Nursing research in the United States of America

Journal title SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Author/s Douglas P. Olsen, Patrick C. Crane
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1 Language English
Pages 16 P. 80-95 File size 726 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2017-001007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Nursing research in the United States is briefly reviewed. The history of nursing in the US is a story of incrementally increasing professionalism and academic rigor resulting in a robust national research enterprise led by the National Institute for Nursing Research. The current state of research in US nursing is reviewed including the major relevant institutions: American Nurses Association, American Nurse Credentialing Center, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research, and Institute of Medicine. Nursing research in the United States has become an inclusive element in the work of the faculty of major universities. Furthermore, American nurses are expected to integrate the results of research into their practice. This expectation is illustrated through the evidence-based practice model of care as well as quality improvement initiatives conducted by American nurses. Highlights of current trends and issues in US nursing research are discussed within this article.

Keywords: History; Nursing; Research; Nursing Research; Research Trends; Research Funding

  1. Abraham J., Jerome-D’Emilia B., Begun J.W. (2011). The diffusion of Magnet hospital recognition. Health Care Management Review, 36(4): 306-314.
  2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2006). DNP Roadmap task force report. Available at:
  3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice. --Available at:
  4. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2015). DNP Factsheet. --Available at:
  5. American Nurses Association. Basic historical review of nursing and the ANA. --Retrieved from: AboutANA/History/BasicHistoricalReview.pdf (last access July 26, 2016).
  6. American Nurses Credentialing Center (2014). Addendum: Changes to the 2014 magnet application manual, december 2014. --Retrieved Aug 04, 2016 from:
  7. American Nurses Foundation (2016). History. Retrieved from
  8. Beard R.O. (1923). The Report of the Rockefeller Foundation on nursing education: A review and critique. American Journal of Nursing, 23(5): 358. DOI: 10.2307/340784
  9. Beck C.T., Harrison L. (2016). Mixed-Methods research in the discipline of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 39(3): 224-234. DOI: 10.1097/ANS.000000000000012
  10. Committee for the Study of Nursing Education (1923). Nursing and nursing education in the United States – the “Goldmark Report”. New York. Reprinted 1984 Garland.
  11. Cantelon P.L., National Institute of Nursing Research (U.S.) (2010). NINR: Bringing science to life. --Retrieved from
  12. CARE Ethical Principles of Engagement Committee (n.d.). Principles and Guidelines for Community-University Research Partnerships. Yale Center for Clinical Investigation.-- Retrieved from:
  13. Gebbie K.M. (2009). 20th-century reports on nursing and nursing education: What difference did they make?. Nursing Outlook, 57(2): 84-92.
  14. Giddings L.S., Grant B.M. (2007). A Trojan horse for positivism?: A critique of mixed methods research. Advances in Nursing Science, 30(1): 52–60.
  15. Grady P.A. (2010). Translational research and nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 58(3): 164–166.
  16. Henly S.J. (2014). Mother lodes and mining tools: Big data for nursing science. Nursing Research, 63(3): 155. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.000000000000004
  17. Holkup P.A., Tripp-Reimer T., Salois E.M., Weinert C. (2004). Community-based participatory research: an approach to intervention research with a Native American community. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(3): 162-175.
  18. Institute of Medicine (2011). The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press. --Retrieved from
  19. Ivanov L., Blue C. (2009). Public health nursing: Leadership, policy & practice. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar.
  20. Kelly L.Y. (1975). Dimensions of professional nursing (4th Ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
  21. Kelly P.J. (2005). Practical suggestions for community interventions using participatory action research. Public Health Nursing, 22(1): 65-73.
  22. Levine J.A. (2011). Poverty and obesity in the U.S. Diabetes, 60(11): 2667-2668.
  23. NINR (2011). Bringing science to life: NINR Strategic Plan. NIH publication #11-7783. --Available at:
  24. Meleis A.I. (1988). Doctoral education in nursing: Its present and its future. Journal of Professional Nursing, 4(6): 436-446. DOI: 10.1016/S8755-7223(88)80095-
  25. McGlynn E.A., Asch S.M., Adams J., Keesey J., Hicks J., De Cristofaro A., Kerr E.A. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(26): 2635-2645.
  26. Munn-Giddings C., McVicar A., Smith L. (2008). Systematic review of the uptake and design of action research in published nursing research, 2000-2005. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(6): 465-477. DOI: 10.1177/174498710809029
  27. Olsen D., Smania M. (2016). Determining When an Activity Is or Is Not Research. American Journal of Nursing, 116(10): 55-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000503304.52756.9
  28. Plano Clark V.L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6): 428-440. DOI: 10.1177/107780041036460
  29. Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR §46.111 (a) (1-7). (2009). --Available at:
  30. Roy C. (2014). Generating middle range theory. New York: Springer.
  31. Sandelowski M. (2000). Focus on research methods combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 23: 246–255.
  32. Selanders L.C., Crane P. (2010). Florence Nightingale in absentia: Nursing and the 1893 Columbian Exposition. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 28(4): 305–312. DOI: 10.1177/089801011036152
  33. Silberman G., Kahn K.L. (2011). Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. Millbank Quarterly, 89(4): 599-627.
  34. Voss J., et al. (2011). Searching for the noninvasive biomarker holy grail: Are urine proteomics the answer? Biological Research for Nursing, 13(3): 235-242. DOI: 10.1177/109980041140205
  35. Wachter R., Shojania K. (2000). Letters to the editor re: The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. New England Journal of Medicine, 342: 519-520.
  36. Working Group for the Study of Ethics in International Nursing Research (2003). Ethical considerations in international nursing research: A report from the International Centre for Nursing Ethics. Nursing Ethics, 10: 122-137.
  37. Witze A. (2016). Research gets increasingly international. Nature News. (1/19/2016).
  38. Yale School of Nursing. (2001). The Yale school of nursing: A Yale trecentennial exhibit. --Retrieved from:

Douglas P. Olsen, Patrick C. Crane, Nursing research in the United States of America in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1/2017, pp 80-95, DOI: 10.3280/SES2017-001007