Gender representation in corporate governance: a comparison between legal systems

Author/s Rossella Rivaro
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/148
Language Italian Pages 16 P. 134-149 File size 115 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2017-148008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In recent years the view consensus is that gender diversity in corporate boards is an important goal of the economic community. This opinion is based on two primary claims. The first is that diversity provides equal opportunities in the labour market. The second increasingly common claim is that diversity will improve organizational processes and firm performance. The law can play a fundamental role for the achievement of a satisfying gender balance in the allocation of the apical roles of the targeted companies. However, the legal solutions that can be adopted to achieve this goal vary substantially, either from the point of view of the technique adopted by the relevant legislators or as to the substance of the regulation, which depends on the selection of the targeted entities, their specific obligations and the tools that they should adopt to fulfil them.

Keywords: Law, corporate governance, gender diversity, hard law, soft law

  1. Adams R.B., Ferreira D. (2009). Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance. J. Fin. Econ.: 291 ss.
  2. Ahern K.R., Dittmar A.K. (2012). The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation. Q. J. Econ.: 137 ss.
  3. Bennet P. (2012). Australia’s Female-less Boardrooms. /groups/australiansite/documents/literature/women-inboardroom.Pdf, 30.3.2017.
  4. Bennhold K. (2009). Where Would We Be If Women Ran Wall Street? N. Y. Times, Feb. 1.
  5. Bertrand M., Black S.E., Jensen S., Lleras-Muney A. (2014). Breaking the Glass Ceiling? The Effect of Board Quotas on Female Labor Market Outcomes in Norway,, 30.3.2017.
  6. Bianco M., Ciavarella A., Signoretti R. (2011). Women on boards in Italy. Testo disponibile al sito
  7. Brammer S. (2009). Corporate Reputation and Women on the Board. Brit. J. Mgmt.: 17 ss.
  8. Branson D.M. (2012). Initiatives to Place Women on Corporate Boards of Directors - A Global Snapshot. J. Corp. Law: 793 ss.
  9. Butler S.R. (2012). All on board! Strategies for constructing diverse boards of directors. Va. L. & Bus. Rev.: 61 ss.
  10. Callegari M., La Gender Equity e gli interventi dell’Unione Europea: a quando l’armonizzazione? Giur. it.: 2529 ss.
  11. Calvosa L., Rossi S. (2013). Gli equilibri di genere negli organi di amministrazione e controllo delle imprese. ODCC: 3 ss.
  12. Carter D.A., Simkins B.J., Simpson W.J. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity and Firm Value. Fin. Rev.: 33 ss.
  13. Carter D.A., D’Souza F., Simkins B.J., Simpson W.J. (2010). The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of U.S. Boards and Board Committees and Performance. Corp. gov.: an int’l rev.: 396 ss.
  14. Catalyst (2008). Advancing women leaders: the connection between women board directors and women corporate officers. Testo disponibile sul sito
  15. Catalyst (2011). The bottom line: corporate performance and women’s representation on boards (2004-2008). Testo disponibile sul sito
  16. Catalyst (2017). Women CEOs of the S&P 500. Testo disponibile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  17. CGE, 7.10.1995, C-405/93. Testo disponibile sul sito
  18. CGE, 11.11.1997 C-409/95. Testo disponibile sul sito
  19. CGE, 8.3.2000, C-158/97. Testo disponibile sul sito
  20. CGE, 6.7.2000, C-407/98. Testo disponibile sul sito
  21. Choudhury B. (2015). Gender Diversity on Boards: Beyond Quotas. Testo disponibile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  22. Corte cost., 12.9.1995, n. 422. Testo disponibile sul sito
  23. Corte cost., 13.2.2003, n. 49. Testo disponibile sul sito
  24. Corte cost., 14.1.2010, n. 4. Testo disponibile sul sito
  25. Dagnes J. (2015). La rappresentanza di genere nei CdA italiani: una prospettiva sociologica. Giur. it.: 2256 ss.
  26. Davies E.M. (2011). Women on boards. Testo disponbile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  27. Desana E. (2015). L’equilibrio di genere: la Legge Golfo-Mosca nel quadro delle azioni positive. Giur. it.: 2515 ss.
  28. Drygala T. (2015). Harte Quote, weiche Quote und die Organpflichten von Vorstand und Aufsichtsrat. NZG: 1129 ss.
  29. Erhardt N.L., Werbel J.D., Shrader C.B. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corp. Gov.: an int’l rev.: 102 ss.
  30. European Commission (2016). Gender balance on corporate boards. Europe is cracking the glass ceiling. Testo disponibile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  31. Garilli C. (2012). Le quote di genere nella composizione degli organi delle società per azioni. Eur. dir. priv.: 885 ss.
  32. Grant Thornton (2016). Women in business. Testo disponibile sul sito
  33. Hampton P., Alexander H. (2016). FTSE Women Leaders. Testo disponibile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  34. Heidenreich V. (2012). Why Gender Quotas in Company Boards in Norway – and Not in Sweden? In: Engelstad F., Teigen M., a cura di, Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Bingley Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.: 154 ss.
  35. Innocenti A., Pazienza M.G. (2006). Altruism and Gender in the Trust Game. Testo disponibile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  36. Jianakoplos N.A., Bernasek A. (1998). Are Women More Risk Adverse? Econ. Inquiry: 620 ss.
  37. Klettner A. (2016). Corporate Governance Codes And Gender Diversity: Management-Based Regulation In Action. UNSW Law Journal: 715 ss.
  38. Lepri P. (2014). Germania, dal 2016 quote rosa per i cda: il 30% dei posti alle donne. Il Corriere della sera, 26.11.2014.
  39. MacLeod Heminway J. (2007). Wanted: Female Corporate Directors. Pace L. Rev.: 249 ss.
  40. Miller T., Triana C. (2009). Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity-Firm Performance Relationship. J. Mgmt. Studies: 755 ss.
  41. Milne R. (2012). Deja-vu in Norway over EU’s Women Quotas. Fin. Times, Oct. 23.
  42. Morera U. (2014). Sulle ragioni dell’equilibrio di genere negli organi delle società quotate e pubbliche. Riv. dir. comm., II: 155 ss.
  43. Noland N., Moran T., Kotschwar B. (2016). Is Gender Diversity Pro table? Evidence from a Global Survey. Testo disponibile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  44. Reiersen H., Sjafjell B. (2008). Report from Norway: Gender Equality in the Board Room. Eur. Co. L.: 191 ss.
  45. Rhode D., Packel A.K. (2014). Diversity on corporate boards: how much difference does difference make? Testo disponibile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  46. Seierstad C., Opsahl T. (2010). For the few not the many? The effects of affirmative action on presence, prominence, and social capital of women directors in Norway. Testo disponibile sul sito
  47. Simpson A., Whitmarsh T. (2015). Petition for amendment of proxy rule regarding board nominee disclosure. March 31, 2015. Testo disponibile sul sito, 30.3.2017.
  48. Smale A. (2013). Progress, but Still a Long Way to Go, for Women in Norway. N. Y.Times, June 4.
  49. The Economist (2017). The best and worst places to be a working woman. March 8.
  50. Zahra S.A., Stanton W.W. (1988). The Implications of Board of Directors’ Composition for Corporate Strategy and Performance. Int’l j. Mgmt.: 229 ss.

  • Board evaluation process in Italy: How far is it from the UK standard? Maria Gaia Soana, Giuseppe Crisci, in Corporate Board role duties and composition /2017 pp.6
    DOI: 10.22495/cbv13i3art1
  • Gender diversity in the workplaces: Regulatory framework, public policies, and a possible future scenario Giuseppe Calabrese, Rosario Bianco, Elaheh Anjomrouz, in Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review /2023 pp.27
    DOI: 10.22495/cgobrv7i3p3

Rossella Rivaro, La rappresentanza di genere negli organi di amministrazione e controllo delle società: modelli giuridici a confronto in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 148/2017, pp 134-149, DOI: 10.3280/SL2017-148008