More efficient and coherent CSDP? Mechanisms and operations in the post-Lisbon phase

Autori/Curatori Pirozzi Nicoletta
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2016/2 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 16 P. 195-210 Dimensione file 189 KB
DOI 10.3280/CEU2016-002009
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The innovations in the field of foreign, security and defence policy are probably the most relevant of the Lisbon Treaty. Whilst the origin of the majority of these innovations dates back to the Draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe of July 2003, their implementation is taking place in a completely different, more uncertain political environment, which has a heavy impact on European integration in general and particularly on the EU’s foreign policy. This article aims to map the main CSDP innovations introduced by the Lisbon Treaty and then analyze their concrete implementation, in order to evaluate both their potential and actual impact. In particular, the article focuses on those provisions that aim at: (1) adapting the EU’s role and interventions to increasingly complex and hybrid security challenges, i.e. the revision and extension of the Petersberg tasks; (2) introducing mechanisms that allow those Member States that are more willing and able to make progress in the defence sector to partially derogate to the unanimity rule, i.e. PESCO and PESCO light; (3) making commitments binding as for mutual defence and solidarity among Member States to react against traditional territorial challenges, i.e. armed aggressions, or new security threats, i.e. terrorist attacks, natural and men-made disasters. The final goal is to assess whether the provisions of the Treaty succeeded in realizing the objective to make CSDP more efficient and coherent, with a view to set the ground for a truly Europeanized security and defence system

  1. Biscop, S. and Coelmont, J. (2011). “CSDP and the “Ghent Framework”: The Indirect Approach to Permanent Structured Cooperation?”. In European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 16, Issue 2, 149-167
  2. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 2010/C 83/01. Brussels, 30 March 2010, --
  3. Council of the European Union (2014). COUNCIL DECISION of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause. 2014/415/EU. Official Journal of the European Union. L 192/53,-- TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014D0415&from=EN
  4. Council of the European Union (2015). Council conclusions on CSDP. 8971/15. Brussels, 18 May 2015,--
  5. Dijkstra H. (2015). Article 42.7 TEU following Paris attacks is mostly symbolic. Center for European Research in Maastricht. 19 November 2015, -- article-42-7-teu-following-paris-attacks-is-mostly-symbolic/
  6. European Commission (2014). Mission Letter by the President-elect of the European Commission to Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the European Commission. Brussels, 10 September 2014,--
  7. European Commission (2015). JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL, Capacity building in support of security and development - Enabling partners to prevent and manage crises. JOIN(2015) 17 final. 28 April 2015, --
  8. European Commission (2016). INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT, Capacity building in support of security and development in third countries. 15 March 2016, --http://ec.europa eu/ smartregulation/roadmaps/docs/2016_fpi_002_capacity_building_security_development.pdf
  9. European Council (2013). Conclusions. EUCO 217/13. Brussels, 20 December 2013, --
  10. European Parliament (2015). The EU’s mutual assistance clause. First ever activation of Article 42(7) TEU. Briefing. November 2015,-- BRIE/2015/572799/EPRS_BRI(2015)572799_EN.pdf
  11. Final Report by the High Representative/Head of the EDA on the Common Security and Defence Policy (2013). Brussels, 15 October 2013, -- docs/2013/131015_02_en.pdf
  12. High Representative (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign And Security Policy. Brussels, June 2016, --
  13. Hillions C. and Blockmans S. (2015). Europe’s self-defence: Tous pour un and et un pour tous? CEPS Commentary. Centre for European Policy Studies. Brussels, 20 November 2015, --
  14. Keohane, D. (2013). Fresh start or more of the same? Defence policy at the December EU Summit. FRIDE Policy Brief, n. 171. December 2013, -- fresh-start-or-more-of-the-same?-defence-policy-at-the-december-eu-summit
  15. Lehne, S. (2011). More Action.Better Service. How to Strengthen the European External Action Service. Policy Outlook, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,-- http://carnegieendowment .org/files/CEIP_Outlook_EAS-Lehne_C.pdf
  16. Speech by Catherine Ashton, High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, to the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee (2010). Brussels, 23 March 2010,--

Pirozzi Nicoletta, More efficient and coherent CSDP? Mechanisms and operations in the post-Lisbon phase in "CITTADINANZA EUROPEA (LA)" 2/2016, pp 195-210, DOI: 10.3280/CEU2016-002009