Consumers’ self-organized short food chains: Solidarity Purchase Groups model

Author/s Silvio Franco, Clara Cicatiello, Emanuele Blasi, Barbara Pancino
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/2 Language Italian
Pages 24 P. 33-56 File size 189 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2015-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Consumers’ decisions are increasingly influenced by ethical issues. In the food domain it has led to the spread of alternative food supply chains. These innovative food networks, deaply embedded in the local domain, are characterized by a strong focus on food sustainability. Among them, the initiatives promoted and selforganized by consumers are particularly interesting as they disclose a high potential of fostering wider social changes. In this context, Solidarity Purchase Groups (called gas after the Italian acronym) emerge as spontaneous associations of consumers with strong ethical motivations including environmental, economic and social issues, which are fast-spreading in Italy. The aim of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, looking at consumers, we analyze the profile of the Italian consumers who participate to gass, in order to more precisely identify the target of these experiences, on the base of a large survey held in Italy on short food chain consumers; on the other hand, from a strategic and operational level, we discuss how these innovative supply chain models are organized, drawing from data retrieved for the 117 gas s operating in the city of Rome. The results show that gas participants have some specific features compared to consumers shopping in other alternative food chains, both in the socio-demographic profile and in their purchasing behavior, which is characterized by a strong ethical motivation. Looking at the organizational models of the gas s of Rome, the results of the survey confirm that the social dimension is very important in the management of these groups, as well as the principles at the base of their constitution, which very often refer to environmental concerns about farming techniques, social commitment to the local community and trust-based relations with the producers. Nevertheless, beside the social and environmental concerns, the economic dimension is still very important, as shared purchases most of the time results in a significant reduction in prices. The evidences confirm that the gas model represents a very interesting object of analysis for economists. Indeed, gas s are an unique example of completely demand-pull innovative food chain. Besides, they are able to involve consumers with specific needs and a strong ethical motivation underpinning the food purchase.

Keywords: Solidarity purchase groups, short food supply chains, ethical consumerism; food purchase motivations

Jel codes: Q13, M31

  1. D’Amico, S., De Luca, A.I. & Gulisano, G. (2013). Circuiti di produzione e consumo” alternativi” per l’organizzazione del sistema agro-alimentare calabrese: un quadro introduttivo. Economia agro-alimentare, 2, 73-96. DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2013-002005
  2. Edwards-Jones, G. (2010) Does eating local food reduce the environmental impact of food production and enhance consumer health? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 69(4), 582-591. DOI: 10.1017/s0029665110002004
  3. Follett, J. (2009). Choosing a Food Future: Differentiating Among Alternative Food Options. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics, 22, 31-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-008-9125-6
  4. Fonte, M. (2013). Food consumption as social practice: Solidarity purchasing groups in Rome, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 230-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.07.003
  5. Fonte, M., Eboli, M., Maietta, O.W., Pinto, B. & Salvioni, C. (2011). Il consumo sostenibile nella visione dei Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale di Roma. Agriregionieuropa, 7(27), 1-5.
  6. Galli, F. & Brunori, G. (eds.) (2013). Short Food Supply Chains as drivers of sustainable development. Evidence Document. Document developed in the framework of the FP7 project foodlinks (GA No. 265287). Pisa: Laboratorio di studi rurali Sismondi.
  7. Gazzetta Ufficiale (GU) (2007). Disposizioni per la formazione del bilancio annuale e pluriennale dello Stato (legge finanziaria 2008). Legge del 27 dicembre 2007, n. 244. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 300 del 28 dicembre 2007, Supplemento ordinario n. 285, 60. Roma.
  8. Goodman, D. (2003). The quality “turn” and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0743-0167(02)00043-8
  9. Grando, S. (2009). Esperienze di diversificazione qualitativa degli alimenti: la rilocalizzazione dei circuiti produzione-consumo. Economia Agro-alimentare, 1, 43-59. DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2009-001004
  10. Grasseni, C. (2013). Beyond alternative food networks: Italy’s Solidarity Purchase Groups. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  11. Haldy, H.M. (2004). Organic food subscription schemes in emerging organic markets: tei-kei, csa and Box-Schemes. Proceedings of the 6th ifaom-Asia Scientific Conference, 174-189. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture.
  12. Higgins, V., Dibden, J. & Cocklin, C. (2008). Building alternative food networks: certification, embeddedness and agri-environmental governance. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 15-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.06.002
  13. Hinrichs, C.C. (2000). Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural markets. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 295-303. DOI: 10.1016/s0743-0167(99)00063-7
  14. Ilbery, B. & Maye, D. (2005). Food supply chains and sustainability: evidence from specialist food producers in the Scottish/English borders. Land Use Policy, 22(4), 331-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.06.002
  15. Kirwan, J. (2004). Alternative strategies in the UK agro‐food system: interrogating the alterity of farmers’ markets. Sociologia ruralis, 44(4), 395-415. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00283.x.
  16. Kirwan, J. (2006). The interpersonal world of direct marketing: examining conventions of quality at UK farmers’ markets. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(3), 301-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.09.001
  17. Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Schmutz, U., Trenchard, L., Eyden-Wood, T., Bos, E., Sutton, G. & Blackett, M. (2013). Short food supply chains and local food systems in the EU. A state of play of their socio-economic characteristics. Luxembourg: Publication of the European Commission Joint Research Centre.
  18. Malassis, L. (1973). Economie de la consommation et de la production agroalimentaire.
  19. In Malassis, L. (a cura di), L’économie agro-alimentaire. Paris: Edition Cujas.
  20. Marsden, T., Banks, J. & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia ruralis, 40(4), 424-438. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00158
  21. Martinez, S., Hand, M., Da Pra, M., Pollack, S., Ralston, K., Smith, T., Vogel, S., Clark, S., Lohr, L., Low, S. & Newman, C. (2010). Local food systems: concepts, impacts, and issues. Economic Research Report 97. Washington DC: usda Economic Research Service.
  22. Mc Garry-W.M., Spittler, A. & Ahern, J. (2005). A profile of farmers’ market consumers and the perceived advantages of produce sold at farmers’ market. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 36(1), 192-201.
  23. Ragusa, S. (2010). A tutto Gas. Milano: Edizioni Terre di Mezzo.
  24. Renting, H., Marsden, T.K. & Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A, 35(3), 393-412. DOI: 10.1068/a3510
  25. Rete dei gas (1999). Documento base dei gas. Un modo diverso di fare la spesa.
  26. Rossi A., Brunori G. & Guidi F. (2008). I mercati contadini: un’esperienza di innovazione di fronte ai dilemmi della crescita. Rivista di diritto alimentare, 2(3), 21-26.
  27. Sage, C. (2003). Social embeddedness and relations of regard: alternative ‘good food’ networks in south-west Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 47-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0743-0167(02)00044-x
  28. Saroldi, A. (2001). Gruppi di acquisto solidali. Guida al consumo locale. Bologna: emi Edizioni.
  29. Schifani, G. & Migliore, G. (2011). Solidarity purchase group and the new critical and ethical consumer trends: first results of a direct study in Sicily. New Medit, 3, 26-33.
  30. La Trobe, H. (2001). Farmers’ markets: consuming local rural produce. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(3), 181-192. DOI: 10.1046/j.1470-6431.2001.00171.x
  31. Vermeir, I. & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer ‘‘attitude - behavioral intention’’ gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169-194.
  32. Aa.Vv. (2009). gasp Gruppi di acquisto solidale e partecipativo. Milano: Edizioni Punto Rosso.
  33. Aguglia, L. (2009). La filiera corta: una opportunita per produttori e consumatori.
  34. Agriregionieuropa, 5(17), 16-20. Associazione Gaia (1999). Piccola guida al consumo critico. Milano: Edizioni Terre di Mezzo.
  35. Aubry, C. & Kebir, L. (2013). Shortening food supply chains: a means for maintaining agriculture close to urban areas? The case of the French metropolitan area of Paris. Food Policy, 41, 81-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.04.006
  36. Ballou, J. (2008). Open-ended question. Encyclopedia of survey research methods, 43, 548-550. DOI: 10.4135/9781412963947.n350
  37. Bazzani, C. & Canavari, M. (2013). Alternative Agri-Food Networks and Short Food Supply Chains: a review of the literature. Economia Agro-alimentare, XII(2), 11-34. DOI: 10.3280/ecag2013-002002
  38. Beamon, B.M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. International journal of production economics, 55(3), 281-294. doi 10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00079-6.
  39. Brunori, G., Rossi, A. & Guidi, F. (2012). On the new social relations around and beyond food. Analysing consumers’ role and action in Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (Solidarity Purchasing Groups). Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 1-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00552.x
  40. Brunori, G., Rossi, A. & Malandrin, V. (2011). Co-producing transition: innovation processes in farms adhering to solidarity-based purchase groups (gas) in Tuscany, Italy. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and food, 18(1), 28-53.
  41. Brunori, G., Rossi, A., Cerruti, R. & Guidi, F. (2009). Nicchie produttive e innovazione di sistema: un’analisi secondo l’approccio delle transizioni tecnologiche attraverso il caso dei farmers’ markets in Toscana. Economia agroalimentare, 3, 143-170. DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2009-003008
  42. Carrigan, M. & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer. Do ethics matter in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-577. DOI: 10.1108/07363760110410263
  43. Cembalo, L., Migliore, G. & Schifani, G. (2013). Sustainability and new models of consumption: the Solidarity Purchasing Groups in Sicily. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics, 26(1), 281-303. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-011-9360-0
  44. cia Marche (2011). Forme di vendita diretta organizzata. Azione realizzata ai sensi del psr Marche 2007/2013 Misura 1.1.1. b annualita 2010/2011.
  45. Cicatiello, C. & Franco, S. (2008). La vendita diretta: produttori, consumatori e collettivita. Agriregionieuropa, 4(4), 44-46.
  46. Cicatiello, C., Franco, S. & Pancino, B. (2012). L’indagine sui farmers’ market: analisi dei dati sui consumatori. In: D. Marino & C. Cicatiello (eds.), I farmers’ market: la mano visibile del mercato, 301-306. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  47. Cicatiello, C. & Franco, S. (2008). La vendita diretta: produttori, consumatori e collettivita. Agriregionieuropa, 4(14), 98-115.
  48. Cicatiello, C., Pancino, B., Pascucci, S. & Franco, S. (2015). Relationship patterns in food purchase: observing social interactions in different shopping environments. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(1), 21-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-014-9516-9
  49. Cicia, G., Cembalo, L., Del Giudice, T. & Verneau, F. (2012). Il sistema agroalimentare ed il consumatore postmoderno: nuove sfide per la ricerca e per il mercato. Economia agro-alimentare, 1, 117-142. DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2012-001006
  50. Coldiretti (2012). Boom degli acquisti diretti. La ricetta anticrisi degli italiani.
  51. Rapporto Coldiretti/SWG. Roma. Cone, C. & Myhre, A. (2000). Community Supported Agriculture: a sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? Human Organisation, 59(2), 187-197.

Silvio Franco, Clara Cicatiello, Emanuele Blasi, Barbara Pancino, Le filiere corte auto-organizzate dai consumatori: il modello dei Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 2/2015, pp 33-56, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2015-002003