Innovation and new business models in tourism

Author/s Marcella De Filippo, Delio Colangelo, Luca Farnia
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1 Language English
Pages 20 P. 149-168 File size 259 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2017-001010
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The tourism sector is constantly evolving and the market demands rapid changes and updates of the tourism industry. In recent decades, hypercompetition of the economic scenario has entailed the maturity of many businesses, attributing a central role to innovative processes and their dissemination in the economy of company management. At the same time, it has defined the need of monitoring the application of innovations, in order to control and improve the performance of companies and destinations. This study aims to analyze and define innovation in the tourism sector. Re-search actions included, on the one hand, indepth interviews with experts, identifying innovation in terms of process and product, digitalization and sustainability policies and, on the other hand, evaluating the interaction between these factors, in terms of substitutability and complementarity in management scenarios, in order to identify which one is essential to be competitive in the global scenario. The Fuzzy method and Choquet’s integral were used to aggregate the opinions of experts in a single "representative" preference. This method allows not only to evaluate the relative importance of each pillar, but also and especially, the level of interaction, or element complementarity and substitutability, between pairs of factors.

Keywords: Innovation, business model, fuzzy, tourism, local development, economy.

  1. Amabile T.M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Straw B.M., Cummings L.L. (eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 10.
  2. Bieger T. (1998). Reengineering destination marketing organizations: The case of Switzerland. The Tourist Review, 53(3).
  3. Busacca B. (1994). Le risorse di fiducia dell’impresa. Torino: Utet.
  4. Campagnolo L., Carraro C., Eboli F. et al. (2017). The Ex-Ante Evaluation of Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Social Indicators Research.
  5. Chiarullo L., Colangelo D., De Filippo M. (2016). Il turismo nei Parchi. Analisi del potenziale competitivo delle aree protette: il caso Basilicata. Feem Press.
  6. Costabile M. (2011). La misurazione delle performance dell’impresa che innova: aspetti definitori e verifiche empiriche. The Italian Journal of Management.
  7. D’Aveni R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition. Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: The Free Press.
  8. Dosi G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3): 147-162.
  9. Farnia L., Giove S. (2015). Fuzzy Measures and Expert’s Opinion Elicitation – An application to FEEM sustainability index. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 37.
  10. Farnia L., Giove S. (2015). Fuzzy measures and experts’ opinion elicitation – An application to the FEEM sustainable composite indicator. Smart Innovation, System and Technologies, 37: 229-241.
  11. Farnia L., Silvestri A. (2015). 2015 ICCG climate think tank ranking. --Available
  12. Galli S., Torreggiani S. (2006). La gestione dell’innovazione nelle piccole e medie imprese. Strumenti e metodi per innovare processi, prodotti e servizi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Grabisch M. (1996). The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 89(3): 445-456.
  14. Grabisch M. (1997). k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92(2): 167-189.
  15. Grabisch M., Roubens M. (2000). Application of the Choquet integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy measures and integrals – theory and applications. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag (pp. 348-374).
  16. Grabisch M., Nguyen H.T., Walker E.A. (1995). Fundamentals of uncertainty calculi with applications to fuzzy inference. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  17. Hamel G., Prahalad C.K. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review.
  18. Ishii K., Sugeno M. (1985). A model of human evaluation process using fuzzy measure. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 67: 19-38.
  19. Kotler P., Bowen J.T., Makens J.C. (2010). Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism. Prentice Hall.
  20. Manente M., Cerato M. (2000). From Destination to Destination Management and Marketing. Atti della V CISET International Conference, Venezia, Cafoscarina.
  21. Marichal J.-L. (2000a). Behavioral analysis of aggregation in multicriteria decision aid. Preferences and Decisions under Incomplete Knowledge, 51: 153-178.
  22. Marichal J.-L. (2004). Tolerant or intolerant character of interacting criteria in aggregation by the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 155: 771-791.
  23. Marichal J.-L. (2007). K-intolerant capacities and Choquet integrals. European Journal of Operational Research, 177: 1453-1468.
  24. Marichal J.-L., Roubens M. (2000). Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set.
  25. Meyer P., Roubens M. (2005). Choice, ranking and sorting in fuzzy multiple criteria decision aid. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. New York: Springer (pp. 471-506).
  26. Morbey G.K., Reithner R.M. (1990). How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability. Research-Technology Management, 33(3), May-June.
  27. Mori T., Murofushi T. (1989). An analysis of evaluation model using fuzzy measure and the Choquet integral. In: 5th fuzzy system symposium. Kobe (in Japanese), pp. 207-212.
  28. Munda G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE): Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Re-search, 158(3): 662-677.
  29. Murofushi T., Soneda S. (1993). Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (III): interaction index. In: 9th fuzzy system symposium. Sapporo, Japan, pp. 693-696.
  30. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Ma: The Belknapp Press of Harvard University Press.
  31. Pinar M., Cruciani C., Giove S., Sostero M. (2014). Constructing the FEEM sustainability index: A Choquet-integral application. Ecological Indicators, 39: 189-202.
  32. Porter M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press: New York.
  33. Rullani E. (2012). Innovazione e produttività. Alla ricerca di nuovi modelli di business per le imprese. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  34. Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
  35. Trotter P. (2005). Innovation Management and New Product Development. Pearson Education Limited.
  36. Valdani E. (1995). Marketing Strategico. Milano: Etas.
  37. Veronesi M., Visioli A. (2003). Logica Fuzzy. Fondamenti teorici e applicazioni pratiche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

  • Reviving Businesses With New Organizational Change Management Strategies Albérico Travassos Rosário, pp.1 (ISBN:9781799874522)

Marcella De Filippo, Delio Colangelo, Luca Farnia, Innovation and new business models in tourism in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2017, pp 149-168, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2017-001010