Further thoughts on recovery

Author/s Barbara D'Avanzo
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/2 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. 167-181 File size 154 KB
DOI 10.3280/RSF2015-002011
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Recovery as a paradigm is endorsed and appreciated by some and disputed by others. The source of divergences derives from the vastness and complexity of the term and the profound changes this notion has brought about in mental health services and knowledge. The author, in order to enhance a deeper understanding, highlights some of the different facets of recovery: i.e. the relationship between symptomatic and functional recovery; the reconstruction of the Self as a personal inner journey through a narrative development in which client and health professional collaborate to recompose the connections between life, illness and recovery; the restoration of the person’s social relationships - in the renewed understanding of psychosocial rehabilitation, in line with the principles of deinstitutionalisation, that comprises housing, employment and the effort to counteract the social drift looming over the young people presenting early signs of mental illness; the mental health services’ capacity to put into practice new approaches in risk management which include the risks of restricting the client’s personal freedom or of hampering recovery opportunities.

Keywords: Recovery, narrative development, awareness, housing, vocational reintegration, risk management

  1. Estroff SE. Self, identity, and subjective experiences in schizophrenia: in search of the subject. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1989; 15(2):189-196.
  2. Strauss J. Subjective experiences of schizophrenia: toward a new dynamic psychiatry – ii. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1989; 15:179-187.
  3. Sternai E. Aspetti della soggettività nella psicosi. Lettera 1995; XX:1-96.
  4. Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. British Journal of Psychiatry 2011; 199(6): 445-452.
  5. Marin I, Bon S. Guarire si può. Persone e disturbo mentale. Merano: Edizioni alphabeta Verlag; 2012.
  6. Law H, Morrison AP. Recovery in psychosis: a Delphi study with experts by experience. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2014; 40(6):1347-55.
  7. Roe D, Kravetz S. Different ways of being aware of a psychiatric disability: a multifunctional narrative approach to insight into mental disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2003; 191:417-424.
  8. Roe D, Yanos PT. Psychoeducation for people with psychotic symptoms: Moving beyond information and towards inspiration. Behavioral Therapist 2006; 29: 53-56.
  9. Lysaker PH, Dimaggio G, Buck KD, Callaway SS, Salvatore G, Carcione A, Nicolò G, Stanghellini G. Poor insight in schizophrenia: links between different forms of metacognition with awareness of symptoms, treatment need, and consequences of illness. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2011; 52(3):253-60.
  10. Williams CC, Collins AA. Defining new frameworks for psychosocial interventions. Psychiatry, Interpersonal & Biological Processes 1999; 62: 61-78.
  11. Lysaker PH, Vergo JM. Il ruolo dell’insight nel processo di recovery dalla schizofrenia. Analisi di tre punti di vista. In: Maone A, D’Avanzo B, ed. Recovery. Nuovi paradigmi per la salute mentale. Milano: Cortina Editore; 2015.
  12. Andresen R, Oades L, Caputi P. The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: towards an empirically validated stage model. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 37:586–594. Bourdeau G, Lecomte T, Lysaker PH. Stages of recovery in early psychosis: Associations with symptoms, function, and narrative development. Psychology and Psychotherapy 2014; Aug 19. DOI: 10.1111/papt.12038
  13. Aaltonen J, SeikkulaJ, Lehtinen K. The comprehensive Open-Dialogue approach in Western Lapland: I. The incidence of non-affective psychosis and prodromal states. Psychosis 2011; 3(3):179-191.
  14. Rossi E. Ricerca e pratiche innovative nei servizi di salute mentale: il recovery movement. Sistema Salute 2012; 56(2): 234-244.
  15. Boevink W. La vita oltre la psichiatria. In: Maone A, D’Avanzo B, ed. Recovery. Nuovi paradigmi per la salute mentale. Milano: Cortina Editore; 2015.
  16. Wunderink L, Nieboer RM, Wiersma D, Sytema S, Nienhuis FJ. Recovery in remitted first-episode psychosis at 7 years of follow-up of an early dose reduction/discontinuation or maintenance treatment strategy: Long-term followup of a 2-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70: 913-920.
  17. McGorry P, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Killackey E. AntipsychoticMedication During the Critical Period Following Remission From First-Episode Psychosis. Less Is More. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70(9):898-899.
  18. Menezes N, Malla AM, Norman RM, Archie S, Roy P, Zipursky RB. A multisite Canadian perspective: examining the functional outcome from first-episode psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2009; 120:138–146.
  19. Law H, Morrison AP. Recovery in psychosis: a Delphi study with experts by experience. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2014; 40(6):1347-55.
  20. Hawley CJ, Littlechild B, Sivakumaran T, et al. Structure and content of risk assessment proformas in mental healthcare. Journal of Mental Health 2006; 15: 437-448.
  21. Tickle A, Brown D, Hayward M. Can we risk recovery? A grounded theory of clinical psychologists’ perceptions of risk and recovery-oriented mental health services. Psychology and Psychotherapy 2014; 87(1):96-110.
  22. Sykes MJ, Brabban A, Reilly J. Balancing harm in support of recovery. Journal of Mental Health, epub 30 Jan 2015.
  23. Henderson C, Flood C, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Sutherby K, Szmukler G. Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: Single blind randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 2004; 329:136-140.
  24. Thornicroft G, Farrelly S, Szmukler G, Birchwood M, Waheed W, Flach C, Barrett B, Byford S, Henderson C, Sutherby K, Lester H, Rose D, Dunn G, Leese M, Marshall M. Clinical outcomes of Joint Crisis Plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2013;
  25. 381: 1634-1641.
  26. Mental Health “Recovery” Study Working Group. Mental health “Recovery”: users and refusers. Toronto: Wellesley Institute; 2009.
  27. Priebe S, Badesconyi A, Fioritti A, Hansson L, Kilian R, Torres-Gonzales F, Turner T, Wiersma D. Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: Comparison of data on service provision from six European countries. British Medical Journal 2005; 330:123-126. D’Avanzo B, Barbato A. Ricognizione dei dati e degli studi italiani: quale modello di struttura residenziale, all’interno di quale sistema? Congresso Nazionale SIEP Politiche per la salute mentale e buone pratiche. Etica, evidenze, esperienze. Trieste; 2014.
  28. Chow WS, Priebe S. Understanding psychiatric institutionalization: a conceptual review. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:169.
  29. Fioritti A, Maone A. La riabilitazione psichiatrica orientata alla recovery. Lavoro e vita indipendente. In: Maone A, D’Avanzo B, ed. Recovery. Nuovi paradigmi per la salute mentale. Milano: Cortina Editore; 2015.
  30. Drake RE, Bond GR, Becker DR. Individual placement and support: an evidencebased approach to supported employment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. Gosha R. Lo Strengths model. In: In: Maone A, D’Avanzo B, ed. Recovery. Nuovi paradigmi per la salute mentale. Milano: Cortina Editore; 2015.
  31. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Supported Education: The Evidence. HHS Pub. No. SMA-11-4654, Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.

Barbara D'Avanzo, L’idea di recovery: spunti per proseguire nella riflessione in "RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA" 2/2015, pp 167-181, DOI: 10.3280/RSF2015-002011