decision-Making?, Employee Relations, 45(6), pp. 1455-1475.
  16. Siswanto S., Maulidiyah Z., Masyhuri M. (2021), Employee Engagement and Motivation as Mediators between the Linkage of Reward with Employee Performance, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), pp. 625-633.
  17. Torfing J., Bentzen T.Ø. (2020), Does Stewardship Theory Provide a Viable Alternative to Control-Fixated Performance Management?, Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 86.
  18. Yin R.K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: SAGE Publications.
  19. Zhang Y.,W. He, Long L., Zhang J. (2022), Does Pay for Individual Performance Truly Undermine Employee Creativity? The Different Moderating Roles of Vertical and Horizontal Collectivist Orientations, Human Resource Management, 61(1), pp. 21-38.

Vilma Kilpinen, Jean Claude Mutiganda, Matti Skoog, The Relevance of Rewards in Performance- Based Management Control in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2 Suppl./2024, pp 15-27, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2024-002-S1002