The evolution of labour market institutions in Europe and Asia: A focus on Italy, Singapore and Korea

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA PUBBLICA
Autori/Curatori Germana Bottone
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/3
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 21 P. 355-375 Dimensione file 220 KB
DOI 10.3280/EP2024-003001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The impact of institutional change upon the labour market is a topic hugely discussed in the literature. This paper investigates the evolution of labour market institutions in Italy, Singapore, and Korea to underline common features and differences. The three countries differ enormously for geographical and historical reasons and are located in two very unlike continent, Europe and Asia. Nevertheless, beyond geographical, historical and economic dissimilarities, Italy, Singapore and Korea show some common trend in their labour markets: an increase in precariousness and a drop in welfare provisions, as a consequence of the liberal reforms. In Europe, the failure of the welfare system brought about a change of direction towards workfare programs. In Asia, the industrial factory of the world, low-cost workers attract foreign investments, therefore, the weak segments of society, such as women, low skilled, migrants and young people found difficult to sign standard employment contracts. The comparative policy analysis aims at showing that a consensus on the mainstream economic thought supported by the international organisations (and stakeholders) has driven the evolution of labour market institutions in both Europe and Asia. Labour market deregulation has been depicted as a panacea, even if it was not the specific need of a given context. In addition, the comparative policy analysis is helpful to know and deepen the “best practices” adopted all over the world, in order to develop and implement mission-oriented public policies in the European labour market.

Keywords:globalisation, labour market, deregulation, social dumping.

Jel codes:H52, F66, J08

  1. Baek J. and Park W. (2018). Firms’ Adjustments to Employment Protection Legislation: Evidence From South Korea. ILR Review, May, 71(3): 733-759. DOI: 10.1177/0019793917728720
  2. Boeri T. & Ours J. Van (2013). The economics of imperfect labour markets. Princeton University Press.
  3. Bottone G. (2017). Is full employment still possible in the coming age of robots? Whether or not, which institutional context may challenge this technological revolution?, paper presented at the ASTRIL international conference: reassessment and perspectives of labour policies 14/15 December 2017.
  4. Bottone G. (2020). The effect of globalisation on labour market institutions in Europe, Is there a significant deregulation? What are its effects?, ASTRIL Working Paper – online 52/2020.
  5. Chuanfei C. (2019). Precarious Work and its Complicit Network: Migrant Labour in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(4): 528-551. DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2019.1572209
  6. Cooke F. L. and Jiang Y. (2017). The growth of non-standard employment in Japan and South Korea: the role of institutional actors and impact on workers and the labour market. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55. 155-176. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7941.12138
  7. Department of Statistics Singapore (2013). Yearbook of Statistics Singapore 2013.
  8. Singapore Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade & Industry.
  9. Deepak N. (2019). Resurgent Asia, Diversity in Development, A study prepared by the United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), OUP.
  10. European Commission (2013). “Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan: Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe”. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  11. European Commission (2016). “Labour Market and Wage Developments in Europe”. Annual Review, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Directorate A.
  12. Fillinger T. et al. (2017). Labour protection for the vulnerable, an evaluation of the salary and injury claims system for migrant workers in Singapore. Research Collection School of Social Sciences, 2217.
  13. Gebel M. and Giesecke J. (2016). Does Deregulation Help? The Impact of Employment Protection Reforms on Youths’ Unemployment and Temporary Employment Risks in Europe. European Sociological Review, 32(4): 486-500.
  14. Grubb D. B., Lee J.-K., and Tergeist P. (2007). Addressing labour market duality in Korea. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, n. 61, DOI: 10.1787/1815199X
  15. ILO (2010). “ILO Study Mission on Singapore’s Tripartism Framework”. Singapore, 18 to 22 January 2010.
  16. ILO (2018). “Bangkok Asia-Pacific Employment and Social Outlook 2018. Advancing decent work for sustainable development”. Regional Economic and Social Analysis Unit.
  17. Yoo G. and Kang C. (2012). The effect of protection of temporary workers on employment levels: evidence from the 2007 reform of South Korea. ILR Review, 65(3), July, Cornell University. DOI: 10.1177/001979391206500305
  18. Kalleberg A. L. and Hewison K. (2013). Precarious Work and the Challenge for Asia. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3): 271-288. DOI: 10.1177/0002764212466238
  19. Le Queux S. and Kuah A.T.H. (2020). 君子 Junzi Leadership in Singapore: Governance and Human Capital Development. Journal of Management Development, March, DOI: 10.1108/JMD-05-2019-0194
  20. Manning A. (2011). Imperfect competition in the labor market. In: O. Ashenfelter &
  21. D. Card (eds.). Handbook of labour economics. North-Holland, pp. 973-1041, Volume 4, Part B. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02409-9
  22. Manpower Research and Statistics Department (2010). Singapore Workforce, 2010. Meera R. (2019). From Third World to First: A Case Study of Labour Laws in a
  23. Changing Singapore. Labour Law Journal, 70(1): 42, March.
  24. OECD (2016). OECD employment outlook 2016. Paris: OECD. DOI: 10.1787/19991266
  25. Peng I. (2012). Dualisation in Japan and South Korea. In: Emmennegger P., Hausermann S., Palier B. and Seeleib-Jauser M. The age of dualization: the changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies, pp. 1-24, USA: International Policy Exchange Series, Oxford University Press.
  26. Piazza G. and Myant M. (2016). Italy’s labour market reforms of 2012: did they reduce unemployment?. ETUI Research Paper 2015.11, Brussels, ETUI.
  27. Rodrik D. (2006). Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4): 973-987.
  28. Sungteak K. (2010). The Worker Dispatch System of Korea: Status and Challenges. e-Labour News, 106, Issue paper (Paper presented at the 8th Northeast Asia Labour Forum held in Seoul on October 28).
  29. Walker B. (2011). How does non-standard employment affect workers? A consideration of the evidence. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 36(3): 1429.
  30. Westerhuis G. and Henrekson M. (2016). The Institutional Evolution of Labour Market Institutions in Europe and Entrepreneurship. Policy Brief, D2.5/July, submitted to the European Commission as part of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 649378, Utrecht and Stockholm: Financial and Institutional Reforms for an Entrepreneurial Society (FIRES).
  31. World Bank (2005). Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  32. Yuste A. R., Foden D. and Vogel L. (1996). Globalisation, deregulation and employment a contribution to the debate, DWP 96.08.2 (E).

Germana Bottone, The evolution of labour market institutions in Europe and Asia: A focus on Italy, Singapore and Korea in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 3/2024, pp 355-375, DOI: 10.3280/EP2024-003001