Migliorare la salute delle donne nei luoghi di lavoro: aspetti normativi e gestione dei rischi. Una ricerca in Toscana

Journal title STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
Author/s Silvia Cervia, Rita Biancheri
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/1 Language Italian
Pages 29 P. 44-72 File size 279 KB
DOI 10.3280/SO2015-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

With the Occupational Health and Safety Act (Legislative Decree 81/2008) Italy recognizes the gender as a relevant factor to ensure the equal protection for men and women at work. While introducing this important innovation, the text of the decree does not provide any useful definitions for operationalizing the concept of gender in the context of the promotion of health and safety at work. The paper aims to provide consistent definitions of the key concepts of health and gender, which are placed within a common framework defined by the contextual approach. From this point of view the gender perspective allows to consider how the social construction of gendered roles represents an important element both in the definition of the constraints and resources of the context, and in defining the possibility of response at the individual level. The second part of the paper presents the first results of the research carried out, at macro level, in Tuscany by analyzing secondary data on labor market in connection with those concerning accident at work. The analysis, despite critical issue due to the use of database born for insurance, highlights the need to proceed in more in-depth analysis considering, more and more, in an integrated way these two aspects. To do this it is necessary, as the paper highlight, to act on the data storage system.

Keywords: Gender, Health, contextual approach, Safety at Work, Differences, Inequality

  1. Booth, A.L., Nolen, P.J. (2012), “Gender differences in risk behavior: does nurture matter?”, The Economic Journal, 122(558): 56-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02480.x
  2. Foddis, R., Ficini, G. (2014), “Differenze di genere, Salute e Sicurezza sul Lavoro: tra norme ed evidenze di letteratura”, Salute e Società, 1 (XIII): 168-180.
  3. Garfinkel, H. (1967), Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.
  4. Gneezy, U., Leonard, K.L., List, J.A. (2009), Gender Differences in Competition: Evidence From a Matrilineal and a Patriarchal Society, Econometrica, 77(5): 1637-1664. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA6690
  5. Grazier, S., Sloane, P.J. (2007), Accident risk, gender, family status and occupational choice in the UK, Journal of Labor Economics, 22(4): 210-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2007.07.007
  6. Hochschild, A., Machung, A. (1990), The Second Shift, New York, Avon Books. Huber, M., Knottnerus, J.A., Green, L., van der Horst, H., Jadad, A.R., Kromhout, D., Leonard, B., Lorig, K., Loureiro, M.I., van der Meer, J.W.M., Schnabel,
  7. P., Smith, R., van Weel, Ch., Smid, H. (2011), “How should we define health?”, British Medical Journal, 343:d4163. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4163
  8. Linos, A., Kirch, W. (2008), Promoting Health for Working Women, New York, Springer Science.
  9. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2014), Mainstreaming gender into occupational safety and health practice, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  10. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2009), Workface diversity and risk assessment: Ensuring Everyone is covered, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  11. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2005), Mainstreaming gender into occupational safety and health, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  12. (2011), Risks and Trends in the Safety and Health of Women at Work, in www.osha.europa.eu.European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2003), Gender issues in safety and health at work. A review, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  13. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work – European Risk Observatory
  14. ENWHP (2007), Luxembourg Declaration on Workplace Health in the European Union. European Network for Workplace Health Promotion. Available from: http://www.enwhp.org/fileadmin/rs-dokumente/dateien/Luxembourg_Declaration.pdf.
  15. Emslie, C., Hunt, K., Macintyre, S. (1999), “Problematizing gender, work and health: the relationship between gender, occupational grade, working conditions and minor morbidity in full-time bank employees”, Social Science & Medicine, 48: 33-48.
  16. Ekeland, J., Johansson, F.J., Ärvelin, M.R., Lichtermann, D. (2005), “Self Employment and Risk Aversion: Evidence from Psychological Test Data”, Labour Economics, 12(5): 649-659.
  17. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunder, U.M., Schupp, J., Wagner, G.G. (2005), “Individual Risk Attitudes: New Evidence from a Large, Repre-sentative, Experimentally-Validated Survey”, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1730.
  18. DeLeire, Th., Levy, H. (2004), “Worker Sorting and The Risk Of Death On The Job”, Journal of Labor Economics, 22(4): 925-953.
  19. Cervia, S. (2014), Nuove povertà. Vulnerabilità e disuguaglianze di genere e generazioni, Pisa, Pisa University Press.
  20. R., Ninci, A. (a cura di), Salute e sicurezza sul lavoro, una questione anche di genere, Rischi lavorativi un approccio multidisciplinare, Rivista Inail degli infortuni e delle malattie professionali, vol. 4: 32-82.
  21. Cervia, S. (2013), “Una lettura gender-oriented delle dinamiche del mercato del lavoro in Toscana ai tempo della crisi”, in Biancheri, R. Carducci, A., Foddis,
  22. Carducci, A., Caponi, E. (2014), “La prospettiva di genere nella valutazione dell’esposizione a rischi lavorativi”, Salute e Società, 1 (XIII): 159-167.
  23. Brown, S., Taylor, K. (2005), Wage Growth, Human Capital and Risk Preference: Evidence from the British Household Panel, Manchester School, 73(6): 688-709.
  24. Lorber, J. (1994), Paradoxes of gender, Yale, Yale University Press (trad. it.: L’invenzione dei sessi, Milano, il Saggiatore, 1995).
  25. Vogel, L. (2011), Women and occupational diseases. The case of Belgium, European trade Union Institute, Health and Safety Department, Report n. 122.
  26. Wedderburn, A. (a cura di) (2000), Shift work and health, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  27. West, C., Zimmerman, D.H. (1987), “Doing Gender”, Gender and Society, 1(2): 125-151. DOI: 10.1177/0891243287001002002
  28. Wharton, A.S. (2005), The Sociology of Gender. An Introduction to Theory and Research, Malden, Backwell.
  29. Zanfrini, L. (2005), La rivoluzione incompiuta. Il lavoro delle donne tra retorica della femminilità e nuove disuguaglianze, Roma, Edizioni Lavoro.
  30. Masike, R., Mwanza, B., Masiyazi, L. (2014), “A Gender Sensitive Framework to Safety and Health at Work”, European Scientific Journal, 10(11): 155-168.
  31. Messing C. et al. (1994), “Can safety risks of blue-collar jobs be compared by gender?”, in Safety Science, 18: 95- 112
  32. Murdock, G.P., Provost, C. (1973), “Factors in the Division of Labor by Sex: A Cross Cultural Analysis”, Ethnology, April: 203-225.
  33. Nunin, R. (2014), “Tutela della sicurezza sul lavoro e prevenzione dei rischi per le lavoratrici: un nuovo terreno per il gender mainstreaming”, Salute e Società, 1 (XIII): 111-126.
  34. Nussbaum, M. (2011), Creating Capabilities. The Human development Approach, London-Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (trad. it.: Creare capacità. Liberarsi dalla dittatura del Pil, Bologna, il Mulino, 2012).
  35. Panelli, R., Gallagher, L.M. (2003), “«It’s your whole way of life really»: negotiating work, health and gender”, Health & Place, 9: 95-105.
  36. Piccone Stella, S., Saraceno, C. (1996), Genere. Costruzione sociale del femminile e del maschile, Bologna, il Mulino.
  37. Reed, R., Dahlquist, J. (1994), “Do Women Prefer Women’s Work?”, Applied Economics, 26: 1133-1144.
  38. Ridgeway, C.L., Correll, S.J. (2004), “Unpacking the Gender System”, Gender & Society, 18(4): 510-531. DOI: 10.1177/0891243204265269
  39. Ronay, R., Kim, D.Y. (2006), “Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: A socially facilitated phenomenon”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 45: 397-419. DOI: 10.1348/014466605X66420
  40. Rossiter, M.W. (1993), “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science”, Social Studies of Science, 23: 325-341.
  41. Ruspini, E. (2003), Le identità di genere, Roma, Carocci.
  42. Scotchmer, S. (2008), Risk taking and gender in hierarchies, Working Paper 14464, http://www.nber.org/papers/w14464. Tieves, D. (2011), Women and occupational diseases in the European Union, European trade Union Institute, Health and Safety Department, Report n. 118.
  43. Bond, M.A., Punnett, L., Pyle, J.L., Cazeca, D., Cooperman, M. (2004), “Gendered work conditions, health, and work outcomes”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9: 28-45.
  44. Biancheri, R., Carducci, A., Foddis, R., Ninci, A. (2013) (a cura di), Salute e sicurezza sul lavoro, una questione anche di genere, Rischi lavorativi un approccio multidisciplinare, Rivista INAIL degli infortuni e delle malattie professionali, vol. 4.
  45. Biancheri, R. (a cura di) (2014), “Genere e salute tra prevenzione e cura”, Salute e Società, 1 (XIII).
  46. Biancheri, R. (2010), “Genere e salute”, in AIS, Mosaico Italia. Lo stato del paese agli inizi del XXI secolo, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  47. Biancheri, R. (2008) (a cura di), La dimensione di genere nel lavoro. Scelte o vincoli nel quotidiano femminile, Pisa, Pisa University Press.
  48. Bellè, E. et al. (2015), “Storie di quotidiana in/sicurezza. Le relazioni pericolose tra i lavoratori a termine e la tutela della sicurezza e della salute sul lavoro”, in Cipolla, C., Mazzetti, M., Veneri, L., Sicurezza e salute sul lavoro. Quale cultura e quali prassi?, FrancoAngeli, Milano: 92-109.
  49. vol. 4: 173-198. Ballestrero, M.V. (2012), “Il viaggio è ancora lungo. La discriminazione di genere nel lavoro trent’anni dopo la legge di parità”, in Biancheri, R. (a cura di), Ancora in viaggio verso la parità, Pisa, Pisa University Press: 23-48.
  50. Baldasseroni, A., Caponi, E., Cervia, S., Ficini, G., Guidelli, P., Talini D. (2013), “Infortuni e malattie professionali in Toscana: un quadro di sintesi”, in Biancheri, R. Carducci, A., Foddis, R., Ninci, A. (a cura di), Salute e sicurezza sul lavoro, una questione anche di genere, Rischi lavorativi un approccio multidisciplinare, Rivista Inail degli infortuni e delle malattie professionali,
  51. Balbo, L. (1978), “La doppia presenza”, Inchiesta, 32: 3-6.
  52. van Veldhoven, M., Beijer, S. (2012), “Workload, Work-to-Family Conflict, and Health: Gender Differences and the Influence of Private Life Context”, Journal of Social Issues, 68(4): 665-683.
  53. Vogel, L. (2003), The Gender Workplace Health Gap in Europe, The Trade Union Technical Bureau for Health and Safety.

Silvia Cervia, Rita Biancheri, Migliorare la salute delle donne nei luoghi di lavoro: aspetti normativi e gestione dei rischi. Una ricerca in Toscana in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 1/2015, pp 44-72, DOI: 10.3280/SO2015-001003